Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neoconservatives: The new hippies
Daily Colonial ^ | Wednesday, February 22 2006 | Danny Kampf

Posted on 02/28/2006 8:46:11 PM PST by jb6

Edited on 02/28/2006 11:09:58 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last

1 posted on 02/28/2006 8:46:15 PM PST by jb6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GermanBusiness; Igor M; ausrus; Hill of Tara; Timedrifter; Alex-DV; ValenB4; truemiester; ...

As I've always said, Neoconservatism is not Conservatism.


2 posted on 02/28/2006 8:46:44 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6

What you say???


3 posted on 02/28/2006 8:54:01 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6

I am proud to call myself a paleoconservative :)


4 posted on 02/28/2006 8:54:40 PM PST by Hill of Tara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6
What a load of Friggin crap, Now we have people here agreeing with flaming Liberals like this goof ball who wrote this nonsense. Anybody who witnessed the hippie movement of the 1960's could never draw the conclusions that this liberal has.

Not to mention that if this administration was so NeoCon, why isn't Bill Crystal (THE KING OF NEOCONS) serving as the National Security adviser?

5 posted on 02/28/2006 8:56:24 PM PST by MJY1288 (THE DEMOCRATS OFFER NOTHING FOR THE FUTURE AND THEY LIE ABOUT THE PAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
You are correct, IMO. Look at this bit:

It inherently rejects both “Fortress America” isolationism and Kissingerian realism in favor of an activist foreign policy of promoting human rights ...

Exactly what I don't like about it. The problem with that, is that such a policy cannot possibly succeed.

6 posted on 02/28/2006 8:57:35 PM PST by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jb6
You're absolutely right. They are -- and always have been -- big-government globalists whose silly, utopian world view is an outgrowth of too many years spent in academia and Beltway think tanks.

". . . the dumbest f#cking guy on the planet."
--- General Tommy Franks, on Douglas Feith (former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy)

7 posted on 02/28/2006 8:57:47 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
. . . why isn't Bill Crystal (THE KING OF NEOCONS) serving as the National Security adviser?

That's simple. He never stood a chance of getting a position in this administration, since he supported John McCain in 2000.

8 posted on 02/28/2006 8:59:39 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Not just how many of those big wig Neocon brainiacs ever served in the military or how many of their kids ever did. Easy to talk about empire and sending others' sons off when you've never had to do it yourself.


9 posted on 02/28/2006 9:00:18 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Ha! It is the spreading of democracy, et al, so long as it serves our strategic interests. This is not difficult to understand. You can either pretend that isolationism is a valid avenue like Buchanan, or you can live in reality and actively bend the world to your advantage. This isn't charity.
10 posted on 02/28/2006 9:01:14 PM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: jb6
should i start calling every person on this forum comrade from now on? i'm confused.
12 posted on 02/28/2006 9:02:58 PM PST by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

I guess Washington and the Founding Fathers were fools in your eyes?


13 posted on 02/28/2006 9:04:41 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: jb6
As a liberal, I’d say I agree with that doctrine almost in its entirety. But if that’s the case, why is it that I almost always find myself at odds with the policies of the first neoconservative administration ever: the Bush Administration?

Quit drinking the bong water for a start.

15 posted on 02/28/2006 9:05:47 PM PST by quantim (Always aligned, never maligned, but sometimes out of phase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

It was George Washington who warned to serve by example and not to bring our form of government by the bayonet. Besides which, as anyone who served day one in the Army knows, page one Soldiers Common Task Manual: America is not a democracy, it is a Representitive Republic.


16 posted on 02/28/2006 9:06:00 PM PST by jb6 (The Atheist/Pagan mind, a quandary wrapped in egoism and served with a side order of self importance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jb6

How tall do you want that wall?

17 posted on 02/28/2006 9:06:16 PM PST by M203M4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jb6
in favor of an activist foreign policy of promoting human rights and propagating democracy.

We can't have that. This neocon can't pass as a hippie because I don't have enough hair left. But I can pass as one with a sense of morality that does not stop at the nation's shore. The lone superpower to ignore evil abroad is a superpower without moral meaning. Plus the globe is an interconnected place, with foreign viruses easily capable of migrating.

Call me a neocon, call me a liberal, call me what you want. I don't care. All I care about is my conscience.

18 posted on 02/28/2006 9:07:00 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Amen. same here. Ronald Reagan would very much approve.


19 posted on 02/28/2006 9:08:36 PM PST by bayourant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Absolutely right. And anyone who thinks these morons are "conservative" in any sense of the word might want to harken back to that infamous debate in February 2005 between Howard Dean and prominent neo-conservative Richard Perle . . .

Perle: "Chairman Dean, let me congratulate you on your election as chairman of the Democratic National Committee. The Democrats in their wisdom looked at the condition of the Democratic party and chose a physician to lead them. I say that as a Democrat, as a "Scoop Jackson" Democrat, and I look forward to the day when the Democratic Party will nominate a candidate whose views on national security are such that I can return to voting for Democratic candidates."

Oh, yeah . . . this guy's a real conservative.

20 posted on 02/28/2006 9:09:14 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson