Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canadian Firm Prints Harry Potter on Green Pages (Laugh-till-you-die Alert)
Environment News Service (ENS) ^ | June 20, 2003 | Some Green Moron

Posted on 06/21/2003 8:34:57 PM PDT by nwrep

Canadian Firm Prints Harry Potter on Green Pages

VANCOUVER, British Columbia, June 19, 2003 (ENS) - Fans of the Harry Potter (news - web sites) books probably do not associate the little wizard with rainforests or recycling, but that will change for at least 935,000 readers of "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." The Canadian edition of the eagerly anticipated book--all 935,000 copies--has been printed by Canadian publisher Raincoast Books on 100 percent recycled, endangered forest free paper, a move that many believe represents a landmark event for environmentally friendly publishing.

Sierra Club of Canada - British Columbia Chapter
Greenpeace: Action to Protect Ancient Forests
OneWorld on Forests


Supported by
Cable & Wireless

"By printing the latest Harry Potter book on 100 percent recycled paper, Raincoast has set the stage for a complete transformation of the publishing industry," said Lafcadio Cortesi, director of the Boreal Campaign at ForestEthics. "Readers everywhere appreciate that the magic is not just what is written on the pages, it is the very pages themselves."

And the author of the largest selling fiction book in history has penned her own heartfelt endorsement of Raincoast's decision to publish Potter's latest adventure on ancient forest friendly paper.

"The forest at Hogwarts is home to magical creatures like unicorns and centaurs," Rowling writes in an endorsement that appears prominently in the Canadian edition.

"Because the Canadian editions are printed on Ancient-Forest Friendly paper, the Harry Potter books are helping to save magnificent forests in the muggle world, forests that are home of magical animals such as Orangutans, Wolves and Bears," Rowling wrote. "It is a good idea to respect ancient trees, especially if they have a temper like the Whomping Willow."

According to research done by Markets Initiative--a coalition project of three environmental organizations, Friends of Clayoquot Sound, Greenpeace Canada and the British Columbia Chapter of Sierra Club (news - web sites) of Canada--the 935,000 books printed by Raincoast Books will save almost 30,000 trees in forests such as the Boreal forest of Canada, as well as in Canada's rainforests and throughout the Rockies region.

In addition, it will conserve 20,248 BTUs of electricity--195 years of electricity to power the average American home--and 2,679,548 pounds of greenhouse gases, which equals 2.4 million miles traveled by car with average fuel efficiency.

The paper used in the books printed by Raincoast was produced by San Francisco-based New Leaf Paper.

The greening of Potter is part of a broader effort by publishers and writers in Canada and the U.S., led by Markets Initiative, to increase the use of environmentally friendly papers in their books.

Thus far, 35 Canadian and 20 U.S. publishers have made formal commitments to use recycled and other environmentally preferable papers, and millions of forest-friendly books have been printed on such paper in Canada during the past 18 months.

"We look forward to seeing publishers in other countries follow the lead of their Canadian colleagues in helping to safeguard biodiversity and the world's remaining ancient forests," said Markets Initiative's Campaigns Director Nicole Rycroft.

In addition, Green Press Initiative is pressuring U.S. publishers, including the U.S. publisher of the Potter books, Scholastic, to secure endangered-forest free commitments.

According to Green Press, if Scholastic made an endangered-forest free commitment and switched to 100 percent recycled paper for the next Potter book, and printed the same quantity, it would conserve an area of trees some 13 times the size of New York's Central Park and some 24 million pounds of greenhouse gases--equal to the amount of greenhouse gas emitted by a car with average fuel efficiency traveling 21.81 million miles.

According to American Forest and Paper Association figures, less than five percent of the paper used by the printing and writing paper sector contains recycled fibers--in the year 2000 the association says one million tons of paper were used by U.S. book publishers.

The groups promoting the eco-friendly Potter print suggest that fans who live outside of Canada go online to purchase the Canadian edition.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Canada; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; enviralists; green; harrypotter; kyotolist; recycle; sanfrancisco; stupidity; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Paper machines are wonderful places to grow microbial lifeforms.(Warm and wet.) If recycled pulp is used, it requires the use of some of the most poisonous substances known to man, in large quantities, to keep microbial comtamination managable. Papermaking with recycle pulp is much more chemically intense than with virgin pulp. De-inking also requires chemicals, end result, all that isothiazolin, glutaraldehyde, and quaternary amine winds up in the environment. I know, I sell millions of dollars of biocides a year. I love when a mill decides to use recycle pulp.
41 posted on 06/22/2003 6:48:42 AM PDT by Comus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Comus
Firs this - Paper machines are wonderful places to grow microbial lifeforms.(Warm and wet.) If recycled pulp is used, it requires the use of some of the most poisonous substances known to man, in large quantities, to keep microbial comtamination managable. Papermaking with recycle pulp is much more chemically intense than with virgin pulp. De-inking also requires chemicals, end result, all that isothiazolin, glutaraldehyde, and quaternary amine winds up in the environment. I know, I sell millions of dollars of biocides a year. I love when a mill decides to use recycle pulp.

And second - trees are the best example of harvesting for use. I don't espouse using "ancient" wood, like redwoods, I assume, but growing trees, harvesting them and using them for paper is the best example of renewable resources America has. Paper companies manage the forests the best of any company utilizing any of our natural resources.

Printing on recycled paper, as "Comus" has commented is incredibly chemical intensive. The paper companies have it right - harvest and planting new trees are a finely tuned balance they have perfected. People get all crazy about "recycling" without finding out about the chemical cost. We all need to educate ourselves on what is energy- and CHEMICAL-conservation.

Using plastic grocery bags, and recycling them, means that they are used in shoes, packaging and other reusable products. Using paper and recyling it means toxic chemicals used in the process, to get rid of microbes in the paper products.

Choose carefully at the grocery store on your next visit. And, oh yeah, at the bookstore!

42 posted on 06/22/2003 7:07:46 AM PDT by TruthNtegrity (God bless America, God bless President George W. Bush and God bless our Military!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
What's that fuzzy thing on the head of the girl on the far left? A fur derby? Or is that her hair?? What's recycling got to do with freeing pot?
43 posted on 06/22/2003 7:59:08 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Recycling is a great thing. There's nothing wrong with it, though the term 'tree free' is an outright lie. Recycled paper was still originally made from trees.

Raincoast is NOT the first compant on print books on recycled paper. O'Reilly, a publisher of programming textbooks, has been printing on recycled paper for years. Raincoast may be the first CANADIAN publisher to do so, but they have hardly transformed the publishing industry.

The article is ignorant, blatant propaganda, meant to remind the population of the need to protect the environment from the evil logging companies and help them to forget their economic woes and the growing disgust with the government.

44 posted on 06/22/2003 8:14:33 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom9
"You need to spend some time in an old growth forest on the west coast to appreciate what it's about"

Paper companies don't cut old growth forest. They utilize tree farms (frequently the targets of ELF arsonists, BTW) for that. Fast-growing pulp wood trees. It's cheaper, they own the ground where their trees are planted, and the trees are replaced as soon as they're cut, so that the next crop can be guaranteed.

45 posted on 06/22/2003 8:21:09 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
"Plant stuff while they sit up in a tree"

Heheheh. Great idea.

Most of the loggers I know love the woods and love the trees. Some people will be shocked to know that loggers know a tad about growing trees, as well as cutting them down.

Take oaks. Acorns are very hard to sprout. Hubby's crew went to their respective homes one evening bearing handsful of acorns. To sprout in our houses and plant in a year. Yes, about half of them did sprout, and yes, all of us did plant them. Uh...ok, so one is them is in our back yard...we like oaks, but have mostly cherry and spruce on our property. It's about 7 feet tall this year and has slowed down. Another thing about oaks is their slow growth...people want fast results, and so few people tend to plant them.

We will not live to see that tree reach maturity. But our grandkids will.

These guys do things like this all the time. Trees are a renewable resource. The more we plant, the more we have.

46 posted on 06/22/2003 8:32:28 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kms61
NOT OLD trees!
47 posted on 06/22/2003 8:41:08 AM PDT by goodnesswins (FR - the truth, and nothing but the truth.........getting to the bottom of journalistic bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
"935,000 books...30,000 trees"

A little back of the envelope and we get 31 books per tree. I've seen a lot of trees; and I'm prepared to say that trees that unproductive of paper are not 'Ancient Forest Monarchs'.

I think we're talking weed species and pecker-poles....or else total disinformation.

These watermelon phonies are lifetime kindergartners; they think in feelings.

48 posted on 06/22/2003 8:56:00 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I've been to a paper mill in Texarkana. They bring whole logs of freshly cut loblolly pine and use every atom of it. Anything of the pine not used for paper (typically the bark) is used as fuel for the plant.
49 posted on 06/22/2003 9:43:08 AM PDT by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
thanks... I think one can be conservative and be interested in maximizing resources. That does not mean becoming a monkey wrenching nut.
50 posted on 06/22/2003 10:37:41 AM PDT by cyborg (I'm a mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
The best thing to recycle is trashed paper.

No, the best thing to recycle is Hillary's Lying History.

51 posted on 06/22/2003 10:47:27 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
Canada, GIVE ME A BREAK. Pulp wood for paper is a CROP, like corn. Mahogany, teak and redwoods are not used for paper.

Quality paper is judged by linen content, another crop.

One has to guess the Canucks are idiots or propagandists, or most likely some combination of both.
52 posted on 06/22/2003 10:52:48 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
What a bunch of fools. It's certainly is a laugh alert.
53 posted on 06/22/2003 11:21:57 AM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/notify?detach=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
This is PC HOGWASH, this re-cycling and all the rest of this globalist claptrap!

In a former life, I married into a lumber family... One of the largest in the S'West. A tree is a PLANT or a CROP, like a stalk of corn or a soy bean plant. People who are in the business of producting lumber REPLACE WHAT THEY USE - sometimes 2 x 1 - and they don't clear cut. That's stupid. Why clear cut and set up erosion on your own "farm," thus destroying your own crops, thus putting you out of business??

And those pre-pubescent twit children pictured above need to get inside and study their school work instead of worrying about weeds and nose rings.
54 posted on 06/22/2003 1:17:01 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
>>I think one can be conservative and be interested in maximizing resources<<

And why would you believe someone who lives off the production of good quality lumber would do less? Lumbermen were interested in maximizing old growth before we were even born.
55 posted on 06/22/2003 1:20:39 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Not just you, CyberAnt. I'm looking and I'm shocked that FR conservatives would buy into this junk too. Mind-boggling!
56 posted on 06/22/2003 1:27:54 PM PDT by Humidston (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I know that.
There was comments made about wasre, utilization, renewal, etc.
I just wanted to put a word in about preservation of old growth.
57 posted on 06/22/2003 1:35:26 PM PDT by freedom9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Paper companies don't cut old growth forest. They utilize tree farms

Yes. My mother's family used to own a tree farm. It was managed by a paper company. They'd cut trees and plant replacements in a cycle that suited their needs, and the family got a check for the profits each year.
The paper company kept it going nicely from the 1920's (I believe) until the early 80's, when we sold it because there were just too many heirs to deal with. It probably is still doing fine.

Tree farms are great for paper mills and Christmas trees. I think the people who are against using trees for any purpose must be city dwellers who rarely see one.

58 posted on 06/22/2003 3:08:00 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Paper companies don't cut old growth forest. They utilize tree farms

Yes. My mother's family used to own a tree farm. It was managed by a paper company. They'd cut trees and plant replacements in a cycle that suited their needs, and the family got a check for the profits each year.
The paper company kept it going nicely from the 1920's (I believe) until the early 80's, when we sold it because there were just too many heirs to deal with. It probably is still doing fine.

Tree farms are great for paper mills and Christmas trees. I think the people who are against using trees for any purpose must be city dwellers who rarely see one.

59 posted on 06/22/2003 3:11:02 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BradyLS
Well....I doubt loblolly's can be used for much else than paper....if they could make more money using them for lumber for houses, etc....they would. Which was my point. Old growth is not used for paper, unless it's the part of it not able to be used for other products.
60 posted on 06/22/2003 5:44:26 PM PDT by goodnesswins (FR - the truth, and nothing but the truth.........getting to the bottom of journalistic bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson