***Paul Harvey:Bill Clinton Spent More Time And Money Going After Bill Gates Than bin Laden***

Stardate: 0110.27

[The Wizard]

In what tells us alot about hillbilly and the others that followed his criminal enterprize from dogpatch, Paul Harvey reported yesterday that the fool spent much more time and money tring to extort money from Bill Gates than he did in trying to get bin Laden, who was responsible for killing a lot more people than Bill Gates......

No one here is surprised......

[SolitaryMan]

According to some people (even here on this forum) Bill Gates and MS are source of all evil. I don't think Bill Gates ever killed anyone, at least it hasn't been proven...

[Quix]

It seems, from some perspectives, there's a lot admirable about the man. . . . he may turn out to be a huge part of the NWO folk. . . .

In any case, in SE Asia, his company is known as utterly ruthless among the professionals who've had to work with it.

[Quix]

. . . THOUGH . . . he may turn out to be a hideous NWO agent

[oldvike]

I don't think Bill Gates ever killed anyone, at least it hasn't been proven...

He's a supporter of Planned Parenthood.

[MizSterious]

I think Bill Gates makes a handy target whenever someone's computer crashes, for reasons that might or might not be related to a Windows product. (Sometimes it's "operator error".)

[Paul Atreides]

Yet, if Livia Rodham runs for Prez in '04 Bill Gates will pour money into her coffers.

[tet68]

Bill Gates has more money than Osama.

[CatOwner]

"Yet, if Livia Rodham runs for Prez in '04 Bill Gates will pour money into her coffers."

Yeah, Gates does have this guilt thing going about the rich needing to pay more taxes.

[MizSterious]

Huh? I hope you're not assuming everyone uses real names for freep id's?

[Paul Atreides]

Who wouldn't?!!

Well, I think Obubba Been Laiden would treat it like he treated the White House sink.

[clee1]

Depends on the what the meaning of "killed" is ... 8^)

I don't care for most MS products, but there is nothing "evil" about Prince William and the Kingdom of Redwood.

[Slyfox]

Is somebody going to call this also an Urban Legend?

[RaceBannon]

I heard him say it yesterday. He was reading one of those e-mails that have been gong around, like the THEN I FORGOT e-mail, and even is posted on the FREEPER CANTEEN USO threads, it is almost the same speech.

[BluesDuke]

According to some people (even here on this forum) Bill Gates and MS are source of all evil. I don't think Bill Gates ever killed anyone, at least it hasn't been proven...

Bill Gates, as a National Review cover headline phrased it well enough, merely built a better or at least more popular mouse trap - so the cats ganged up on him. Welcome to contemporary America.

But the problem we now face viz bin Laden and company goes far beyond Bill Clinton. Never mind Clinton spending more money chasing Gates than bin Laden (and firing like a Keystone Kop on the rare occasions when he might have squeezed off a kill shot, either militarily or diplomatically); how about the U.S. government spending more money (which it extorted from her citizens in the first place) on cradling her citizens to the grave (fellow citizens' rights trampled upon in the process? Oops! Guess that's just the collateral damage you have to bear, but Utopia is worth it!) than on affording her citizens the thing they had the right Constitutionally to expect first and primarily from their government: protection and defence against predators at home (real predators, if you please, not mere vice merchants) and enemies from abroad, while being left the hell alone to live their lives as they saw fit for themselves, so long as they sought not to obstruct or abrogate a fellow citizen's equivalent rights.

I am certain I will not be the only one haunted by the prospect that the slaughter of the innocents in my native city on 11 September could have been (I hardly need to say should have been) prevented.

[lonestar]

In Houston I had a neighbor who would golitely to gay bars.

[ozzymandus]

Exactly! Clinton couldn't extort money from bin Laden, and Bill Gates is a natural target of the jealousy-and-envy mob. (as seen by some of the posts on this thread)

[HighWheeler]

Want to take a stab at the question at the bottom?

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S.military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted dow and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people would be alive today.

So, in view of this, consider this interesting question:

This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question.

There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives hundreds of millions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism.

That being the case, why is it that the US government has spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past ten years than Osama Bin Laden?