Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Speaks at Aaron Russo Memorial Service
Ron Paul 2008 ^ | September 09, 2007 | Kent Synder

Posted on 09/09/2007 9:19:10 PM PDT by NapkinUser

Edited on 09/09/2007 9:56:45 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Congressman Ron Paul spoke at the memorial service for Aaron Russo Friday morning in West Hollywood, California.

Mr. Russo had a long and accomplished career in the entertainment industry and was a leading advocate in the freedom movement. He was one of the first public figures to endorse Dr. Paul for president in January of this year.

Excerpt

----------------------

Russo also sounded off on 9/11, openly airing his view for the first time that it was a complete inside job.

"People know that 9/11 was an inside job," said Russo, "look what they did here in America, look at 9/11, look what they did - they killed thousands of Americans - people jumping out of windows from a hundred floors up - they don't care," said the director.

"There's no way that Building 7 came down without a controlled demolition, it takes weeks to do the controlled demolition, they couldn't have done it in a few hours like Larry Silverstein said - it blows the whole game - concrete doesn't turn to powder unless its exploded."

"We all know that 9/11 was a fraud - an inside job," concluded Russo.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911; 911truthers; aaronrusso; alexjimjones; alfredeneuman; asseenonstormfront; binladensboy; birchers; coasttocoast; cuespookymusic; daviddukespresident; electrictheater; foolsgoldwater; gayvoters; gopalbatross; heeeeeeeeeeeykoolaid; itsdajoooos; johnbirchsociety; logcabinrepublicans; marines; mentallyretarded; moonbats; mrspaulsshrimp; nutjobs; ourkucinich; pagingartbell; paul; paulahmadinejhad2008; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulsheehan2008; peacecreeps; potheadsforpaul; ronaldapplewhite; ronnutters; ronpaul; rontards; rossperotthesequel; rupaul; scampi; shrimpfest2007; stormfrontpaul; tinfoilhats; truther; truthers; wildamericanshrimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: NapkinUser
If you do not believe Paul and you Paulnuts are pissing off the republican base that Paul needs to get reelected in the GOP, you are really as stupid as your posts portray you. Paul can not win reelection as a GOP congressman without republican support. His republican support is nonexistent now and he will not recover it. Take that to the bank.
41 posted on 09/10/2007 12:37:59 PM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
Take that to the bank.

Okay, I will. Incumbents are close to impossible to defeat in primaries, and Paul is no exception. Hagel would have won his primary too unfortunately. I'll remember this thread and get back to you when Paul wins.

The only way Paul doesn't win reelection to his U.S. House seat is if he retires. Take that to the bank.

42 posted on 09/10/2007 12:42:01 PM PDT by NapkinUser (Tom Tancredo or Ron Paul in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Hagel is retiring because Bunning has taken all his republican support from him and was going to defeat him for the GOP nomination. Hagel is retiring, so he is not defeated. Hagel owns words have caused him to retire. The same thing will happen to Paul. Republicans hate this guy now and deservedly so. You Libertarians can not save his arse when he runs for reelection. I have a large family presence in south Houston that in Paul’s district that has voted for him in the past that will not now. My brother travels in republican circles there and there is no support for him in the GOP. Libertarians yes, but his largest voting bloc he needs, he has alienated and pissed off and he will not get that back.
43 posted on 09/10/2007 12:50:22 PM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Thanks for post #28.


44 posted on 09/10/2007 3:00:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Boycott FReeper Petronski's Wyler's! Insist on Kool-Aid! The best refreshment for Paulistinians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
******If you do not believe Paul and you Paulnuts are pissing off the republican base that Paul needs to get reelected in the GOP, you are really as stupid as your posts portray you. Paul can not win reelection as a GOP congressman without republican support. His republican support is nonexistent now and he will not recover it. Take that to the bank.*******

It wasn’t that long ago that the Democratic Party was considered the War Party. Wilson got us into WW I, FDR got us into WW II, Truman got us a no win situation in Korea, Kennedy/Johnson got us into Nam.

Actually I don’t think RP cares about whether or not he wins the next election, he is more concerned about doing the right thing.

Even if you Ron Paul h*ters don’t like some of his positions, you should admire him for his consistent, principled stands on the issues. You should also admire him as the most honest politician, or at least in the top 5 of the most honest politicians in recent history.

It will be interesting tonight to see what time slot O’Reilly gives Ron Paul on his show. The later the slot, the more he thinks RP will bring an audience.

45 posted on 09/10/2007 4:54:11 PM PDT by jmeagan (Our last chance to change the direction of the country--Ron Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: End Times Crusader
Ya’ll got some explaining to do.
I don't have any explaining to do. The man spoke at another's funeral and you read something nefarious into it? It's called being courteous for supporting him in his political career.
And people tell me to get a life?! What a laugh!
Why don't you gig Russo for what he got right while you're at it.
46 posted on 09/12/2007 6:07:20 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Just stating the facts. I guess some around here may think this is a bad thing or not recognize any of the things that they supported in the past.

I do not really post here anymore as it is my mothers account and I feel that if I even respectfully gave my point of view or attempted to debate my mother would get a warning.

If I opened up an account I would not last long. Years ago I use to post here all the time. It was different back then.

Ms. Casey’s Daughter


47 posted on 09/14/2007 12:43:14 PM PDT by MSCASEY (Our God is an Awesome God! Please come soon Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson