Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Free Republic Do If Fred Thompson Is Not The Republican Nominee? (Vanity)
December 9 2007 | jveritas

Posted on 12/09/2007 5:12:49 PM PST by jveritas

It is very obvious that Fred Thompson is Free Republic most favorite candidate and by far. On the other hand every other top tier Republican candidate, Guiliani, Romney, Huckabee, and McCain are absolutely disdained by most Freepers. Therefore this is the important question:

What would Free Republic do if Fred Thompson is not the Republican Party Nominee?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; guiliani; huckabee; mccain; romney; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-427 next last
To: GregoTX

If the current status of the republican party reflects your idea of conservatism, then it’s over. It’s lost. We are screwed already.


221 posted on 12/09/2007 7:01:45 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
"Read that as Pro Life, Pro Second Amendment, Pro National Defense and Anti Illegal Invasion. "

You match 100% of my criteria. Every pro-gun person I know matches the other three criteria, as well.

222 posted on 12/09/2007 7:03:35 PM PST by matthew fuller (Yo, First Dude- Got your "legacy"- Bush's Border Baby Boomers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: All

Drives me nuts whenever I hear “if you vote Third Party, its a vote for Hillary”.

A real wasted vote is a conservative voting for a liberal just because he has an (R) next to his/her name

If conservatives have to go 3d Party to find a suitable candidate, then that is the fault of the GOP going liberal.

As for the GOP....I rank the candidates on the “vote” factor....the higher ranked means I will vote (or hold my nose) for them...anything 6 or lower is 3d Party time

1. Tancredo
2. Hunter
3. Thompson
4. Romney (holding my nose by now)
5. Paul (really holding nose...brain-hurting by this time)
6. McCain (hellooo 3d Party)
7. Rudy (actually moves up in my poll...scary)
8. Hucksterbee (really bad being behind Guleeani...scarier)


223 posted on 12/09/2007 7:05:07 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Mike Huckabee values illegals, criminals, and terrorists...Thanks "Values Voters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: GregoTX
"I do not think your plan will work."

Oh yea, because that old 'vote for whatever republican because they are the lesser of two evils' plan for getting the republican party back to conservative roots is working out so well for us, isn't it? At some point in time you have to realize that voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.

The leadership of the republican party has absolutely zero incentive to listen to the conservative base because they have become so accustomed to us going along no matter what. Please let me know how this is advancing conservatism.

224 posted on 12/09/2007 7:05:13 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: ExGeeEye

Exercise in futility. FRED THOMPSON will be our candidate and I am positive it will happen! This is a hypothetical that I will not answer until I am forced to.

FRED THOMPSON (true Conservative Federalist) - NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERIENCE (I’ll do whatever it takes to stop the bastards, include waterboarding) - 2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE (arm everyone and the criminals will back off) - SECURE THE BORDERS (starve the bastards out and they will go home) - LAW AND ORDER (enforcement first and foremost) - SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM (the program can’t sustain itself) - DEFEAT THE DEMOCRAT (any fool they put up) – TAX SIMPLIFICATION (choice for the tax payer) - PING!


225 posted on 12/09/2007 7:06:32 PM PST by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN GRANDMA FREEPER FredHEAD! The Hunt for a FRED November is on! Don't be fooled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Reagan79
Republicans won’t carry NM either.

Or Illinois were I'm registered so my vote in the General Elections won't mean squat anyways.

226 posted on 12/09/2007 7:08:11 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
Two reasons I wouldn't vote for Giuliani -- he is far too liberal on social issues and he has the character of Bill Clinton. As a result, I don't trust him to nominate judges to the judiciary. Nor do I trust him to do anything but what is best for himself.

Huckabee has a lot of liberal tenancies but he would be strong on social issues and I trust him to nominate judges to the judiciary and keep his campaign promises.

I wish the choices were better. But, unless Fred pulls it out, it doesn't look like there will be.

227 posted on 12/09/2007 7:13:17 PM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Am I in California? --> Yes. --> Is there ANY CHANCE WHATSOEVER that the Republican will carry California? --> No. --> Will my vote for the RINO change the results. --> No. Will a third party vote have even the slighest chance of influencing future debate? --> mmmmayyyybe...

Hmmm...I wonder how many in CA think like that ? maybe you should all make a stand and vote for the Republican candidate. Could have surprising results.

228 posted on 12/09/2007 7:13:32 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot
There is no doubt about Huckabee's record during a decade in Little Rock as governor. He was regarded by fellow Republican governors as a compulsive tax increaser and spender. He increased the Arkansas tax burden by 47 percent, boosting the levies on gasoline and cigarettes. When he decided to lose 100 pounds and pressed his new lifestyle on the American people, he was far from a Goldwater-Reagan libertarian.

As a presidential candidate, Huckabee has sought to counteract his reputation as a taxer by pressing for replacement of the income tax with a sales tax and has more recently signed the no-tax-increase pledge of Americans for Tax Reform. But Huckabee simply does not fit in normal boundaries of economic conservatism, as when he criticized President Bush's veto of a Democratic expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). Calling global warming a "moral issue" mandating "a biblical duty" to prevent climate change, he has endorsed the cap-and-trade system that is anathema to the free market.

Huckabee clearly departs from the mainstream of the conservative movement in his confusion of "growth" with "greed." Such ad hominem attacks are part of his intuitive response to criticism from the Club for Growth and the libertarian Cato Institute for his record as governor. On Fox News Sunday Nov. 18, he called the "tactics" of the Club for Growth "some of the most despicable in politics today. It's why I love to call them the Club for Greed because they won't tell you who gave their money." In fact, all contributors to the organization's political action committee (which produces campaign ads) are publicly revealed, as are most donors financing issue ads.

Quin Hillyer, a former Arkansas journalist writing in the conservative American Spectator, called Huckabee "a guy with a thin skin, a nasty vindictive streak." Huckabee's retort was to attack Hillyer's journalistic procedures, fitting a mean-spirited image when he responds to conservative criticism. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/11/huckabee_the_false_conservativ.html

Governor Huckabee touts himself as an economic conservative, writing in his biography that he "pushed through the Arkansas legislature the first major, broad-based tax cuts in state history" and "led efforts to establish a Property Taxpayers' Bill of Rights" early on as governor (Arkansas Times 09/22/05), but he only offers a small piece of the picture. It is true that Governor Huckabee fought for an $80 million tax cut package in 1997 that was passed by the Arkansas legislature (Cato Policy Analysis No. 315, 09/03/98); cut the state capital gains tax in 1999 (The Commercial Appeal 02/29/99); and passed the Property Taxpayers' Bill of Rights in the same year, limiting the increase in property taxes to 10% a year for individuals and 5% per taxing unit (AP 03/16/99). However, his record over the rest of his ten-year tenure tells a starkly different story.

Immediately upon taking office, Governor Huckabee signed a sales tax hike in 1996 to fund the Games and Fishing Commission and the Department of Parks and Tourism (Cato Policy Analysis No. 315, 09/03/98). He supported an internet sales tax in 2001 (Americans for Tax Reform 01/07/07). He publicly opposed the repeal of a sales tax on groceries and medicine in 2002 (Arkansas News Bureau 08/30/02).

He signed bills raising taxes on gasoline (1999), cigarettes (2003) (Americans for Tax Reform 01/07/07), and a $5.25 per day bed-tax on private nursing home patients in 2001 (Arkansas New Bureau 03/01/01).

He proposed another sales take hike in 2002 to fund education improvements (Arkansas News Bureau 12/05/02). He opposed a congressional measure to ban internet taxes in 2003 (Arkansas News Bureau 11/21/03). In 2004, he allowed a 17% sales tax increase to become law (The Gurdon Times 03/02/04).

By the end of his ten-year tenure, Governor Huckabee was responsible for a 37% higher sales tax in Arkansas, 16% higher motor fuel taxes, and 103% higher cigarette taxes according to Americans for Tax Reform (01/07/07), garnering a lifetime grade of D from the free-market Cato Institute. While he is on record supporting making the Bush tax cuts permanent, he joined Democrats in criticizing the Republican Party for tilting its tax policies "toward the people at the top end of the economic scale" (Washington Examiner 09/13/06), even though objective evidence demonstrates that the Bush tax cuts have actually shifted the tax burden to higher income taxpayers.

Finally, Governor Huckabee opposed further tax cuts at a 2005 gathering of Iowa conservatives (AP 09/17/05). On January 28, 2007, Governor Huckabee refused to pledge not to raise taxes if elected President, first on Meet the Press and then at the National Review Conservative Summit. The evidence suggests that his commitment to protecting taxpayers evidenced in his early gubernatorial years may be a thing of the past.

Under Governor Huckabee's watch, state spending increased a whopping 65.3% from 1996 to 2004, three times the rate of inflation (Americans for Tax Reform 01/07/07). The number of state government workers rose 20% during his tenure (Arkansas Leader 04/15/06), and the state's general obligation debt shot up by almost $1 billion, according to Americans for Tax Reform. The massive increase in government spending is due in part to the number of new programs and expansion of already existing programs initiated by Governor Huckabee, including ARKids First, a multimillion-dollar government program to provide health coverage for thousands of Arkansas' children (Arkansas News Bureau 04/13/06).

Governor Huckabee has consistently supported and initiated measures that increase government's interference in markets, thereby impeding economic growth. He told the Washington Times he supports "empowering people to make their own decisions," but many of his key proposals have done just the opposite (Washington Times 03/01/05). These measures include:

Raised the minimum wage in April 2006 from $5.15 to $6.25 an hour and encouraged Congress to take the same initiative on a national level (US Newswire 08/03/06), a proposal that President Bush and most congressional GOP members oppose.

Sought to take revenue from his tax hike proposal to be used on economic development projects in 2002 (AP, 11/22/02). Threatened to investigate price-gouging after 9/11 if gasoline prices went up too high (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 09/12/01). Ordered regulatory agencies in Arkansas to investigate price-gouging in the nursing home industry (AP, 06/15/01).

Signed a bill into law that would prevent companies from raising their prices a mere 10% ahead of a natural disaster. Services like roof repair and tree removal were targeted (Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 03/07/97).

http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2007/01/a_report_on_mike_huckabees_fis.php

On crime:

If you're wondering how Gov. Huckabee's hundreds of clemencies compare with neighboring states, get ready for a shocker.

___ Huckabee leads the pack.

___ He has issued more commutations and pardons than all of the six neighboring states combined.

From 1996 through July 2004, Arkansas had more clemencies than all neighboring states combined. One-third of Texas clemencies were for people convicted with planted evidence.

___Governors seldom reduce sentences in other states – and almost never for murderers serving life without parole or for rapists or for habitual drunk drivers, while in Arkansas it's a regular habit with Huckabee.

___ Other governors use their clemency power only rarely, while Huckabee has made it routine. As we've told you before, he has issued more than 700 pardons and commutations during his eight years in office – more than 137 this year alone – and more than his three predecessors combined.

___ Here are the figures for neighboring states since 1996, when Huckabee took office (and keep in mind the population of these states is nearly 20 times ours):

___ >> Louisiana – 213.

___ >> Mississippi – 24.

___ >> Missouri – 79.

___ >> Oklahoma – 178.

___ >> Tennessee – 32.

___ >> Texas – 98 (in-cludes 36 inmates released because they were convicted on drug charges with planted evidence).

___ Total: 624 vs. Huckabee's 703.

On abortion:

In February 1995, Huckabee supported revising the GOP abortion plank to let states decide their own abortion laws.

"The issue divides strongly committed pro-life and pro-choice Republicans but is not a central issue to most other Republicans. A possible platform revision long under discussion would say the Republican Party, 'unlike the Democratic Party, does not stand for abortion on demand and is basically a pro-life party.' In the spirit of federalism, the proposed GOP revision also would replace the abortion amendment with a statement saying the issue should be left up to the individual state legislatures to deal with as each sees fit. 'That's exactly what we have looked for, and if it's left up to the states, more of them are going to put some restrictions on abortion,' Arkansas Lt. Gov. Mike Huckabee said in an interview after appearing on a conference panel yesterday."

(Ralph Z. Hallow, "Conservatives Hold Fire On Abortion," Washington Times, 2/12/95)

And in an April 2006 interview with the blog "Right Wing News" Huckabee indicated that abortion decisions should be left to the States.

John Hawkins [Right Wing News]: Switching gears again, do you think we should overturn Roe v. Wade?

Mike Huckabee: It would please me because I think Roe v. Wade is based on a real stretch of Constitutional application -- that somehow there is a greater privacy issue in the abortion concern -- than there is a human life issue -- and that the federal government should be making that decision as opposed to states making that decision. So, I've never felt that it was a legitimate manner in which to address this and, first of all, it should be left to the states, the 10th Amendment, but secondly, to somehow believe that the taking of an innocent, unborn human life is about privacy and not about that unborn life is ludicrous.

(www.rightwingnews.com/interviews/huckabee.php)

Now Huckabee gives the completely opposite position while chastising Thompson for having the same position on abortion that Huckabee had just last year:

Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee rejects letting states decide whether to allow abortions, claiming the right to life is a moral issue not subject to multiple interpretations. "It's the logic of the Civil War," Huckabee said Sunday, comparing abortion rights to slavery. "If morality is the point here, and if it's right or wrong, not just a political question, then you can't have 50 different versions of what's right and what's wrong." "For those of us for whom this is a moral question, you can't simply have 50 different versions of what's right," he said in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071118/ap_on_el_pr/huckabee

On immigration:

Now:

The former Arkansas governor received numerous standing ovations during an address to 2,000 social conservatives at the recent Values Voters Summit in Washington, DC. Huckabee accused the government of making it more difficult for the average American to get on an airplane in their own hometown than for an illegal alien to get across an international border.

"We need to make it clear," Huckabee told the gathering, "that we will say no to amnesty, no to sanctuary cities, and no to the idea that there can be some complete ignoring of the fact that our laws have been broken."

Continuing, the GOP presidential hopeful said he does not blame those who want to come to America. "I blame our government for sitting on its hands for over 20 years and letting this problem get completely out of hand. Build a border fence, secure the border -- and do it now," Huckabee implored.

Roy Beck, president of Numbers USA, says Huckabee's past record on immigration has not matched his recent rhetoric, citing several instances when the former governor "stood up for illegal aliens" during federal immigration raids in Arkansas. "It does not seem to me that, as governor, he particularly lived by those principles, at least strongly so. I am always happy to see someone learn more about an issue and come around and take better positions," he states. "We welcome what seems to be some change of heart."

Beck says Huckabee received an "F" for his past record on immigration, but his recent statements have pulled him up to the "B" range.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/10/immigration_activist_welcomes.php

---

And what has Huckabee said on immigration in the past?

"I would hope that no matter who we are, or where we are from, that America should always be a place that opens its arms, opens it heart, opens its spirit to people who come because they want the best for their families."

-Mike Huckabee [spoken along with Tyson Foods Inc. Chairman and CEO John Tyson, at a noon luncheon of the League of United Latin American Citizens]

Gov. Mike Huckabee on Thursday heaped criticism upon immigration legislation in the Arkansas Legislature, describing it as inflammatory . . . race-baiting and demagoguery. He also challenged the Christian values of its main sponsor.

Huckabee said the bill, seeking to forbid public assistance and voting rights to undocumented immigrants, inflames those who are racist and bigots and makes them think there's a real problem. But theres not.

The bill is modeled after Proposition 200, approved by Arizona voters in November. The Arkansas measure was filed by Republican Sens. Jim Holt of Springdale and Denny Altes of Fort Smith.

Huckabee, also a Republican and a Baptist minister, said Arkansans should be welcoming hard-working immigrants of all races. He singled out Holt, who often talks of his strong Christian beliefs, saying, “I drink a different kind of Jesus juice. My faith says don't make false accusations against somebody. In the Bible, it's called don't bear false witness.”

In response, Holt said he was hurt by the governor's questioning his faith. “I just want to uphold the law and protect the benefits that apply to citizens, “ Holt said.

-Arizona Republic: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0128prop200-arkansas.html

Gov. Mike Huckabee Thursday denounced a bill by Sen. Jim Holt that would deny state benefits to illegal immigrants as “un-Christian, un-American, irresponsible and anti-life.” Holt, R-Springdale, replied later that Christian charity does not include turning a blind eye to lawbreaking.

Senate Bill 206, filed Wednesday, also would require proof of citizenship to register to vote and would require state agencies to report suspected cases of people living in the country illegally.

Holt replied, “I think the politically correct movement has misconstrued what compassion really means. They think compassion means that any person can disrespect our laws and that we're supposed to be tolerant and let them get away with it.”

”True compassion is correcting them so in the future they can be law-abiding citizens,” Holt said. “They broke the law,he said. My angst is not with them, though. My angst is with the state and federal government for not enforcing our laws.”

”People living illegally in the United State has overwhelmed our school and welfare system,” McCutchen said. As for whether the bill reflects un-Christian attitudes, McCutchen said: “Jim Holt is as good a man and as good a Christian as any man walking this Earth.”

”Doggone it, the rule of law is not being upheld, and that's wrong,” McCutchen said.

-Arkansas News: http://www.arkansasnews.com/archive/2005/01/28/News/316347.html

”I didn't sign the No Amnesty pledge because it was a silly piece of campaign propaganda cooked up by Tancredo. Candidates don't make pledges for each other to sign, and he knows that.”

-Mike Huckabee August 4, 2007 http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=196021

He [Mike Huckabee] also made the insane point that companies like Toyota would not invest in Arkansas if the state didn't allow non-citizens to vote because it would send the message that, essentially, 'If you don’t look like us, talk like us and speak like us, we don't want you.

-Ann Coulter [http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AnnCoulter/2007/10/10/fred_sawyer_and_huckabee_finn]

”I do believe that some of [the opposition to the McCain-Kennedy-Bush Amnesty Bill] is driven by racism or nativism. It's not amnesty to make people pay for breaking the law.”

-Wash. Times May, 2006

229 posted on 12/09/2007 7:14:17 PM PST by Free Vulcan (This Iowan ain't dancin' the Hucky Pokey January 3rd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Vote for the nominee who will be better than Clinton of course.

But first things first. The primaries aren’t over. No sense ticking everybody off just yet. We’ll see what happens.


230 posted on 12/09/2007 7:14:44 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Jim Robinson

Yes, but we didn’t lose them because they supported Giuliani. We still have Giuliani supporters on this board.

Initially, a few were banned because of the tactics they were using to support their candidate. Others were banned because they didn’t understand why Jim banned/suspended some people or because they just didn’t like that he did and they jumped into it like drama queens in a confrontational manner. Most of the people that were “purged” were only temporarily suspended and not banned.

Jim Robinson gave people plenty of warning. He asked them to quit smearing other candidates in their attempt to make Giuliani look better. There is a degree of smear tactics that goes on here all the time, but when it gets out of hand and totally disrupts the forum (as some Giuliani supporters were doing), Jim puts his foot down. You can see he did that recently with Hunter supporter, pissant.


231 posted on 12/09/2007 7:15:28 PM PST by Elyse (I refuse to feed the crocodile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: All
I have a question for those who say they'll hold their noses and vote for Rudy if he's the nominee.

That question is two fold, will you contribute time and or money to help get him elected or will you be like me and sit on my butt and my wallet?

232 posted on 12/09/2007 7:16:33 PM PST by Doofer (Fred Dalton Thompson For President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: topfile

“I don’t get the Goryism thing, what do you mean specifically? “

Huckabee is a believer in Al Gore’s global warming hoax. He has said: ““If we do not take some serious and urgent steps to stop the poison – both the poison that Islamic extremists are spewing with our oil money – but also the poison that we’re spewing into the atmosphere —then we’re not really serious about national security.”” I don’t doubt that Huckabee is sincere, but there’s no prize for being gullible.

Fred Thompson, on the other hand, said the following:

http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NTQzYWY1MGM5NTkyZTM2YWVlMDMzMDlhMzQwNThhNDU=

Soft-on-crime Huckabee pardoned more criminals than the six neighboring states combined:

http://www.arkansasleader.com/frontstories/st_08_11_04/huckabee8.html


233 posted on 12/09/2007 7:18:46 PM PST by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

That’s easy. It’s called the electoral college.


234 posted on 12/09/2007 7:19:33 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

I’ll support the Republican candidate. Anyone but Hillary and anyone over a liberal Democrat.


235 posted on 12/09/2007 7:19:39 PM PST by amutr22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

GOOD QUESTION! I’m 1000% for Fred but in a pinch would vote whoever is the Republican...sigh...but only Fred counts for me since Hunter hasn’t got a prayer. Actually, even if Hunter did have a prayer I’d choose Fred first.


236 posted on 12/09/2007 7:20:37 PM PST by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

Heck no. If the next prez is un conservative, we are going to need this site even more to maintain sanity.


237 posted on 12/09/2007 7:21:48 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I would assume that most here would support the candidate chosen by the voters in accordance with law and custom. The alternative is unacceptable. I.e., a demoncrat in the WH.


238 posted on 12/09/2007 7:21:57 PM PST by Thumper1960 (Unleash the Dogs of War as a Minority, or perish as a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I think Utah’s electoral delegates will vote for Romney no matter what. Even if he isn’t on the ballot in ‘08. I really do.

I wonder what effect that would have on the election.


239 posted on 12/09/2007 7:23:16 PM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

‘If it takes the complete destruction of the republican party .....’

question is.....are we willing to see the COMPLETE destruction of America by allowing Hillary or, worse, Obama to win in ‘08?

We’re on the road to destruction now....with a Dem in the White House and Dem controlled House and Senate we may well completely self destruct......


240 posted on 12/09/2007 7:25:18 PM PST by 4integrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-427 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson