Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

Posted on Drudge and Smoking Gun: The California recall campaign is officially getting dirty...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 26kdollarwelfaretom; arnold; big10inch; bobmulholland; bustamentebooster; disgusting; drudgethinksfriswhat; gain4inchesovernight; lookingforbooty; moretocome; morons; schwarzenpervert; schwarzenrino; sick; theorgycandidate; vote4character; vote4mcclintock; warningshot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 681-685 next last
To: OldFriend
like greg louganis and rudy galindo
261 posted on 08/27/2003 5:33:42 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
President Bush *NEVER* used illegal drugs. That is a bald-faced *LIE* perpetrated by the *MEDIA*. I am *DISAPPOINTED* that any Freeper would fall for that one.

He was also a virgin until he married.

262 posted on 08/27/2003 5:33:44 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: ejdrapes
It's old news. Let's move on.
263 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:19 PM PDT by zarf (Dan Rather is god.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Do you really want to know or are you being sarcastic?

Briefly I can tell you that we are not to judge a mans soul - nor damn him to hell - only G_d can do that. We are not to judge according to our own righteousness - but instead judge according to the Judgment already made by G_d.

Jesus tells us to judge all things, to judge the fruit of a man, to judge each other in the ways of the Lord. For us to obey Christ and be light we must judge the darkness.

We are to determine right and wrong and stand against wrong.

Many people confuse the meaning of the word Judge when taken out of context or leave out the clarifiers. The Context of Mat. 7 is pretty clear that Judgment of sin is alright, for a non hypocrite

1 Judge not, that ye be not judged.

2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. Mk. 4.24

3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.

6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.



I can give you many chapters and verses if you like, but I doubt you would.
264 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:33 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
The title of this thread is probably a fairly good clue.
265 posted on 08/27/2003 5:34:43 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
What is the point of bringing up something Bill Clinton and his brother did 26 years ago? But Freepers were fixated on Clinton's alleged sex antics of the 1970s and 80s - - - but DON'T TELL US ABOUT ARNOLD, AND THAT'S AN ORDER!

The thing I find most comical is that most young men wants to have sex with as many women as possible (or at least 98% do). Most younger people have smoked pot. The ones that criticize Arnold the loudest about this stuff are just envious. What he did 20 years ago amounts to nothing. He grew up. I wish I coud have had the sex romps he did when I was 29...LMAO

266 posted on 08/27/2003 5:35:49 PM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
"Not Tom McClintock, or most decent conservatives for that matter."

I find it hard to relate to someone who didn't have at least some youthful indescretions, whether it was sex, drinking, smoking pot, whatever.

Citizens who have seen the error of their ways usually make the best leaders.

267 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:22 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
McClintock was probably working hard, obeying the laws, and setting a good example for others.

I hope he managed to have some fun.....

268 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:30 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
So you compare a by-then-married Schwarzenegger lying to clean up his image in a Playboy article in '88 to clinton's politically expedient lies?

Ach!

The only lie that would compare is if at this time during the campaign he lies about it.

Best to be frank and disavow. Clearly his values and lifestyle did in fact change dramatically.
269 posted on 08/27/2003 5:36:37 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Moosefart
Perhaps there is an Arnold Girls Gone Wild video out there...

>>>I wish I coud have had the sex romps he did when I was 29...LMAO
270 posted on 08/27/2003 5:37:54 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt
So you are clearly against Bush and Reagan, not to mention Tom and Myself?

Though I would ask: When have I foisted my intemperance and intolerance your way?
271 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:03 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (SELECT * FROM liberals WHERE clue > 0 .............................................. 0 rows returned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
As for your posting the other thread, I am going to withdraw my charge completely. If I can't prove it, I shouldn't make the charge or voice my opinion. I am sorry. I shouldn't have made the accusation. Your take on that was correct.

Thanks man.

272 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:20 PM PDT by journey7873
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: journey7873
So I suppose we are supposed to say "Oh my God" or something?
273 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:32 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

I do not agree with what you say. His language used in the Playboy interview in 1988 was Clintonian: it gave him an out if you consider pot and hash to be less than "drugs" (speed, coke, heroin, barbituates). He admits to marijuana use today. What part of that don't you understand.

Jesus. The one good thing about McClintock is that he is not as clueless as some of his devoted followers. He'll know when to get out when the getting's good.

This is election for Governor, not for Pope.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

274 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:39 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
McKlintock didn't stop the unions from sucking the money from the state.... I don't care if he goes either... I hear NO politicians saying anything about the number 1 problem in the state: UNIONS
275 posted on 08/27/2003 5:38:49 PM PDT by Porterville (Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777
1. I hope Arnold wasn't bragging, it's very typical of some men to kiss and tell.

2. What role does Gray Davis play in all of this? he is
known to demonize his opponents by digging up dirt on
them.

3. Somebody should have kept Arnold in the closet until his
hormones hit his head.
276 posted on 08/27/2003 5:39:06 PM PDT by Chantal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
That's what I think.....
277 posted on 08/27/2003 5:39:56 PM PDT by OldFriend ((Dems inhabit a parallel universe))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC
I recall Bill Clinton getting a lot of heat for not being candid about his drug use.

Yes, that's what I recall too, in fact it was unbridled laughter at that dumb "didn't inhale" assertion. Smoking a joint in the 60s or 70s was nothing, but in the 90s and 00s suddenly it's a liability? Yes a liablility for current use, but shouldn't be for "in context," if you will, previous use.

278 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:17 PM PDT by Vladivostok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: CyberCowboy777; churchillbuff
I appreciate your reply. I just don't understand how some people feel that they have the right to judge and criticize others that they do not know and then act as if they are perfectly pure.

Sounds like hypocrisy to me.

279 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:39 PM PDT by Eaker (This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

The Dems finally get to show off the one thing they're good at - mudslinging.

280 posted on 08/27/2003 5:40:39 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 681-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson