Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore's works a travesty to documentaries
The Triangle/Student paper of Drexel University ^ | May 28 2004 | Aaron Sakulich

Posted on 06/13/2004 6:41:01 AM PDT by veronica

If you know someone who likes Michael Moore, you know someone who isn't as smart as they think they are. In fact, there's a pretty good chance that they're not even as smart as I think they are, and that says a lot, because I think they're flat-out stupid. In case you've been luckier than I have and don't know who Michael Moore is, he's a grotesque monster of a man who every few years puts out a documentary that people who consider themselves intellectual hail as brilliant.

Michael Moore's movies are nothing so much as they are dishonest. He's constantly saying things that seem intelligent, but on further examination, aren't. For instance, there's a scene in his documentary Bowling for Columbine in which he says to a man in a Lockheed Martin plant, "Columbine happened down the road from this missile factory. Don't you think there's a connection?" When he said this, I thought to myself, "My heavens, it's all so clear! There's a connection between nuclear weapons and the Trench Coat Mafia!" That is, until the guy to whom the question was posed looked at Michael Moore as if he'd just vomited a live snake onto the floor and said, "Not really. We make nuclear weapons to prevent the Soviets from attacking us, and down the road, some kids went insane and shot up a bunch of innocent people."

Every single scene in Michael Moore's films are like this. They seem to be intelligent; they seem to reveal some deep inner truth, but after a few moments of scrutiny, they fall apart. If you've ever taken an organic chemistry class, you know that there's always a guy who sits up front and looks like he knows everything. You also know there's a difference between looking like you know everything and actually knowing everything. Michael Moore is an expert at looking intelligent, not at being intelligent.

Or take, for instance, the statistics Moore uses in Bowling for Columbine. Toward the middle of the movie, the number of gun-related deaths per country flashes across the screen, and because America's is highest, Moore concludes we're all pistol-packing racists. He doesn't, however, mention any of the circumstances from which the numbers come. For instance, in China most policemen are allowed to kill whoever they want for any infraction of the law without a trial. So, technically, every time a person is killed with a firearm, it's an "execution" and not a "murder." Yet according to Moore, China is a safer place than America, because China has zero gun-related murders a year.

These are just two examples of Michael Moore's modus operandi - take some facts and twist, twist, twist and twist them until they resemble what you want them to resemble. It's a shame he's so fond of making films, for he could probably build an origami space shuttle with his twisting and building skills.

In all fairness, however, my opinion could be wrong. Perhaps Moore is right, and something connects Klebold and Harris with Oppenheimer and Von Braun. Even if that's true, he's still a liar. In his book Stupid White Men, Moore recollects a conversation he had with a man named Fred Barnes. Moore said that Barnes had been on The McLaughlin Group complaining that American students don't know what the Iliad and Odyssey are, but when Moore called and put that question to him, Barnes didn't know either. Fred Barnes is an hypocrite, case closed, right? Not quite. The problem is that this conversation, which Michael Moore claims occurred, did not happen. It's all a fat, stinking lie. Fred Barnes claims it never happened, and although Moore's book has plenty of footnotes and source references, there isn't one for the "conversation" he had with Fred Barnes. That's because it's hard to cite something that never happened. As another example, Michael Moore claimed that Disney told him the day before his latest film, Fahrenheit 9/11, was to open, that they weren't going to allow it to be distributed. Moore claimed in the New York Times that he'd been told the reason was because Disney doesn't want to bad-mouth the brother of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who gives Disney substantial amounts of cash every year. Both of these are flat-out lies.

Disney told Moore about the distribution over a year ago. He made these insane claims to try to make it look like "The Man" was trying to silence him. Although he was told that the reason Disney wouldn't distribute it is because of Jeb Bush, he was told that by his agent's brother's pool cleaner or someone, and he was just repeating a rumor he heard. That hardly classifies as true.

If Moore's not above lying directly to the public about things like this in a pitiful effort to drive up sales, what makes the public think that he won't tell them lies in his "documentaries"? No matter what the crowd at Cannes says, his works are terrible to the point of frustrating my attempts to describe how bad they are. You may have heard he won an award recently at the Cannes Film Festival. Somehow, I don't suspect the judges were talking about the subtle use of shadow and contrast, the almost Kafkaesque use of symbology reminiscent of Pynchon's early works during the scene in which Moore talks about how President Bush's library burned down and he wasn't even done coloring all the books when they chose to give him the award. They probably just looked up from the checks they were about to make out to the genocidal madman, Yasir Arafat, saw an unhappy fat man whining about America and unanimously decided to hand over the prize.

Moore is certainly not an artistic genius. The only technical requirement for a documentary is that it isn't blurry, and he's certainly not a documentary-making genius, since it's easy to make documentaries when you cook the data, show one side of the argument and make up lies.

Sometime in the near future, someone is going to tell me that I'm wrong and Michael Moore is the greatest artistic genius ever to walk the face of the earth. Their logic will run along the lines of, "Since you've never made a movie, what right have you to criticize his films?" I may not have made any films, but if I eat at a restaurant and get food poisoning, I don't need to be a five-star chef to complain.

The fact of the matter is this: If you think Michael Moore is fine intellectual fare, you're not thinking enough when you watch his films. If you actually pay to see his movie, which is to say you give someone money to lie to you, I urge you in the strongest possible terms to get a vasectomy, because the world has enough idiots.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bowlingforcolumbine; documentary; michaelmoore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: veronica

Great article and great post, Veronica. Thanks for sharing it with us.

Even though this is one article from a student papoer, it gives me hope that the next generation has more on the ball than we might have thought. I LOVED his line about how Michael Moore twists the facts so much that he could build an origami space shuttle. Too funny!!

True documentary filmmakers should be outraged that Michael Moore is considered one of them. He isn't and is only destroying the genre. Cannes is in self-destruct mode and is losing its prestige as the result of giving awards to crap such as Moore's films.


21 posted on 06/13/2004 7:44:14 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Repeal CFR NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

I have only seen bits of Mickey' work. His show on cable stunk on ice. What little I have seen, made wonder what was the big deal. I have seen film school students due much better with less cashola. So, based on what I have seen of his work, I agree: he is not qualified to shine Leni's shoes.


22 posted on 06/13/2004 7:46:10 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Ronald Reagan - The first anti-terror President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
But why do so many buy the shallow lies of the blubbery boob?
Because Democrats think with their emotions and without logic. That's why they don't see their own flagrant hypocrisy.
23 posted on 06/13/2004 7:48:41 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: just me

Maybe Moore could be Hanoi john's running mate.


24 posted on 06/13/2004 7:49:22 AM PDT by JOE43270 (JOE43270)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maine For Bush
To counteract efforts challenging "Fahrenheit 9/11," he has hired Chris Lehane and Mark Fabiani, two former political advisers to Bill Clinton and Al Gore, to establish a "war room" that will immediately support any claims made in the movie that come under attack.
So, he wants to try to protect his ability to lie and get away with it. [Chris "the ferret" Lehane-- LOL. Only slime like Clinton or Michael the Hutt could hire him.]
25 posted on 06/13/2004 7:51:39 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I beleive this one that Michael Moore actually starred in....

What PROPAGANDIST he is!

26 posted on 06/13/2004 7:51:46 AM PDT by Chieftain (To all who serve and support those who serve - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baseballmom

"Lockheed Martin does not make missiles at that site in Colorado."

You are correct. Anyone who lives in the area knows this.

Moore is just another obese slob with a VHS camera that probably spends his free time sniffing little girl's bicycle seats.


27 posted on 06/13/2004 7:53:22 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
feckless crapweasel

Coffee Spew Alert! LOL

I had a high school english teacher who called me her "feckless lout". I always suspected it didn't mean "favorite pupil."

28 posted on 06/13/2004 8:21:01 AM PDT by OSHA (I refuse to be called uncooperative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Michael Moore is a damned liar.

Michael Moore, the media whore, is absolutely worthless.


29 posted on 06/13/2004 8:30:55 AM PDT by punster (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

This guy sure knows how to generate interest and hype for his movies. I don't think it has even been released yet!


30 posted on 06/13/2004 8:32:08 AM PDT by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Yesterday I went to see "The Chronicles of Riddick" here in Portland, Oregon. I was greeted by a short trailer of Moore's new flick "Fahrenheir 9-11." His film appeared to be very grainy and the clip I saw appeared to contain a collection of chopped-together scenes. One featured President Bush denouncing terrorism and then cut to a scene of GWB hitting a golf drive. Amateur, amateur, amateur . . . pure claptrap, Bovine Squat and arrogant lies. Not very clever, either. Michael Moore is stupid, stupid, stupid!

By the way, I recommend all Freeper sci-fi fans go and see "Riddick." It is a standard action-sci-fi adventure that will take your mind off politics for a while. Vin Diesel is just keeping his fans interested while preparing a sequel to his last blockbuster. Go Diesel! Down with Michael Moore !!!

31 posted on 06/13/2004 8:43:47 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Isn't Bowling for Columbine the one where they showed how 'easy' it was to buy a gun at a gun show...simply walk in, buy, walk out...but they left out the 10-day waiting period and background check?

When it's no longer fashionable to like Michael Moore, Hollywood will drop Michael Moore. He's only around as a court jester. He's too ugly and fat for their tastes.

32 posted on 06/13/2004 8:45:38 AM PDT by Lizavetta (Gun control = hitting your target)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

He's dying...literally everyday. With his weight, I bet he is on max blood pressure medication...and without any lifestyle changes...I doubt if he has more than five years left to live. We may see one more documentary...but thats about it. MM will be history by 2008.


33 posted on 06/13/2004 8:50:39 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I really appreciated Dennis Miller's reference to Michael Moore on his show last week. He said MM is a "pain-in-the-ass slug and needs to have his ass kicked". Exact words. Really cracked me up.


34 posted on 06/13/2004 8:55:33 AM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Michael Moore winning ANY award in the documentary category is a slap in the face to those whose research puts forth a work of facts. I would be utterly insulted if his works won acclaim over my documentary (if I were in that line of work.)


35 posted on 06/13/2004 8:55:46 AM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Hecks

LOL - Ben, tell us what you really think about Mikey!


36 posted on 06/13/2004 8:56:57 AM PDT by Diamondhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: veronica
If you know someone who likes Michael Moore, you know someone who isn't as smart as they think they are.

Anytime anyone I've ever known or met asks me "Have you seen Bowling for Columbine?" I've immediately lost 95% of respect I might have had for them before those words left their mouth.

37 posted on 06/13/2004 8:57:06 AM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA
I had a high school english teacher who called me her "feckless lout". I always suspected it didn't mean "favorite pupil."

Geez, you mean you didn't sue her and the school district for being mean to you?

38 posted on 06/13/2004 8:59:34 AM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Truman Capote IMO was a genius. He invented to some degree, the modern true crime genre. In addition, he was a great writer. An odd man personally, obviously, but a great talent nevertheless IMO.

And he's also rumored to be the real writer of "To Kill a Mockingbird."

39 posted on 06/13/2004 9:22:11 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago
And he's also rumored to be the real writer of "To Kill a Mockingbird."

A great book on Capote, that covers that rivalry, (between Capote and Harper Lee) - is Capote, by Gerald Clarke. Unusually fine biography. I don't believe it rumor by the way. But Capote was very annoyed that his life-long friend made such a splash with Mockingbird, which became an instant American classic.

40 posted on 06/13/2004 9:41:07 AM PDT by veronica (Viva la Reagan revolution....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson