Posted on 03/12/2008 5:37:43 PM PDT by blam
Dino-Era Feathers Found Encased in Amber
James Owen
for National Geographic News
March 11, 2008
Seven dino-era feathers found perfectly preserved in amber in western France highlight a crucial stage in feather evolution, scientists report.
The hundred-million-year-old plumage has features of both feather-like fibers found with some two-legged dinosaurs known as theropods and of modern bird feathers, the researchers said.
This means the fossils could fill a key gap in the puzzle of how dinosaurs gave rise to birds, according to a team led by Vincent Perrichot of the Museum für Naturkunde-Berlin in Germany.
The find provides a clear example "of the passage between primitive filamentous down and a modern feather," said team member Didier Néraudeau of the University of Rennes in France.
The study team isn't sure yet whether the feathers belonged to a dino or a bird.
But fossil teeth from two dino families thought to have been feathered were excavated from rocks just above the layer that contained the amber, Perrichot said.
"It is entirely plausible that the feathers come from a dinosaur rather than from a bird," he said.
Perrichot and colleagues described their research last month in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Downy Plumes
Paleontologists at the University of Rennes found the tiny feathers encased in a lump of amber, a fossilized tree resin, in a quarry in the Poitou-Charentes region of France in 2000.
The feathers' central shafts, or rachis, are primitive and most closely resemble down feathers, the study team noted.
The feather filaments, or barbs, had yet to become fully fused at the base and—similar to modern down—they lacked hooklets known as barbules to hold the filaments together.
Today's birds could not fly with such feathers, the team said.
Studies suggest primitive feathers first evolved in flightless dinosaurs that generated heat internally and so would have benefited from the insulation that down can provide.
Feathers later evolved for use in flight, the theory holds, although experts debate whether birds' immediate ancestors were tree-dwelling, gliding dinosaurs or terrestrial dinos that ran at high speeds and eventually lifted off the ground.
Either way, the amber-encased feathers show for the first time the transition from downy filaments toward an aerodynamic, planar shape that enabled flight, Perrichot said.
"This most critical step in the evolution of feathers" was suggested by evolutionary theories but had never previously been seen in either modern or fossil feathers, he said.
Team member Néraudeau added that this missing link has been "an argument for creationists and others to reject the theropod-birds lineage and to argue in favor of different origins for theropod feathers and bird feathers."
"First Good Look"
Nick Longrich, of the University of Calgary in Canada, said "this could be our first good look at a dinosaur body feather."
The bird-fossil expert, who was not involved in the study, noted that the newfound feathers are around 50 million years younger than the first known flying bird, Archaeopteryx, which lived about 150 million years ago.
(See a picture of an Archaeopteryx fossil that shows the imprints of feathers.)
"Obviously this animal [the feathers came from] isn't directly ancestral to anything except later dinosaurs, but it's quite likely that we are seeing aspects of the ancestral [feather structure]," Longrich said in an email.
"So the animal isn't transitional' but it may preserve a transitional structure."
It's also possible that the simplified structure of the feathers isn't so primitive, he added.
Modern flightless birds such as ostriches and emus have highly simplified feathers, he said.
More samples from the fossil record are needed to settle the issue, so "hopefully this study will cause more people to look for dinosaur feathers in amber," Longrich added.
Very cool! Thanks for posting...
Indeed, very cool!
YEC INTREP
So, in truth, they are just feathers and they have no idea what they were on. It proves nothing except that a feathered creature fot a little to close to the sticky amber.
Sounds like a reasonable summary of what happened.
All the rest is *could have, maybe, plausible, suggest*.....
You and I posted at the same time. Your topic was this and my topic was Eliot Spitzer’s prostitute.
Your post was more important to world history. I have always been fascinated by paleontology.
My post got 1000 hits right away. :-)
Just remember, every time you fill a gap, there are two new gaps on either side. The gaps are winning.
LOL - exactly what I was thinking.....this is hilarious! 100 million years old...right. And could be “dino feathers”....or....it....could....be.....BIRD....feathers!!!!
Duh. Bingo.
They are SOOOO desperate to find the “gap” half dinosaur, half bird creatures that do not exist.....they make fools of themselves.
And we who believe in Creation / Intelligent Design / are said to have the “faith” based view of how animals/plants/people came into being on this earth....
It takes a flying leap of faith to see anything but BIRD FEATHERS here.....
“All the rest is *could have, maybe, plausible, suggest*....”
Yes, but you don’t understand that that’s how we do science in the modern age.
We don’t need no steenkin’ testable results or anything that’s falsifiable. All we need is a bunch of guys (or gals) sitting in a room talking about what would be the most likely outcome to satisfy our predetermined conclusions and voila! it becomes unarguable fact.
Got it?
Unless you have the secret Captain Ancient Decoder Ring that comes in specially marked boxes of Evoats...
On further reflection...better nix that proposal.
Just stay away from frogs.
I’m learning....
Good one blam. I have long had an interest in this subject.
Fascinating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.