Supreme Court rejects Obama case

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf ^

[cycle of discernment]

too bad

[Mojave]

The father is listed at Frank Marshall Davis.

I've heard that. That would be interesting and it would expose Obama as blatant liar.

[TCH]

Thanks. The wife is afraid I will get myself in trouble. I reply: Let us hope so!

[MHGinTN]

In Kenya, those still alive at his birth to witness it.

[Alex Murphy]

Soon our sovereignty will mean less than the paper on which Obama's live birth was recorded.

[jetson]

Well thats it folks. The Supreme court just gave us the green light to make up or follow any laws that we citizens want to follow. I think I will start with moving into one of those cushy white house offices. It’s my own law that allows me to get one of those offices. I think I’ll take Nancy Pelosis office.

[MHGinTN]

Hey bubba, he is hiding soemthing. But that is a nice try to paint us all as kooks. Does Axelrod pay for this attentive insulting?

[autumnraine]

That’s an expensive agenda.

[Kevmo]

I do think that many here are deeply disappointed in the Obama election and are grasping at straws in the hopes of undoing the election.
***We’ve been pushing on this issue since before the election. The 20th Amendment of the constitution covers the eventuality of an ineligible candidate under consideration by the Electoral College — that same constitution that spells out elections. If that is “undoing” the election, then what are constitutionalists supposed to do? What are YOU doing on a constitutionalist website?

[autumnraine]

And you say you verified that this was the same procedure in 1961? That they ONLY accepted notices from hospitals?

[freepersup]

bookmark/ping

[sharkhawk]

The father is listed at Frank Marshall Davis.

I've heard that. That would be interesting and it would expose Obama as blatant liar.

Why? I follow politics almost as closely as anyone here and I doubt that more than 1% of the population know who Davis is and why that would make a difference. My guess is if there is any "scandal" here, it is Mom is listed as single mom, and his last name is Dunham, or he's got Mohammed somewhere in his name.

[SatinDoll]

There are 19 lawsuits concerning Senator Obama’s eligibility to the be U.S. President. Six have made it to SCOTUS:

Phillip J. Berg PA
Leo C. Donofrio NJ - stay denied, writ still pending(?)
Chris Strunk NY
Cort Wrotnowski CT
Darrel Hunter TX
Lightfoot CA

This issue isn’t going to die anytime soon.

Donofrio has an explanation at his website stating that New Jersey state court-related issues involving his case perhaps made the Supremes decide the way they did; so he is going back to NJ courts. What the Supreme Court may be looking for is that “perfect” landmark case. Good Lord knows! They have a lot of cases to pick and choose from on this issue.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

[CharacterCounts]

I was surprised to discover that no state requires this sort of proof before the candidate is placed on the ballot. Indeed, Obama may have found a loophole. But, I don't think we can change our entire system of laws to try to get him out of office. The reasons for requiring standing are well proven and help avoid anarchy, which is a goal of the far Left.

A more productive route in my opinion, is to work to change the laws in the various states so that Mr. Obama will have to demonstrate eligibility before he can be placed on the 2012 ballot.

[autumnraine]

I’ve kind of wondered that myself.

I haven’t heard of any nurse coming out and discussing a black child born to a white woman in 1961, Even in liberal Hawaii.

[bvw]

Hannity does what he has to to sell ads. That’s his job. Even on FR there’s little market for in-depth discussion of ideas and ideals. Every talk-jockey has to have a streak of shock-jocky.

[andy58-in-nh]

Just the thought of having that guy as President is keeping me asleep, unfortunately. I know I'm not alone in that respect. But then I imagine what would almost certainly happen if, even with absolute certainty, we discovered at this late date that Obama is ineligible to be President.

It would be his fault, no doubt - after all, we have to assume he knew the truth and if he lied, well, the shame's on him. The problem is... how to put this gently... many members of the African-American community would not take it too well. I would even go so far as to suggest that they would not blame him, but.... someone else. Loudly. Violently. Destructively. We certainly have every legal and moral right to ignore that potential and press on, especially if the man lied to the nation, but let's not kid ourselves: the consequences could be catastrophic.

[BP2]

Heard on Crusaderradio at approx 3:15 EST:

Leo was interviewed as saying that he and Cort will be on the US Supreme Court’s steps tomorrow morning (Tues), but nothing is planned or organized — per his words. However, other unconfirmed reports are that Leo might hold a press conference.

Leo confirmed in the radio interview that his case was denied w/o opinion. There is NO confirmation from ANYONE of what the count was — Obot misinformation.

It’s was, AT FIRST, rumored that Leo would be on PlainsRadio tonight, but ED confirmed that Leo will NOT be on the radio tonight because he’s doing some additional work on Cort’s case. Instead, Steve Pidgeon, the lead attorney on the Washington state Supreme Court case will be on PlainsRadio tonight, 8-10 CST. Trying to get that to the SCOTUS this week, too.

Leo noted that it was unusual for Cort’s case to be put bumped ahead of schedule for Conference — it’s believed to accommodate review before the Dec. 15 Electoral College vote:

Leo’s case:
> Nov 19 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.
> Dec 5 2008 Date of Conference
-————16 Days-————

Cort’s case:
> Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
> Dec 12 2008 Date of Conference
-————5 Days-————

[Dr. Eckleburg]

LOL.

[MHGinTN]

Thanks RS, I had missed Cort’s case getting to conference through Scalia. I applaud Justice Thomas for bringing Leo’s argument to conference, and it may be that because of Leo’s raising such unanswered issues that Cort’s case was even accept to conference! By Leo’s own words, Cort’s brief is much beeter posed than his was.

[pa mom]

I personally did not, see my source in post 596. The woman who wrote the description in that blog is the one who found the announcements. NB: The blog is one supportive of the position that Obama is ineligible.

The poster in #597, (sibre fan?) did indeed confirm that that is the policy. Even today, one paper prints only from vital records bureau while the other accepts personal submissions, but only with birth certificate.