Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exceptions to celibacy rule puzzle priests
cns ^ | March 8, 2010 | Cindy Wooden

Posted on 03/08/2010 9:49:58 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: SnakeDoctor

http://johnshuster.com/thirtynine_popes.htm


21 posted on 03/08/2010 10:30:32 AM PST by spectre ( Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SnakeDoctor
"However, to my mind, that alone does not justify requiring celibacy."

You do realize that celibacy is a prohibition against marriage and is not to be confused with abstinence don't you? Can you explain why the military academies prohibit cadets and midshipmen from marrying?

22 posted on 03/08/2010 10:31:34 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
So...St. Peter abandoned his wife?

Where does Scripture say that peter's wife was alive? oOly his mother in law is mentioned.

23 posted on 03/08/2010 10:31:50 AM PST by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

He did not abandon his wife.

I doubt St Peter was celibate. The requirement for priests is a discipline, not a doctrine. It appears to have been in place since the early Church, but I don’t think it was that early.


24 posted on 03/08/2010 10:33:11 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“More than many married men...”

You just lost credibility. Someone can read a hundred books and hear a million stories, but if they haven’t been married and personally raised the children that are the fruits of a marriage, then they are the farthest thing from an expert. They’re not even an amateur. I have three children and laugh in the face of anyone without children who tries to give me advice.


25 posted on 03/08/2010 10:34:23 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: UriÂ’el-2012
"Yah'shua ended his priesthood requirements in 70CE."

The abstinence requirement is administrative policy, not scriptural and has served God, the Church, and mankind extremely well for centuries. Besides, what concern is it of yours how an organization you don't belong to conducts its affairs? If you really had any concern you would make a legitimate attempt to educate yourself on the Catechism, dogma, and encyclicals of the Church and wouldn't lurk and snipe annonymously from the internet.

26 posted on 03/08/2010 10:37:04 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
Doesn’t change the fact that the Catholic church has been historically one of the most institutionally corrupt and immoral organizations on the face of the planet.

What nonsense. You just outed yourself as a gibbering whackjob.

27 posted on 03/08/2010 10:37:07 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck; vladimir998
You just lost credibility. Someone can read a hundred books and hear a million stories, but if they haven’t been married and personally raised the children that are the fruits of a marriage, then they are the farthest thing from an expert.

Would you apply the same thought process towards your wife's selection of an Ob/Gyn? Or what about a female Ob/Gyn who never gave birth? How well equipped are either of these physicians, to deliver babies?

28 posted on 03/08/2010 10:38:01 AM PST by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“Being celibate has NOTHING to do with raping children!”

Raping children is obviously the opposite of celibacy. However if you are going to challenge that there isn’t a higher population of child sexual abusers in the clergy than the general public, I’ll take you up on it.


29 posted on 03/08/2010 10:38:28 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

>> You do realize that celibacy is a prohibition against marriage and is not to be confused with abstinence don’t you?

I understand what celibacy means in this context — thanks ... though my understanding for priests (not military cadets) is that celibacy included abstinence.

>> Can you explain why the military academies prohibit cadets and midshipmen from marrying?

Can you explain why they don’t prohibit marriage when they’re out of the academies and actually serving? They are committing to not marrying during their training, not during the actual performance of their job duties. It is a temporary commitment, during which cadets are permitted to continue dating and marry upon graduation. This makes sense. Priestly celibacy does not.

SnakeDoc


30 posted on 03/08/2010 10:39:42 AM PST by SnakeDoctor (The night is darkest just before the dawn, but [...] the dawn is coming. -- Harvey Dent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Would you apply the same thought process towards your wife’s selection of an Ob/Gyn? Or what about a female Ob/Gyn who never gave birth? How well equipped are either of these physicians, to deliver babies?”

Of course I would. I would much prefer an Ob/Gyn who had experience delivering babies instead of one who had never done so before. In fact, that is a very good example that supports my argument. Was that a trick question? Or did you not apply your own analogy appropriately?


31 posted on 03/08/2010 10:41:33 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.


32 posted on 03/08/2010 10:42:10 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

“What nonsense. You just outed yourself as a gibbering whackjob.”

Do you really need me to outline in detail the centuries of corruption at the top of the catholic church (note the distinction between leadership and the front lines)? I’m gonna point out that only one of us has made a personal attack (see the vicious insult above). Maybe you should practice what your church preaches.


33 posted on 03/08/2010 10:44:35 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SnakeDoctor
"Priestly celibacy does not."

The Catholic Church requires that married men make their families a higher priority than their vocations. This would require married priests to place the wants and needs of their families above that of their flock which is incompatible with the duties and priorities of the priest.

34 posted on 03/08/2010 10:45:11 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
There's a higher population of child sexual abusers in the clergy American Education system than in the general population. FR has on average one headline a fortnight on the subject.

That's because the American Education system is what's called a targetted institution: one that paedophiles gravitate towards because it puts them in touch with children.

The same is true for any organisation that works with children. Boy Scouts, you name it, they all have more paedophiles than the general norm. Not because the Boy Scouts are evil, but because that's where the children are.

Tell me: do you believe that celibacy is the cause of the ludicrously high level of paedophilia and child abuse in the American Education system?

35 posted on 03/08/2010 10:48:15 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
I would much prefer an Ob/Gyn who had experience delivering babies instead of one who had never done so before.

The question referred to an Ob/Gyn who had never given birth? Never experienced gestation or birth? Should giving birth be a mandatory qualification for an Ob/Gyn?

36 posted on 03/08/2010 10:50:27 AM PST by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Should giving birth be a mandatory qualification for an Ob/Gyn?”

Why would it be? Is part of their job description giving birth? I don’t hire an Ob/Gyn to give birth, I hire them to deliver a baby.


37 posted on 03/08/2010 10:51:55 AM PST by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

Well it also dates back to a time when the Roman Catholic Church was effectively the largest governing body on earth... wives or children of a priest could be the focus or ire and abuse and intimidation.


38 posted on 03/08/2010 10:53:17 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
I don’t hire an Ob/Gyn to give birth, I hire them to deliver a baby.

Of course. And you retain a priest to witness to your marriage. The priest has the experience of marriage from his own parents and the teachings of God.

39 posted on 03/08/2010 10:56:12 AM PST by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Christ was never married either.


40 posted on 03/08/2010 10:56:32 AM PST by BenKenobi (And into this Ring he poured his cruelty, his malice and his will to dominate all life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson