Skip to comments.
Man killed on American Airlines flight
Denver Rocky Mountain News ^
| December 7, 2005
| Associated Press
Posted on 12/07/2005 1:57:21 PM PST by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: JamesP81; wideawake
Perhaps you're off your meds.And if you are, please, stay clear off the airports!
61
posted on
12/07/2005 2:49:39 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: FlipWilson
In one corner, you will have the 9/11 Commission members spouting that this is proof we are not prepared. Actually, it somewhat demonstrates the opposite, so that argument won't fly (and, by the way, neither should lunatics) - except maybe on DU.
62
posted on
12/07/2005 2:51:51 PM PST
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: 101st-Eagle
To get the 7 to 10 percent number you would have to know how many mentally disturbed people that there are in the total world population. So 7 to 10 percent of how many?
63
posted on
12/07/2005 2:51:57 PM PST
by
Dave278
To: Graybeard58
Sorry it had to turn out the way it did, but the woman should have never allowed her Husband to try and board a plane in that condition, especially after 9/11.
A hard lesson learned.
64
posted on
12/07/2005 2:53:16 PM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
To: Graybeard58
Sounds like the som beech needed killin!!
65
posted on
12/07/2005 2:53:39 PM PST
by
RVN Airplane Driver
(Most Americans are so spoiled with freedom they have no idea what it takes to earn and keep it.)
To: Graybeard58
Sorry - meant "the wife of the man"
66
posted on
12/07/2005 2:54:51 PM PST
by
GianniV
To: Almondjoy; RonF
I guess your parents are still responsible for everything you do too huh?You miss the point, AlmondJoy.
A caregiver may be found civilly liable for the actions of someone in their care if they were negligent.
Courts in MI and CA have rendered judgments against the psychiatrists and the parents of mentally ill individuals who harmed others because caregivers have neglected to take proper precautions or have failed to warn others.
In the MI case, I believe that it was parents who knew their mentally ill son had a violent history, yet they left a firearm where he could easily reach it and he shot a neighbor.
To: msnimje
---2005 version of "No yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater!"---
Stephen Wright: I once walked into a crowded firehouse and yelled "movie!"
68
posted on
12/07/2005 2:56:44 PM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Bad Lawmakers = Bad Law = Infinite Lawyers)
To: 101st-Eagle
"I find yours even more disturbing---- Only 7-10% of mentally ill patients have violent histories-most are intoverted, isolate, or are reponding therapeuticaly to medication--- We have a very skewed perception of this populace" Your observations about some boneheads on this thread who callously joked about or ridiculed mental illness are right on the mark. It's hard to understand that in these times there are still people who think only body parts like hearts, kidneys, lungs and livers can become diseased, but not brains. To them, when a diseased or malfunctioning brain occurs it should be laughed at or looked down upon. Marginalizing or ridiculing people who endure mental illness is the pinnacle of immaturity.
The air marshal made an excellent decision, anything less and he would have been negligent in his duties, but there is no need to make condescending remarks about "shipping mentally ill passengers by bus or Fed X". Thanks for your post, 101st-Eagle.
69
posted on
12/07/2005 2:56:48 PM PST
by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: Tx Angel; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Czar; Spiff; HiJinx; Itzlzha; Stellar Dendrite; bitt; ...
--
- Rigoberto Alpizar
- 44 years old
- His photo is on MSNBC right now
- Traveling with his wife
- Allegedly a US citizen
- Flew in from Medellin Columbia
- (a really great vacation spot!)
- "I have a bomb!"
- Must have been reaching for 'legal' 4" scissors
--
What a shockeroo!
--
- Born in the USA?
- Criminal record?
- If not - Entered the USA legally and when?
- If naturalized as a US citizen - When & where?
--
- "Off his meds" his wife sez -
- Buenos nachos & salsa Rigoberto!
--
I wonder how many young Muslim men will now still try to scare passengers or act strangely on flights now?
70
posted on
12/07/2005 2:57:52 PM PST
by
devolve
(<--- (--------(--do not check out my tame FR home page--)-------)
To: All
The air marshal did exactly what he was supposed to do.
It is now time for us, the public, to rally behind the air marshal for doing his job.
Now we are going to have the looney left jump up and down with outrage.
Don't forget the moonbat wexler is from that area of florida.
To: FlipWilson
This story will serve as the perfect illustrator of the no win situation Bush is in. In one corner, you will have the 9/11 Commission members spouting that this is proof we are not prepared. In the other corner you will have the ACLU and the libs ranting that this person's due process rights were violated and that marshals should not be allowed on planes.And in a third corner you'll have the self-styled "real" conservatives who will find something about this incident with which to bash GWB and/or Republicans.
72
posted on
12/07/2005 2:59:26 PM PST
by
Wolfstar
("In war, there are usually only two exit strategies: victory or defeat." Mark Steyn)
To: OldFriend
Wolf is stretching it...if the guy is an American citizen, he knows English.
People with mental conditions go on planes all of the time. Maybe this man was suicidal and wanted to get shot.
To: Mr. Lucky
Nice shooting! Wonder is this mental patient's name is Achmed??
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
74
posted on
12/07/2005 3:02:16 PM PST
by
bray
(Merry Christ-x)
To: wideawake
Well I don't believe that it says anywhere that he was in her care.
To: bcsco
I agree. I'm not sure responses in this post rejoice in the death of the individual as much as they rejoice in the fact that air marshals did "what I had to do, Festus". Air marshals can't take a chance that someone may not be serious in their threats. It is sad that a life had to be taken. On the other hand, how many lives could have been saved had this been a real threat? No one can answer that, yet it is something that, post 9/11, must be considered. I don't rejoice in a death, yet I do rejoice in the fact that our defenses have apparently worked. Yes, it may have been an innocent person killed(all the facts aren't in), but that's really beside the point. I myself am on numerous medications to preserve my life (if I don't take them I die...I wouldn't be a threat). I know the consequences of my actions should I not take them. The individual killed (or his wife) should certainly have known the possible consequences of not taking the medications prior to flight. There is no excuse for someone ignoring common sense. He and his wife are responsible, and should be held accountable.
I agree 100% with everything that you just said. Hopefully, wideawake won't decide you're not taking your meds, like he has in my case.
76
posted on
12/07/2005 3:06:27 PM PST
by
JamesP81
To: SengirV
"Shouldn't they perhaps have wondered how he got the aleged "bomb" through security?
Uhhh, no. Have you seen the screeners?"
Actually, the screeners aren't the problem. Plastic explosives are. Seems there isn't any reliable detection method. Comforting, isn't it?
As to the incident, the Air Marshall did his job. There was no way to know if this was a legitimate threat or not. I feel very sorry for the poor man and his wife though, and am disappointed at some of the thoughtless jokes on this thread.
77
posted on
12/07/2005 3:09:43 PM PST
by
khnyny
(Merry Christmas)
To: Almondjoy
Well I don't believe that it says anywhere that he was in her care.He was ill and she is his wife.
You don't need some kind of "caregiver's certificate" to prove in civil court that he relied on her at least in part for help with his disease.
If he had a history of kidney problems, was off his kidney meds and suddenly collapsed on the floor with kidney failure and she didn't call 911, no one would buy that her failure to contact health professionals was OK because she wasn't his doctor.
The husband was having a serious medical problem and she didn't alert authorities until he had already started a dangerous incident.
She had important knowledge that could have saved his life and she withheld it, endangering her husband and others.
To: JamesP81
Hopefully, wideawake won't decide you're not taking your meds, like he has in my case.I won't, because bcsco has not seconded your preposterous assertion that posters were "rejoicing" in this guy's death.
To: RasterMaster
Rigoberto Alpizar, from CNN
80
posted on
12/07/2005 3:19:12 PM PST
by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson