Your tax dollars at work. (law school student loans, grants etc.)
This only makes it more certain the USA will act sooner rather than later. A general assembly vote will not happen because the other members do not want to be exposed for the naked emperors that they are.
This law professor is advocating going outside the US governmetn in order to enforce his views on US citizens. How much would it take for such leftists/socialists/communists to cooperate with such organizations to topple the USA's government? The communists did it, why not law professors?
Nevertheless, this is a leftist media wet dream that we should be on the alert for.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
To: longtermmemmory
2 posted on
03/15/2003 10:49:19 AM PST by
Servant of the Nine
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: longtermmemmory
So I'm just wondering whose standing Army the UN would use. Will Cameroon be attacking us? Madagascar? This is hilarious.
Can't wait for the U.N. to declare war on the U.S.
3 posted on
03/15/2003 10:49:39 AM PST by
Cosmo
(Liberalism is for girls)
To: longtermmemmory
All those pussies combined couldnt invade Greenland.
4 posted on
03/15/2003 10:49:51 AM PST by
Husker24
To: longtermmemmory
This fellow is as much a traitor as anybody who sold secrets to the Soviets and should be dealt with as such.
This is not a game.
These liberals need to be held accountable for their actions!
To: longtermmemmory
When did the Grand Fenwick get admitted to the UN?
6 posted on
03/15/2003 10:50:12 AM PST by
ken5050
To: longtermmemmory
The U.N. will do it if they want us to kick their ass around the block for drill.
To: longtermmemmory
Gee, I live here in New York and had the distinctive impression that the U.N. had already invaded.
8 posted on
03/15/2003 10:52:47 AM PST by
Bogie
To: longtermmemmory
The longer the attack is delayed the more time that is made available for idle minds to inject creativity into our national dialogue.
Delay 60 more days and even third graders will be provided a chance to formulate new UN policy.
To: longtermmemmory
Thanks for posting this.
Without the US or the UK, the UN couldn't invade any place.
This guy should be a prime suspect for treason. His background and financial records should be gone over with a microscope. If he has been financed by some Opecker Islamofacist thugs in the past or recently, try him for terrorism.
10 posted on
03/15/2003 10:53:45 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
To: longtermmemmory
All the world combined couldn't defeat the US.
Why? M.A.D. Still works.
To: longtermmemmory
Could the U.N. use military force Shouldn't they send 100 inspectors here first? :-)
13 posted on
03/15/2003 10:56:45 AM PST by
jlogajan
To: longtermmemmory
He had two of his students at the law school research the resolution and now has sent out the word to every U.N. mission in New York.Sure, he's just a disinterested observer, like Hans Blix.
To: longtermmemmory
When "human rights" advocates take sides with Saddam types, it surely becomes obvious that human rights are not their real objective. I wonder if they realize quite how transparent they are.
16 posted on
03/15/2003 10:58:33 AM PST by
Sam Cree
To: longtermmemmory
Ratner is the same a**hole who goes to Cuba to hail the greatness of Fidel Castro's Cuba. Ratner should be charged with treason.
17 posted on
03/15/2003 10:59:39 AM PST by
David1
To: longtermmemmory
This is hilarious. We cant get France, Russia or Germany to ally with us to fight in Iraq, what makes this idiot think that they or China (who needs our market to stay afloat) or any third world country is going to take on the US to enforce the UN resolution. If these UN cowards wont do anything about Saddam who they agree is in violation of UN, then what makes the lawyer think that they will take on the US. Aint liberals funny when they get cornered?
18 posted on
03/15/2003 11:00:46 AM PST by
Dave S
To: longtermmemmory
It's laughable.
Do they realize that all of Europe combined only has a fraction of the US defense budget?
Nice of them to discuss "should we." They better get serious about "could we." The answer, of course, is "no they can't...not even close."
Also, any......ANY....discussion in the UN of such a proposition will REQUIRE that the US takes its money and military out of the UN and kicks their behind out of our nation.
Any....even a peep.
19 posted on
03/15/2003 11:01:17 AM PST by
xzins
(Babylon, you have been weighed in the balance and been found wanting!)
To: longtermmemmory
Let them try.
To: longtermmemmory
Michael Ratner, president of the Center for Constitutional Rights, a human-rights group in New York City.Is he any relation to that well known ultra leftist; Ellen Ratner; that ubiquitous talking head whose face carries enough Botox to wipe out the whole of sub-Saharan Africa?
23 posted on
03/15/2003 11:02:44 AM PST by
scouse
To: longtermmemmory
Let the U.N invade. Gives us a chance to test one of those MOAB's on the U.N. building.
26 posted on
03/15/2003 11:04:05 AM PST by
fjsva
To: longtermmemmory
I sure wish The President would use the words' "clear and present danger" in regards to Iraq. That would put all of this type of horse puckey to rest. I thought he was close to saying it during the last press conference, but alas...not so.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson