Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Wrote the Books of the Bible?: New Book Addresses Historical Origins of the Bible
PR Newswire ^ | Feb. 16, 2007

Posted on 02/16/2007 2:06:00 PM PST by Alex Murphy

LAPORTE, Ind., Feb. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- C. Jack Trickler presents a clear and accessible study of the people who wrote the books of the Bible, their motivations and the historical, political and social settings in which they wrote in his new book, "A Layman's Guide to Who Wrote the Books of the Bible?" (now available through AuthorHouse).

Trickler discusses his own theories, as well as those of other religious scholars, to offer a thorough, well-researched argument. "When you get into the Bible, you see enough evidence that the Bible was written by humans that you have to say, 'Well, who wrote it?'" he says. "The books were written by people, and they were compiled by people. If you take the Bible literally ... you're ignoring the fact that the Bible has been translated from language to language to language."

Among Trickler's assertions are that: Mary and Joseph did not travel to Bethlehem for a Roman census; the Gospel of Luke may have been written by a woman; one book says Goliath was slain by David, but another has him slain by Elhanan; and the first five books of the Bible were not written by Moses. "Pretty good if you can write about your own death," he says of the latter.

"A Layman's Guide to Who Wrote the Books of the Bible?" provides intelligent food for thought about how the Bible that exists today came into being. He calls the different sections of his book "conversations," a term borne out through his relaxed writing style.

"Where scholars have offered differing views of biblical matters that affect the determination of authorship, this book presents the various views in laymen's language," says Trickler. Trickler is a Christian layman with an interest in history, particularly the history of Christianity. He served in the military during World War II and then completed a degree in mechanical engineering. He worked for a manufacturer of industrial air-moving equipment, where he held positions in research, engineering management and manufacturing management, and served as the vice president of corporate development. After retirement, Trickler rekindled his interest in the history of Christianity.

He started reading various books for personal enjoyment, and then began making notes and put his conclusions in a logical order. "A Layman's Guide to Who Wrote the Books of the Bible?" is the result of this research.


TOPICS: Religion & Science; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS: aramaic; bible; booksofthebible; coptic; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; greek; hebrew; latin

1 posted on 02/16/2007 2:06:01 PM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Who wrote the Bible?

Why have Muslims been claiming every Religious site in their area?

Meanwhile Mohammad appeared after the Jews and the Christians!

2 posted on 02/16/2007 2:22:12 PM PST by rocksblues (Do unto others as they do unto you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

"the Gospel of Luke may have been written by a woman"

ONE LESS BOOK TO BUY!


3 posted on 02/16/2007 2:24:11 PM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

WHO WROTE THE NEW TESTAMENT?

Luke and Acts are plainly written by the man named Luke who accompanied Paul on his journey. Luke used other works, including the gospels of Matthew and Mark, and possibly first-hand witnessing by others such as the Blessed Virgin Mary, as sources.

Mark was written by John Mark, one of the seventy disciples of Jesus who became a secretary to Peter. Presumably, Mark wrote a gospel under Peter's direction, because Peter, himself, was illiterate.

John, Revelations, and the three epistles of John were written by the disciple, John. Earlier, he had been a disciple of John the Baptist, who belonged to a sect of Jews known as Essenes, who valued Greek literacy very highly. Some of John's writing may borrow from earlier Essene works, including those of John the Baptist.

Matthew was written by the disciple Levi/Matthew, who, as a tax collector, was one of the few literate disciples. According to Irenaeus, his work was originally in Aramaic. His dependency on Mark was probably introduced when the work was translated into Greek.

Paul attests that some of his letters were written in his own hand (Galatians); other letters commonly ascribed to him contain references to multiple authorship, including the work of people such as Tertius (Romans), Sosthenes (1 Corinthians), Timothy (2 Corinithians, Colossians, and Philippians), and Silvanus (1 and 2 Thessalonians with Timothy). The writer of Hebrews is unknown, but it has been presumed to be written under the authority of Paul. I would argue the vastly different style may be because Paul was thinking more like a Jew (code-shifting) when he wrote it.

WHO WROTE THE OLD TESTAMENT?
Moses is traditionally held to be the author of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Deuteronomy is probably a later rescension of the previous three books; It's name, which is only of very recent, Christian origin) and means "second [book of the] law," is a reference to that notion. The addition of certain passages, including Moses' own death, hardly negates the notion that the authority behind it was Moses. It also should seem hardly surprising that Moses' books should echo other existing notions.

The book of Psalms is, by its own internal notations, a compendium of poems from various sources, including King David and later authors. Some of the Psalms even exist in other biblical books.

Certain prophets may be considered the authors of the books ascribed to them. Other prophets' books were written about the prophets by later authors. In fact, the Jews consider the Book of Daniel to be one of the historical books, not one of the books of the prophets, whereas the book of Psalms is included among the books of the prophets.

Ezra, Nehemiah, and 1-2 Chronicles are likely written by the same author, although the identity of that author is unknown. Ezra and Nehemiah previously existed as a single book.

1-2 Samuel and 1-2 Kings are likely written by the same author.

Ruth is thought to be of fairly late authorship, a romantic telling of a history used to establish the origin of the Davidic line.

Joshua was once thought to be of fairly late authorship, but recent archaeological evidence has demonstated an historical accuracy that suggests a remarkable proximity in time to the events described. (A later authorship would not contradict biblical infallibility; if Genesis was, indeed, written by Moses, the events were certainly very distant to Moses.

Like the dueterocanonical book, "the Wisdom of Solomon," it is questionnable whether the attribution of the Song of Songs and Proverbs to Solomon is intended to be literal.

The books of Esther, Job, and the dueterocanonical books appear to have been the last books of the bible written. The authors are unknown. Like Genesis, Ruth, 1-2 Chronicles and 1-2 Samuel, the authors probably did not witness the events firsthand.


4 posted on 02/16/2007 3:24:27 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I wonder who he thinks wrote the book of Hebrews.


5 posted on 02/16/2007 3:27:24 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abishai
I wonder who he thinks wrote the book of Hebrews.

Who cares. If he writes something like

"If you take the Bible literally ... you're ignoring the fact that the Bible has been translated from language to language to language."

then it seems clear to me he doesn't have much of a grasp on what's going on.

Author House appears to be a vanity press.

6 posted on 02/16/2007 3:48:15 PM PST by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field

Now, now. Don't be too harsh on him. He's only a layman who thinks he knows everything.

And in all seriousness. I think Christians would do themselves a service by learning a bit of Biblical Greek and Hebrew. Then there wouldn't be such a big translation issue.

But, then again, you go directly from there into the text issues. Maybe it never ends.


7 posted on 02/16/2007 4:01:41 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dangus

"Luke and Acts are plainly written by the man named Luke who accompanied Paul on his journey. Luke used other works, including the gospels of Matthew and Mark, and possibly first-hand witnessing by others such as the Blessed Virgin Mary, as sources."

GOOD POST DANGUS!

LUKE'S GOSPEL WAS PAUL'S TESTIMONY.

http://www.themoorings.org/apologetics/Gospels/relia3.html

GODSPEED!


8 posted on 02/16/2007 4:24:39 PM PST by alpha-8-25-02 ("SAVED BY GRACE AND GRACE ALONE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

"The books were written by people, and they were compiled by people."

This man doesn't have eyes to see and ears to hear. He reads the Bible as I did when I was very young - looking for any thing to prove how wrong everyone was.

If he is as lucky, or I should say as blessed, as I have been, God will open His Word to him too and he will see the divine inspiration on every page.


9 posted on 02/16/2007 4:43:49 PM PST by Ping-Pong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
It makes no difference what this guy says, nor what any other doubter may say. There is historical evidence that what we have, in what we call God's Word, is, at the very least, the only existing document of its kind, anywhere.

We don't have the originals.

We have more than 5300 manuscripts, with more being discovered every year.

Differences exist for approximately one to two percent of those manuscripts, due to the errors, interpretations, etc. of copiers.

Those differences would not change the message of the Bible in anyway.

The Bible we have today, including all the many translations from the KJV to the NIV to the NLT (and even The Message), form the most historically significant and documented piece of collective writing in existance.

Besides, what other god invites us to come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke fits perfectly, and the burden I give you is light."

For that period of time, and even for now, that is a very un-god like saying.

10 posted on 02/17/2007 8:12:02 AM PST by norge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ping-Pong

"The books were written by people, and they were compiled by people."

"The books were written by people [inspired by God], and they were compiled by people [inspired by God]."


11 posted on 02/17/2007 3:04:10 PM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

Yes, they were. Isn't it wonderful to be able to see that when we read the Bible with understanding?


12 posted on 02/17/2007 3:48:43 PM PST by Ping-Pong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ping-Pong

amen....


13 posted on 02/17/2007 5:52:24 PM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nabber

God wrote "The Book"!


14 posted on 02/17/2007 6:43:12 PM PST by Knute (Tell me again ONE good reason I'm living here in Wisconsin??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Note: this topic is from 2006. Or somethin'.

Blast from the Past.

Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


15 posted on 03/14/2009 8:11:54 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abishai

If you are interested it topics of this nature, go to the nearest college which offers Biblical Greek and Biblical Hebrew and take at least two years of each. The scales may fall from your eyes, and then again maybe not, but you WILL have a much deeper understanding of the Bible. You will still have unanswered questions, but they well be of a more significant nature.


16 posted on 03/15/2009 3:46:01 PM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson