Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Specter's Defection Could Help Republicans Block a Nominee to Replace Souter
Fox News ^ | 2009-05-01

Posted on 05/01/2009 10:07:49 AM PDT by rabscuttle385

Sen. Arlen Specter's switch to the Democratic Party means Democrats may need another moderate Republican to help them move a Supreme Court nominee out of the Judiciary Committee.

At first glance, with Democrats a hair away from a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, one would expect President Obama to have no trouble hand-picking a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter.

But in an ironic twist, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter's switch to the Democratic Party this week could give Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee the upper hand in rejecting a nominee they find unacceptable.

That's because the Judiciary Committee, where Specter was the ranking minority member, requires the consent of at least one Republican to end debate and move a nominee to the full Senate for a vote.

"I think, in narrow terms, it could present a procedural problem at the committee level, unless the Democrats are going to change the rules of the committee midstream," William Jacobson, a professor of law at Cornell University, told FOXNews.com.

"Most people presume in a controversial nomination that Arlen Specter would have been the one most likely to vote with Democrats, since he prides himself on being independent of Republicans. But now that he moves over to the Democratic side, the president and Democrats lost their most likely minority vote."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; arlenspecter; bho2009; bho44; bhoscotus; lindseygraham; obama; pennsylvania; rinoextinction; rinopurge; scotus; senate; souter; specter; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: rabscuttle385
""I think, in narrow terms, it could present a procedural problem at the committee level, unless the Democrats are going to change the rules of the committee midstream," "

Oh! They'd never do that...

21 posted on 05/01/2009 10:46:42 AM PDT by elfman2 (TheRightReasons.net - Reasoning CONSERVATIVES without the kooks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Hadn't thought about this. I'd assume with his party switch that Specter has given up all his current committee assignments. The Rats will have to give him new assignments which means replacing another Rat with Specter on what ever committee(s) they choose while the Republicans get to replace Specter. He was the ranking member on Judiciary, but no more. To put him back on judiciary, they have to boot one of theirs already on it.
22 posted on 05/01/2009 10:46:58 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Boy that’s rich! Gotta love that.

So getting rid of these buffoons does pay off after all.


23 posted on 05/01/2009 10:48:54 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“..unless the Democrats are going to change the rules of the committee midstream,”
Sorry but they’ll change the rules and sphincter’s jump won’t mean anything.


24 posted on 05/01/2009 10:56:41 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If Oral Snatch is still there, the ‘rats won’t have to search to hard.


25 posted on 05/01/2009 10:59:58 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If Graham wants to be re-elected his next time out, he is going to have to watch his voting record and try to look more conservative. I don’t think he is going to be real interested in looking like a friend to the Rats.


26 posted on 05/01/2009 11:40:46 AM PDT by Maryhere (Maryhere ("HE comes to rule the earth"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maryhere

The GOP of the beltway have concluded voters are not necissary to the eleciton process.

They just need magic words and absentee ballot voter fraud, just like the democrats.


27 posted on 05/01/2009 11:43:41 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Since when did Obummer give a fig for the Constitution.


28 posted on 05/01/2009 11:49:35 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Sorry to say, when I saw some Republicans saying they’d never vote for McCain I figured you may as well elect Obama and you may as well watch the Supreme Court turn blue as Massachusetts.

Because that, I’m sure is, and WAS the plan of the Dems before they won the election.


29 posted on 05/01/2009 11:54:03 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Specter’s Defection Could Help Republicans Block a Nominee to Replace Souter”

HA! Don’t count on it.


30 posted on 05/01/2009 12:03:20 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (If a muslim contracts swine flu, does he still get his 72 virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

I just heard on the radio that Biden is
in charge of the “search” for a justice
to replace Souter.


31 posted on 05/01/2009 12:09:57 PM PDT by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic

Yeah Rush was talking about this in the last hour.


32 posted on 05/01/2009 12:11:41 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (If a muslim contracts swine flu, does he still get his 72 virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

It is amazing how Lindsey has such solid support within the SC GOP. They may not even know how liberal he can be.


33 posted on 05/01/2009 1:44:33 PM PDT by Theodore R. (GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Maryhere

He had no trouble in 2008; why would 2014 be an obstacle? By then SC and all the states will be overrun with liberals.


34 posted on 05/01/2009 1:46:52 PM PDT by Theodore R. (GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: M203M4
Lindsey Graham will gladly vote for a big-government SCJ nominee.

Orin Hatch gave us two of the worst ever when we had a majority under Clinton. These weasels are all incestious.

35 posted on 05/01/2009 1:48:59 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

The GOP ruling elite really doesn’t have much interest in the Supreme Court because the Supreme Court is focused on domestic social issues. Rarely does a case involving commercial issues go to the Supremes; these issues are usually handled in other courts. An exception is Kelo, where the Court predictably protected corporate and government interests at the expense of private property rights. As long as the cases don’t upset the balance of power or the relative competitive situation between corporations, they are content to simply pass the resulting costs on to the consumer.


36 posted on 05/01/2009 2:11:26 PM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Liberalism is a hate crime that can no longer be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; alarm rider; Alex1977; at bay; Babsig; BILL_C; bnelson44; Clintonfatigued; ...
Here he comes to save the day...



...for the DumoRATS.

  Lindsey Ping
  "Republican by day, Democrat by night."

  Add me to the list. / Remove me from the list.

37 posted on 05/01/2009 3:56:46 PM PDT by upchuck (I'm glad I'm old. Thus I can remember when America was a decent, moral, God fearing country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Snarlin’ looses his seat, does he not?

Who will be his replacement on the Judiciary Committee?


38 posted on 05/01/2009 4:05:21 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bossmechanic
I just heard on the radio that Biden is in charge of the “search” for a justice to replace Souter.

Ya mean we might get a Pakastani manager of a 7-11 somewhere in Delaware as the nominee?
39 posted on 05/01/2009 9:21:33 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Six months from now there will be 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

What about Thune of SD?


40 posted on 05/01/2009 9:23:10 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Six months from now there will be 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson