Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush is the Ring Leader of Plot to Grant Amnesty
American Chronicle ^ | May 26, 2007 | Tony Dolz

Posted on 05/27/2007 12:51:45 AM PDT by Politicalmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last
To: Do Be
We are great because we are (or were) a country of laws, not men..................We should change that to read "a country of lawyers", they are everywhere, saturating our governmental offices and generally influencing almost every aspect of our daily lives. "Come one come all, you can make big bucks in this country, don't need no English, don't need no legality, just sue anyone, their Gumm'nt will even help you do it!
61 posted on 05/27/2007 1:11:40 PM PDT by Eighth Square
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AuntB; All

My NEXT phone call to Senators Voinovich and Brown:

Hello, My name is Kimberly ..... and I would like to leave a message for Senator......

“Oh, its you, again” (I’m just waiting for THAT response!)

Yes, it’s me...I’d like to know if Senator Voinovich is aware that there are far more than 12 million illegal aliens in this country already and it is clear that our government’s use of that number is entirely meant to mislead the public.

“Is that your message?”.

Yes, I resent continuing to be treated as if I’m stupid. Apparently our Senators aren’t aware that Homeland Security has reported that 10 million illegal aliens entered the country just last year alone?

“That it?”

No. Actually, it isn’t...I’d also like you to give this message to Senator V. as well, so please take this down....Senator V., are you aware that according to the 2000 census, 18,785,867 was the total populations combined of Wyoming, Dist of Columbia, Vermont,...are you writing this down?

“Yes ma’am”

Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Delaware.

“Is there more”

Yes. Montana, Rhode Island, Hawaii, and New Hampshire. Are you still writing this down?

“Yes mam”

Maine, Idaho, Nebraska, West Virgina, New Mexico AND AND Nevada. Now, can you read that message back to me, I’d like to make certain that before Senator Voinovich passes AMNESTY for illegal aliens, that he knows EXACTLY the extent to which he is destroying this country. Go ahead, I’m listening....


62 posted on 05/27/2007 1:39:56 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....lframerica.com.....MARCH TO TAKE BACK AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Oh, that’s perfect, Kimberly!


63 posted on 05/27/2007 1:41:43 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Basically what we’re talking about is building infrastructure on demand for the population of at LEAST 17 STATES!

You know all those jobs everyone keeps saying only aliens will do? We wouldn’t need to supply the JOBS if we didn’t have the ALIENS! It’s them we’re building schools, houses, clinics, Mosques, MEXICAN consulates on and on for. And there is about enough of them working agriculture to produce some of the food they eat.

Any one who says 20 plus million people is not a drain on your resources is INSANE! But it won’t be only 20 million, it will result in 80 million if other amnesties show us anything.


64 posted on 05/27/2007 1:54:56 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I’m posting your post#62 as a vanity.

Reality needs to sink in. :<)


65 posted on 05/27/2007 1:58:16 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

“Here’s quite an old article from the 2000 campaign that I found illuminating on Bush’s motives and reasoning. It seems many have forgotten what platform he ran for office on: “

Where is anything he ever said that would have foretold his complete destruction of our immigration laws?


66 posted on 05/27/2007 2:02:19 PM PDT by FReepapalooza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG; AuntB

Your post is spot on!


67 posted on 05/27/2007 2:02:23 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Excellent! It really gives context to the numbers.
Thanks for posting.


68 posted on 05/27/2007 2:03:33 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Bingo!


69 posted on 05/27/2007 2:06:44 PM PDT by FReepapalooza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

review


70 posted on 05/27/2007 2:07:55 PM PDT by sauropod ("An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools." Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Sure...and tweak however....it was off the top of my head...but wouldn’t it be great if everyone called in and did generally the same thing!

Also...be sure to add your post above...what you’ve said makes PERFECT sense, especially after watching the famous ‘gumball’ immigration video...did you see it?...I remember a statistic that said something like...if we keep up this pace, we will have to build a school a week in California alone, in order to keep up!! Wasn’t that what I heard? AMAZING!!!


71 posted on 05/27/2007 2:18:21 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....lframerica.com.....MARCH TO TAKE BACK AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RodgerD

Bye bye, troll


72 posted on 05/27/2007 3:23:50 PM PDT by Lead Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace

2 thumbs up!


73 posted on 05/27/2007 4:46:24 PM PDT by Petruchio (Out to Lunch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Hmm....you are talking alot about whoppers. Must have some kind of bizarre Burger King thing going on.

“Only in the minds of the reconstructionist globalists and communists is the idea that a man is elected to the presidency to ‘craft is views’ into policy!”

That is exactly what happens isn’t it? The candidate runs on whatever views and ideas he/she believes will be successful and make the nation/state/county/city/village better. If people do vote for that individual then it is a presumption that that person’s views are acceptable to the majority of the electorate isn’t that true? Thus (I know, this is plain spoken logic but please try to follow along)the majority of the voters have provided their authority for the candidate to implement whatever plan they campaigned on.

Now let’s put this all together for ya! Bush campaigned on a number of major points..War on Terror, the Economy, Immigration Reform, Social Security reform, etc.

The War on Terror as a whole is going rather well all things considered. The situation in Iraq has been mangled pretty badly...but we need not look too far back in to history to see examples where other presidents have encountered major problems with war fighting, but they did not turn tail and run, act like a bunch of snivelling cowards. They kept working hard to find the right combination of leadership and strategy that would lead to victory. President Lincoln suffered through signifciant incompetance in the leadership of the Union army before finally finding Generals like Grant and Sherman to finish that fight. President Roosevelt also faced daunting challenges in WWII, and he lived long enough to see fortunes change thanks to the tireless work and dedication of the American people. Vietnam was not a military defeat, it was a politcal defeat that never, EVER should have happened. Bush has shown the courage to stick it out through tough times in Iraq...and that patience and confidence in our troops is paying off - despite the best efforts of a bunch of defeat oriented congresscritters.

The failure of social security reform was more a failure of a Republican Congress to do the right thing. Energy Policy? Same problem...Bush made sound suggestions for improving our energy situation, it was a linguine-spined Congress that failed to act with authority to make important legislation that would have had long term benefits to our energy needs.

The economy....what’s our unemployment rate? How many new businesses have started since Bush’s tax cuts took office? Isn’t federal tax revenue up by a significant margin thanks to tax cuts?Yes, there are troubling signs of pending problems, but how many of them are directly related to anticpated democrat legislation to increase federal regulations, increase taxes, increase the minimum wage, so on and so forth.

Is Bush responsible for some of the challeges we face? Sure, he the POTUS and much of what is going on could have been better handled. But you sound like Bush is to blame for every problem and every failure...and frankly he’s not. Bush AND Congress have a great deal to answer to. Bush, however, doesn’t have too much longer to worry about all these things does he? Yet, many Dims, and apparently a few alleged republicans seem to think Bush is running for a 3rd Term. He’s not folks.

We do need to fight with all our energy and ability those policies and proposed articles of legislation that are not conservative, but we also need to focus less on Bush and more on who we choose to support for making sure the Dims don’t get the White House in 2008. In my book, Duncan Hunter, Fred Thompson, and Newt (maybe....he’s made me a lil nervous as of late)are the best opportunity for bringing a true conservative view into the Oval Office. However if the nation elects another moderate like Bush to the White House, then that POTUS will have been authorized by the American people to offer solutions to the problems the nation faces that are based upon what they campaigned on.

74 posted on 05/27/2007 5:20:39 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Norman Arbuthnot

“... Of course, Bush wasn’t on ballot in 06 so voters took out their frustration on the Repulican congress.”

I can’t argue that what you have said is true. However, Congress had before it legislation on things like Bush’s energy policy that was a very strong recommendation for change...they failed on key points of that plan, especially ANWAR. The GOP Congress certainly helped with cutting it’s own throat on the immigration issue as well..and apparently the secure the borders first message did not sink in with far too many GOP Senators and House members. Bush, true to form, is sticking to his guns on immigration. Given that he’s not worried about re-election, and congress is...we need to checkmate the illegal immigration amnesty crap in Congress.


75 posted on 05/27/2007 5:35:03 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL
The candidate runs on whatever views and ideas he/she believes will be successful and make the nation/state/county/city/village better.

In communist Russia perhaps, but in a free country the candidate runs to continue the protection of rights won for us by those who fought the American Revolution. To make things 'better' means to take away the rights of people to determine on their own what they want to make their lives better.

Every candidate you named is an open border shill for the Council on Foreign Relations, one of the corrupting organizations that have put America's future in extreme jeopardy. The fact that you favor any one of these men shows that your allegience lies with the internationalists who are destablizing the globe and transforming America into an 'idea' instead of a place, as GW is wont to say.
76 posted on 05/27/2007 5:38:20 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

09/11 was not Bush’s fault - you are beginning to sound a bit like Rosie.

Bush’s performance on the over all War on Terrorism issue since then has been nothing short of brilliant. Has the Bush Admininstration made mistakes in Iraq...well obviously they have, but I firmly believe that we would be in far worse shape with algore or Kerry in office.

The illegal immigration issue is critical to our protecting ourselves from more terrorism, and as such Bush is just being incredibly stupid about this....but we can also say with all fairness that our federal government has done an excellent job at stopping terrorist attacks against us since 09/11.


77 posted on 05/27/2007 5:43:31 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL
09/11 was not Bush’s fault - you are beginning to sound a bit like Rosie.

Why are you deliberately misstating my comments?

This is a common disinformation technique used by the Soviet Union. Let's not be dishonest, shall we? Surely your position can be supported by the truth, and not propoganda techniques?
78 posted on 05/27/2007 5:48:38 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Do Be

I am a police officer actually. We do select what laws to enforce on a daily basis. Less because of personal reasons and more for reasons of a practical nature. Not because we are bad cops, but because we just can’t possible enforce all of the laws all of the time.

Bush is simply following up on what he said he would do, he’s not been shy about discussing his support for the guest worker program. He’s refusing to call it anmesty but we all know it is. He was elected even though he clearly wanted to bring about immigration reform based upon the model of a guest worker program that he has discussed.

I, for one, an not given to panic or over reacting to the present situation. We are not powerless to address the situation, as some seem to be saying. We need to press Congress to reject any immigration reform until border security is acheived and sustainable. Then let’s discuss each point of immigration reform and see what can be worked out. I can tell you this, the likelyhood of every single illegal alien being booted out of the country isn’t realistic at all. It would be nice to be sure, but the logistics would be a nighmare. Instead, a great way to address the problem is to turn the heat up, way way up, on employers who hire illegals. Once the job marked for these guys dries up a bit, the flow of illegals into the US will slack off considerably.


79 posted on 05/27/2007 5:55:02 PM PDT by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL
can you imagine how awful things would be with Algore or F’n Kerry in the Oval Office?

No difference. So why bother voting (R)? When (R) values are actually (D)?

80 posted on 05/27/2007 5:59:18 PM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson