A Legacy Worth Fighting For [re: judiciary]

CNSNews.com ^ | April 28, 2003 | Paul M. Weyrich

[Stand Watch Listen]

I am about to take a position that will make me a heretic in the conservative movement. My heresy this time relates not to a person but to an issue: judicial nominations.

I think federal judges are the most important legacy an administration can leave. They can outlast the presidency by a generation. Everything else a president does can be rescinded or repealed by his successor. Bill Clinton, with the stroke of a pen, rescinded the so-called Mexico City policy that had started during the presidency of Ronald Reagan and continued through the administration of George Herbert Walker Bush.

If Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Tom Daschle (D-SD) succeed in blocking the best of President Bush's federal judges, they will have deprived this administration of its most important legacy. To be honest about it, President Bush's nominees for the federal bench have been better than either those nominated by Reagan or his father. They are extraordinary. If Bush can fill all the vacancies in the federal court system, even if he should be denied a second term, then he will have made the greatest contribution a president can make.

To accomplish that, the current obstructionist tactics employed by the Senate liberals must be soundly thwarted. Right now a filibuster is being conducted against a nominee for the federal courts of appeals, and it appears a second one is being contemplated against another highly qualified nominee. At the same time, the liberals are applying a religious test against a district court nominee.

The only way a filibuster will be broken is if President Bush targets those Senators most likely to switch on cloture. He would then visit their states and single them out. Many of these Senators come from small states. A presidential visit would receive two full days of coverage. The grassroots could then follow up and really turn the heat on.

In addition, when that swing is completed, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) could then conduct a real filibuster, keeping the Senate in session around the clock. That would highlight to the American people just what the liberals are doing to Bush's outstanding judicial nominees.

There is a high probability that enough Democrats, especially those up for re-election next year, would defect from their leadership's line on a vote for cloture, permitting an up or down vote on the nominees. The odds would then be very high that all three nominees would be confirmed.

So far so good. Now comes my heresy. Right now the President and his cabinet are out pitching his tax cuts. It is a tough sell. Most Americans do not believe we should have more tax cuts at this time. It is unlikely the president will win this battle.

Make no mistake about it. I favor the President's original growth package. I want to see Congress enact it. But with the promise made by Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and Senator George Voinovich (R-OH) that no tax cuts higher than the $350 billion approved by the Senate would be permitted in a Conference Committee bill, it is going to be pretty tough to bring these folks back on the reservation.

The President can't handle two such issues at the same time. While I am all for his tax cuts and believe they are important to jump start the economy, I think the probability is low that the President will win this battle. On the other hand, if President Bush goes all out and makes the case against the obstructionism that is going on in the U.S. Senate, I think the probability is high that he can win that case.

I know for much of the conservative movement tax cuts are the highest priority there is. My heresy comes into play because I am suggesting that federal judges are a higher priority than tax cuts.

We can probably live with $350 billion in tax cuts, especially if the President pushes hard for his energy bill, which would also help to jump-start the economy.

We can't live with Ted Kennedy and Tom Daschle keeping the best of Bush's judicial nominees off of the bench.

In my view, the White House needs to scrap its tax cut crusade immediately in favor of a crusade to get enough Senators to vote for cloture so that his judicial nominees can be confirmed. The federal judiciary affects every issue any of us is interested in.

The war in Iraq may not be Bush's lasting legacy. We don't know how many weapons of mass destruction will be found. Moreover, if democracy brings fundamentalist Muslims to power, we will end up with something worse than what we had before the war.

I am not suggesting that things will necessarily turn out bad. I am suggesting it is a possibility. On the other hand, President Bush's superb nominees for federal judgeships -- if they are confirmed -- will be on the federal bench for 20, even 30 years. That is a legacy worth fighting for.

(Paul M. Weyrich is chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.)

Free Congress Foundation

[AbsoluteJustice]

This is why I think that Frist has no backbone!!! He should keep Senate in session around the clock and we shall see who folds first but Frist like many weak republicans before him are spineless and will let the liberals steamroll over them.

[Stand Watch Listen]

Related Articles: and past Senate Democrats’ obstructionism

The Constitution Be Damned - Democrats try to impose a religious test on judges
Source: WSJ OpinionJournal.com; Published: April 22, 2003; Author: BRENDAN MINITER

The Democrats’ Big Plan
Source: National Review; Published: April 3, 2003; Author: Byron York

Filibuster Si, Estrada No!
Source: Weekly Standard; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Major Garrett

Talking Nonsense - The Senate Filibuster
Source: BreakPoint with Charles Colson; Published: March 13, 2003; Author: Mark Earley

Estrada & the Dream
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 12, 2003; Author: René Fonseca

President Calls for Action on Judicial Nominations
Source: White House Office of the Press Secretary Published: , March 11, 2003.

Miguel Estrada: The President Must Take His Case To The People
Source: CNSNews; Published: March 11, 2003; Author: Paul M. Weyrich

Left-Wing Democrat U.S. Senators Thwarting The Will Of 'We The People'
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: March 10, 2003; author: Wallace Honley

Estrada and the future of the judiciary
Source: Washington Times; Published: March 10, 2003; Author: Nat Hentoff

Supermajority Rules?: Why the Estrada filibuster is unconstitutional
Source: Wall Street Journal; Published: , March 8, 2003; Author: Douglas W. Kmiec

Barbara Stanley: Hillary Barks Her Marching Orders To Democrats: Bork Miguel Estrada!
Source: Toogood Published: March 7, 2003: Author: Barbara Stanley

Dems: We Don’t Really Want Answers from Estrada.
Source: National Review; Published: March 4, 2003; Author: Byron York

The Minority Democrats' War In The Senate For Control Of America
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: Febraury 28, 2003; Author: Mary Mostert

Senate Democrats: Filibusters Are No Longer Just For The Floor
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: John Nowacki

Senator Leahy's Comments on Senate Floor against Estrada (26 Feb 2003) (Revised)
Source: The Congressional Record (New Search required each time); Published: 27 Feb 2003; Author: | Sen Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Ted Kennedy's Grand Design
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 27, 2003; Author: Robert D. Novak

Linda Chavez: Republicans Need To Call Dems' Bluff On Estrada Nomination
Source: CNSNES.com; Published: February 26, 2003; Author Linda Chavez

Senate Democrats Can't Get Their Facts Straight
Source: CNSNews.com ; Published: February 14, 2003; Author: John Nowacki

Estrada: Now It’s War
Source: National Review Online; Published: February 12, 2003; Author: Byron York

Leahy’s Surprise Attack
Source: National Review Online; Published: October 9, 2002; Author: Byron York

Shedded by Judiciary: Senate Democrats cast off another appointee
Source: Wall St Journal; Published: October 9, 2002

Miguel Estrada May be Next Victim Of Judiciary's 'Gang Of Ten'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: September 09, 2002; Author: Paul M. Weyrich

Toward Priscilla Owen, Not Even The Pretense Of Fairness
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: August 01, 2002; Author: John Nowacki

The Owen Nomination: Liberals Don't Let Truth Stand In Their Way
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: July 18, 2002; Author: John Nowacki

Democrats Hold Judicial Nominations for 406 Days and Counting
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published: June 21, 2002; Author: Christine Hall

Judge The Senate Judiciary Committee Not By What It Says, But What It Has Done
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: | June 06, 2002; Author: John Nowacki

The Left Keeps Trying -- And Failing -- To Smear Brooks Smith
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: May 16, 2002; Author: John Nowacki

Pickering Battle Places Congress on Verge of 'Institutional Crisis'
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 07, 2002; Author: Jeff Johnson

Make them pay for 'Borking': David Limbaugh rebukes spineless Republicans to support Pickering
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: March 5, 2002; Author: David Limbaugh

The GOP's Post-Pickering Strategy
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 1, 2002; Author: Byron York

Pickering Fight Shows Liberals At Their Worst
Source: Roll Call.com; Publblished: February 21, 2002; Author: Mort Kondracke

Still Pestering Pickering
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 19, 2002; Author: John Nowacki

Dismantling Democracy through Judicial Activism
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 12, 2002; Author:Tom Jipping

'A Troubling Pattern': Ideology Over Truth In Judicial Confirmations
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: February 10, 2002; Author: Paul E. Scates

Democrats Blast Bush Judicial Nominee
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published: February 08, 2002; Susan Jones

The Next Big Fight: The first major judicial-confirmation battle of the Bush administration.
Source: National Review: Published: Feburary 6, 2002; Author:Byron York

SYMPOSIUM Q: Should the Senate Take Ideology into Account in Judicial Confirmations
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 4, 2002;
Authors:
Ralph G. Neas -- YES: The ideology of nominees for the federal judiciary matters more now than ever
Roger Pilon -- NO: Since judges apply law, not make it, the Senate's concern should be with judicial temperament

What is the Judiciary Committee Trying to Hide?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: January 29, 2002; Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Blasting Conservative Judges: Liberals Launch Their Campaign
Source: cnsnews.com; Published: January 24 2002; Author: Matt Pyeatt

Judicial Confirmation Lies, Deception and Cover-up
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: December 11, 2001; Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Senator Leahy Does Not Meet His Own Standards
Source:.cnsnews.com; Published: December 07, 2001; Author: By John Nowacki

Senator Daschle Must Remove 'Leaky Leahy' From Judiciary Committee
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 4, 2001; Author: Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

A Disgraceful Blocking of Nominees
Source: The Wall Street Journal (ltr to ed) Published: December 3, 2001

Mr. Leahy's Fuzzy Math
Source: Washington Times;Published: December 3, 2001; Author: Editorial

Sen. Patrick Leahy; Our Constitutional Conscience?
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 2, 2001; Author: Paul E. Scates

Judicial confirmations called significantly low
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 30, 2001; Author: Audrey Hudson

Patrick Leahy - Words Do Kill
Source: PipeBombNews.com; Published: November 29, 2001; Author: William A. Mayer

Judicial Profiling
Source: The Wall Street Journal; Published: November 27, 2001

Sen. Leahy's judicial hostages
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 21, 2001

Judges Delayed is Justice Denied
Source: CNSNews.com ; Published: November 20, 2001; Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Partisanship is Prevalent with Leahy's Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: November 15, 2001; Author: John Nowacki

Leahy And Daschle Are Coming Face To Face With Their Own Words
Obedient Democrats
Source: CNSNEWS.com; Published October 26, 2001; Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Why is Daschle Blocking Judges needed to Try Terrorists when we Catch them?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published: October 26, 2001; Author: Mary Mostert

Pat Leahy's Passive Aggressive Game
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: October 25, 2001; Author: John Nowacki

Operation Obstruct Justice
Source: Washington Times; Published: October 25, 2001; Author: T.L.Jipping

Daschle wins struggle over judicial nominations
Source: The Washington Times; Published: Oct 24, 2001; Author: Dave Boyer

Leahy doctrine ensures judicial gridlock
Source: Washington Times; Published October 22, 2001

Senate's judicial powergrab: Tom Jipping tracks Dems' assault on courts
Source: WorldNetDaily.com; Published: June 28, 2001; Author: Tom Jipping

Dems Will Shut Down Judicial Confirmations
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the Free Congress Foundation; Published: June 13, 2001; Author: Thomas L. Jipping

[AbsoluteJustice]

LOL AWESOME cartoon.

[Carry_Okie]

Thank Carl Rove for Bill Frist.

[MHGinTN]

My heresy comes into play because I am suggesting that federal judges are a higher priority than tax cuts. Weyrich Democrats agree with Mister Weyrich. The fiat of liberalism legislating from the benches around the nation is last vestige of democrat's insidious power to mutate this Republic. Controlling the courts, to put the democrat's brand of justice upon the land (like legalizing abortion slaughter in the name of right to privacy, and approving sodomy by fighting to overturn a state's legal case over that corrosive behavior) is the only means left to the despotic democrats since they've been repudiated from control of Congress or the Whitehouse.

[MainstreamConservative]

The most important thing that President Bush can do is appoint and confirm conservative judges. If he succeeds, 40 years of liberalism, legislated from the courts, WILL come to a screeching halt.

[DED]

This article's points are very well made. But if the economy hasn't started picking up in obvious fashion by the next election, George will be toast, just like Bush '91. I saw an article by Mortimer Zuckerman (of US News) that I thought offered a better return than our esteemed President's full plan, and a better chance of passing as well. You can find it here: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/mort/zuckerman021403.asp

[DED]

Thanks for collecting all these articles. I'm going to be a while reading these. In the meantime, I don't see one excellent article from National Review: "You're not Hispanic enough" by Byron York

[Stand Watch Listen]

Thanks for the heads-up on this article...appreciate it. Now have it in my judiciary complilation.

Dems to Miguel Estrada: You’re Not Hispanic Enough
Source: National Review; Published; February 6, 2003, Author: Byron York