Posted on 04/10/2015 3:43:26 PM PDT by entropy12
Walker 15 Bush 12 Carson 11 Cruz 10 Huckabee 10 Paul 9 Rubio 8 Christie 4 Perry 3 Santorum 2 Jindal 2 Kasich 1
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I can predict that you would sit out the election if Walker was the nominee.
Freepers said they would prefer Obama over Santorum? You sure about that?
I think Santorum is a decent man, but he wouldn’t have won the presidency.
I think it’s a very bad idea for Cruzians and Walkerites here to get into a pissing contest at this point in time.
JMHO.
LOL
Walker didn’t inherit a GOP legislature. It had been Dem for several years.
Like Reagan with the U.S. Senate in 1980, it could be argued that Walker brought along the legislature on his coat-tails.
I have never sat out an election. I vote at every opportunity. This year is General Assembly and state Senate.
I don’t always vote for the designated loser of the GOP for President, though.
I voted for Bob Barr in 2008. McAmnesty was unacceptable.
I held my nose for Romney in 2012.
I won’t for Jebster, Rubio, Huckabee, Perry or any of the other cheap labor importers.
Walker still has a chance to convince us he’s on the level with his new stance on illegal aliens.
If we don’t close behind one candidate early Jebster will be nominated. I choose Cruz.
I understand.
“Is that after Cruz announced? Otherwise we will have to hear that it is a crappy poll. Walker so deserves to not only be number one in this poll, but get our nomination and become the President of the United States. He is the one with results which Americans are going to want this time since making the error of picking a talker last round. Americans won’t make that mistake again.”
I will never vote for a pro-amnesty candidate.
As far as I’m concerned, there’s no explanation for backing criminals and the violation of our laws. Someone is either for our laws or not.
Election Eve conversions usually tell us a lot - both about a candidate’s ethics and what they really believe.
I’ve left a state ruined by the illegal invasion. At great cost and loss of income. But it is worth it to be around Americans and hear English spoken. I will never vote for a pro-amnesty candidate, no matter how they spin it. When the entire country is ruined by illegals, there will be no place for us to go.
“We screw America when we don’t take “your” candidate seriously...this forum should have had “your” back and everything would have been fine.”
Sounds like it’s all about nap himself and not the candidate.
Narcissism, anyone?
“we need a candidate who can articulately make his case, and who isn’t afraid to tell the MSM where to go. Cruz is that man, i believe.”
Anyone that can argue in front of the Supreme Court- and win- can articulate his thoughts and be quick on his feet. He can also explain his ideas coherently to the average American without talking down to them.
You don’t find that ability often in politics.
Go Scott Walker!
I agree.
Beautiful Smackdown asell2....that one gonna leave a mark!
Senator Cruz is saying all the right things. I am very happy with his agenda except perhaps he will not deport all illegals. But neither will any of the others running in 2016.
The questions I posit is does senator Cruz have the ability to get other congress critters support him. Has any of his really important proposals passed the senate. In our system unless the congress and the presidents form a consensus thing becomes a law.
You are entitled to express your opinion. I have not seen any anti-Cruz campaign on Fox News.
In which campaign was Reagan known as an amnesty candidate?
Brilliant idea, because it jibes with what I have been saying for months on this forum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.