Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

e-mail from Fred: "Where we are, and where we're going"
email ^ | July 26, 2007 | Fred Thompson

Posted on 07/26/2007 1:03:09 PM PDT by RobFromGa

In the past few months, I've traveled the country talking and listening to folks. I've been discussing where I see America going, about what we need to do to keep our nation secure, what we must do to keep this remarkable economy growing, and the challenges we must address together for the next generation of Americans.

I believe the United States is at a crossroads, and what I'm hearing on the road is that a lot of people agree with me. They're ready to move forward together to meet our challenges here at home and abroad. They aren't buying into the defeatist talk about our security, our economy, and our future.

During this "testing the waters" effort we've undertaken, I've been saying the political waters feel pretty warm. It's allowed us to start laying the foundation of a good team across the country and to keep up this national conversation we've been having. Now we're going to take that conversation to a different level.

On Tuesday, August 7th, we're inaugurating a new weekly "I'm With Fred" email, complete with news, updates, and photos from the road. We're also working on the ImWithFred website 2.0, in order to keep in touch on a daily basis and to give you more opportunities to join us at events, help us organize, and spread the word about our efforts.

I'm excited about what I'm seeing out on the road. I appreciate everything you're doing for our effort.

Sincerely,

Fred Thompson


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last
To: indylindy
Well, its about time. He is losing supporters by hiring Bush people and waiting till he feels like it.

I don't mind the hiring of Bush people, so much, since some of them are pretty decent. I can't remember his name, but he hired one of the authors of Bush's original tax cuts.

I understand how frustrating it is to wait, though, for Fred's announcement. Right now I support him because he seems to have a good understanding of Conservative ideas (and can articulate them very well.) For me, that is test #1, and he passes with flying colors.

When Fred finally announces I will reevaluate my support of him based on test #2, his policy platform. Until that happens, I happily support him based on test #1.

61 posted on 07/26/2007 1:52:35 PM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I can't figure this whole Thompson v. Hunter thing out. I prefer Hunter's credentials and philosophy but think Thompson is more capable of winning. I'm pulling for both of them and wouldn't think to insult anyone for backing certain candidates at this point.

The main thing is to beat Hillary. I will vote for Rudy against Hillary if push comes to shove.

62 posted on 07/26/2007 1:53:05 PM PDT by MattinNJ (I'm pulling for Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter-...but I'd vote for Rudy against Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

How many “free throws” does Fred get from his supporters?


63 posted on 07/26/2007 1:53:16 PM PDT by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I concur this “Defender of the Melting Pot” award appears to be a complete fabrication by National Review. All other mention is after that article, none before. And the La Raza award to congresscritters is called the Capital Award.


64 posted on 07/26/2007 1:53:44 PM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

“Then ask the obvious: why are so many FReepers willing to throw rabid support to someone who won’t tell them specifically what he would do if elected?”

His past, both words and deeds. He’s the most conservative, electable candidate we have and to believe otherwise defies rational.


65 posted on 07/26/2007 1:53:52 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
I won’t say only source, but it seems to be the most original source.. As you can see from the links, there isn’t even anything listed on LaRaza’s own site about that award.. it’s just odd and, imho, it would be in people’s best interest to check before jumping off a cliff.. just like a lot of other ‘facts’ we found out weren’t true..
66 posted on 07/26/2007 1:54:01 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Then ask the obvious: why are so many FReepers willing to throw rabid support to someone who won't tell them specifically what he would do if elected? Why are they committing early and passionately to someone who refuses to return the favor?

A perfectly valid question. See reply 61.

67 posted on 07/26/2007 1:54:03 PM PDT by The Blitherer (What would a Free Man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The source was linked in my post: a National Review article by Mark Krikorian (Center for Immigration Studies) from Aug. 2005.

And there is no mention of that award prior to that article. No mention on the La Raza website. The award they give to congresscritters is called the Capital Award.

68 posted on 07/26/2007 1:55:16 PM PDT by dirtboy (Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

I can understand that point of view. I like Fred on his merits, not because I think he’s better positioned to win (which I also believe). And his number one merit, to my way of thinking, is that he is an extremely articulate conservative, which is what we need. After 8 years of a basically good guy stumbling over his reasons for defending America from the treason of the left, we need someone who can tell the world WHY.


69 posted on 07/26/2007 1:55:42 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Sounds like Krikorian and the NRO might be having a Dan Rather moment.
70 posted on 07/26/2007 1:56:23 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I wonder if it was a ‘joke’ award at some conference because, you’ll see in one link, they discuss Abraham’s enacting ‘over a dozen new strict immigration security measures’..
71 posted on 07/26/2007 1:56:44 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Cheney maybe, but it’s the DU and the rest of the looney left that believe Rove has any signicant effect on policy.
Washington Post: Rove Is Promoted To Deputy Staff Chief

"Rove, the political mastermind behind two presidential elections, yesterday was named White House deputy chief of staff in charge of coordinating domestic policy, economic policy, national security and homeland security."

 
72 posted on 07/26/2007 1:57:32 PM PDT by counterpunch ("The Democrats are the party of slavery." - Cindy Sheehan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

He is a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution and founded the official journal of the Federalist Society. Yea, he’s a jihadist alright.


73 posted on 07/26/2007 1:57:42 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan

All I can find is this one opinion piece by Mark Krikorian, with no sourcing, making this claim about the “Defender of the Melting Pot Award”. It has then been picked up by everyone else. I’m always dubious of folks who don’t provide citations.

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmI3NzU5OTc4ZjdiZDgxNDdjNTkzZmM0MjExZmE2NGE=


74 posted on 07/26/2007 1:57:48 PM PDT by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Are you being obtuse or what? He was “promoted” to that position. When Thompson promotes Abraham to Deputy Staff Chief you can bitch.


75 posted on 07/26/2007 2:00:12 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Rudy Derangement, followed by Fred Derangement; peppered with a “any republican that has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning” derangement. I really wonder about some people.


76 posted on 07/26/2007 2:00:53 PM PDT by I_like_good_things_too (Don't make perfect the enemy of the good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And I didn't bother to dig deeper. Seeing that one snippet from Krikorian's article was...unnerving.

The requirement for my passionate support for any candidate is that he or she is a genuine and electable conservative, preferably without RINO tendencies.

77 posted on 07/26/2007 2:01:01 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
I am currently arguing with NumbersUSA about their report card on Fred, but the ending of the most recent email is quite interesting:

Looking at the links you sent me, I can see how you reached your conclusion. If it is any consolation, of the potential GOP front runners, Thompson remains has one of the better records on immigration- although his recent hiring of Spencer Abraham is cause for concern.

All the best,

Jeremy

You need to post a thread on this, and ping all the gnats to it.

78 posted on 07/26/2007 2:01:03 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: keepitreal
What's also odd in that story is how they describe Abraham:
architect of congressional libertarians' anti-immigrant policy of mass immigration.. so did Abraham author an anti-immigrant policy or a mass immigration policy or a policy that is anti immigrant by doing something with mass immigration????
79 posted on 07/26/2007 2:01:03 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

“Abraham was one of only two U.S. Senators who refused to sign an October 2000 letter to President Clinton condemning terrorist acts by Yasser Arafat and the P.L.O.”


80 posted on 07/26/2007 2:01:46 PM PDT by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson