Posted on 04/22/2003 4:57:23 PM PDT by 11th_VA
SCIENTISTS searching for a cure for severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) have suffered a setback after finding that the virus blamed for the potentially fatal disease was not present in most patients taken ill. The World Health Organisation announced last week that the corona virus — responsible for the common cold — was at the root of the epidemic of a virulent strain of pneumonia. But Dr Frank Plummer, scientific director of the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, refuted the claim yesterday after weeks of intensive research into the disease that has killed 14 people in Toronto.
“Only 40 per cent of the people with what we call Sars have the corona virus. We have found no other virus but the connection between Sars and corona is actually very weak,” he said.
A WHO spokesman said that it was aware of the Canadian findings and was investigating. Dick Thompson, for the WHO, said that in previous tests carried out for the organisation the corona virus had been present in 90 per cent of all cases. “For now, we stand by our view that the corona virus is the cause, but what we need to investigate is why we have this anomaly in Canada,” he said. “One possibility is that it has been present in all the cases but is simply not being picked up at the time of testing. All the cases in Canada came from one infected person. We need to see if the virus has mutated.”
On April 16, Dr Klaus Stohr, of the WHO, released the results of a series of experiments on monkeys infected with Sars. “We can now say with all confidence that the causative agent of Sars is the corona virus first detected in Hong Kong on March 21,” he said. But Dr Marc-André Beaulieu, senior medical adviser with Health Canada, said that all scientists and government departments working on Sars should now be “more prudent”.
The announcement by Canadian officials came as researchers in British Columbia claimed to be doing a trial of a test for Sars on patients with suspected or probable symptoms of the disease. The researchers said that they were making progress and hoped to have a test available to the public within weeks.
But Dr Beaulieu said: “In order to develop a good diagnostic test you have to have a clear definition of the cause. For us this means we now have to be more prudent. We are saying that we would prefer to have a much more clear understanding of what causes the disease.”
The revelations from Health Canada coincided with an emergency meeting between Canadian health officials and senior officials from the American Centres for Disease Control.
American officials have become increasingly worried about the spread of Sars over the US-Canadian border since the disease was diagnosed this week in a man in Pennsylvania. The man was known to have been in contact with a 500-strong church group from Toronto, from which two people have died and 27 others have been infected. The 471 remaining members of the group are in quarantine.
Travellers to Toronto are being asked to monitor their health while in the city and during the ten days after their return. Sars has killed more than 230 people and infected some 4,500 since it emerged in China in November.
“Only 40 per cent of the people with what we call Sars have the corona virus.
Any one know of a more detailed account of his reasearch? I'd like to know if he was testing specimens from both suspected and probable cases. Also would like to know at what stage of their sickness these specimens were taken.
Are testing procedures flawed? Is the disease mutating into something we currently can't detect?
This is not good if truely the case. Tough finding a cure if you don't know the cause.
Unfortunately, we have a society that says "go to work, go to school", even if you're sick. The result is whole school districts get shut down!! If you're sick or your kids are sick, treat it like a sickness. STAY HOME!!
Sars, corona virus, death... prince of the power of the air and all of that.
08269 sar {sar}
from 08323; TWOT - 2295a; n m
AV - prince 208, captain 130, chief 33, ruler 33, governor 6, keeper 3,
principal 2, general 1, lords 1, misc 4; 421
1) prince, ruler, leader, chief, chieftain, official, captain
1a) chieftain, leader
1b) vassal, noble, official (under king)
1c) captain, general, commander (military)
1d) chief, head, overseer (of other official classes)
1e) heads, princes (of religious office)
1f) elders (of representative leaders of people)
1g) merchant-princes (of rank and dignity)
1h) patron-angel
1i) Ruler of rulers (of God)
1j) warden
The number of "probables" among Canada's total count is just a bit over 40%. Perhaps they were sampling from the "suspects" also.
Could you explain to the non-medical/science people here what this means? Thanks ---
I have tried to find the thread (wow, the threads were really hysterical back then, and I don't mean funny) but I can't get back that far.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.