Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazing Footprint (photo)
freerepublic.com ^ | October 21, 2004 | Crushelits

Posted on 10/20/2004 9:42:27 PM PDT by crushelits

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: TASMANIANRED

Navigation:
first <-------click here: Bottom of page


41 posted on 10/20/2004 10:01:17 PM PDT by uncleshag (Send the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Foot that big, the kid must be 2 1/2 feet tall, and weigh a good 40 pounds!


42 posted on 10/20/2004 10:01:25 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
oh wow! reminiscent of the movie Aliens! weird!
43 posted on 10/20/2004 10:02:13 PM PDT by AbramsGunnerE5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamaly
I nicknamed my youngest son "Thumper" for all the times his little foot kicked me and woke me up! Never saw any of my kid's little tootsies, but have seen many an elbow, foot or knee traveling around mama's belly.

Nam Vet

44 posted on 10/20/2004 10:02:22 PM PDT by Nam Vet (MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
It`s obviously a fake because for the toes and the outline of the muscles and bone of the foot to show so clearly like that, the foot would literally have to be right at the top of the womans skin which is inconceivable. That would mean that not only would the child have broken through the uterus, but also her stomach muscles and stomach fat and lower skin layer. It`s inconceivable.


45 posted on 10/20/2004 10:02:49 PM PDT by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

If this is real (not) it's a breach baby feet first.


46 posted on 10/20/2004 10:03:00 PM PDT by rightgrafix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Rainmist

That pic, tho, looks like a Planned Parenthood poster or something ....


47 posted on 10/20/2004 10:03:36 PM PDT by Rainmist (Proud to be GenerationReagan !!!! I miss you Daddy ! 03/22/18 - 07/25/96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Ok, here is all I know about that picture. This was e-mailed to me a month ago by my best friend. She told me this was her sister-in-law. The mom is very thin and has little to no body fat. This is the only way this can even be close to a real picture. I will check in the morning again and make sure this story is true.


48 posted on 10/20/2004 10:04:06 PM PDT by spotbust1 (Gun control is when you use both hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

;-)


49 posted on 10/20/2004 10:04:26 PM PDT by Selkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

why daughter kicked where huge lumps would form on my wife's(x-wife now) stomach but could not see fingers or toes...


50 posted on 10/20/2004 10:04:43 PM PDT by AbramsGunnerE5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
It's impossible for the foot to show in such detail because it not only has to press through skin, which is pretty thick at that point, but also a layer of subcutaneous fat, thick muscle, and the uterine wall. A baby is very, very well protected in the uterus. If the wall separating baby from outside world were really tissue thin, as shown here, a baby would be in jeopardy every time Mom bumped into something with her protruding tummy.

Anyway, the structure of the foot is wrong--the ball of the foot isn't done correctly.

I am a mother of two, both of whom were violent kickers. When my first (nine-and-a-half pound) child was trying for a field goal, I could see a slight lump on the surface of my stomach, but no toes! And when I was in grad school had occasion to cut up a female corpse for my gross anatomy class. That's where I get my information about what's inside a woman's abdomen.

51 posted on 10/20/2004 10:04:50 PM PDT by Capriole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Obviously not many mothers or fathers around here.

I have had four sons and worked in OB for years. I've seen a gravid uterus inside and out plenty of times. The only way to even feel a foot that well is if the woman has a ruptured uterus and the mother is thin. You can see very distinct bumps but not a foot print like this.

52 posted on 10/20/2004 10:05:29 PM PDT by armymarinemom (Children and kids don't wear wings or blood stripes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

If this is a real photo - there is something very bad wrong.


53 posted on 10/20/2004 10:05:48 PM PDT by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States

You have seen your wife's womb?
Fascinating.


54 posted on 10/20/2004 10:07:45 PM PDT by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Interesting. The abdomin appears to be as thin as tissue paper. No fat. No muscle. No uterine wall. Get this woman to a doctor fast; other than the child, she's as hollow as a ping-pong ball.


55 posted on 10/20/2004 10:09:17 PM PDT by John Jorsett (Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits; All
Seems to me everyone is discussing if this is real or fake. Is that really the point?

Is not the real point the fact that a baby in the womb is real?

And that if Kerry and the Dems have their way, then that baby could be aborted up to and including the end of the third trimester?

56 posted on 10/20/2004 10:09:42 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (John F. Kerry, Man of the people: "Sometimes I drink.............tap water")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona

Yeah, they wear big shoes.


57 posted on 10/20/2004 10:09:50 PM PDT by shibumi (HELP! HELP! We've lost our accordian and can't shoot the ducks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
Interesting photoshop. The amniotic sac would be empty of all fluids, the muscular uterine wall would be broken through, the Mother would have no fat layer under her many layers of skin and that foot is larger than the size of a normal newborn.

Then again, maybe it's Bigfoot?

58 posted on 10/20/2004 10:09:50 PM PDT by bd476
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Sometimes it creeped me out to feel my wife's belly while our daughter swirled around in there. I had visions of the pods in Alien!

Imagine how your wife felt with that going on!

59 posted on 10/20/2004 10:10:00 PM PDT by SuziQ (Bush in 2004-Because we MUST!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: error99

Dont tell her she would be embarrassed.


60 posted on 10/20/2004 10:10:16 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson