Posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:00 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
We really, really wanted to take a break from writing about Orly Taitz today. It appears she's trying to get our attention, though. And maybe the police's as well.
The screen-shot posted above is one left on a recent blog post of hers. The judge mentioned is Royce C. Lamberth, who is assigned to her Taitz v. Obama lawsuit in Washington D.C. Taitz didn't write the comment, but her blog is moderated: No comments can be made public unless Taitz okay's them.
It's not like Taitz allows every comment to be made public. There are plenty of Taitz-critical comments left that never see the light of day. So Taitz or someone who works for her made the decision to publish a reader's comment about threatening a judge's grandchildren with murder. This should play well in Taitz's run for office.
Elsewhere on OrlyTaitzEsq.com--which we recommend you don't visit unless you've got some heavy-duty malware blocking software--we have the Laguna Niguel dentist lashing out against local media. Specifically, the local media that you are reading right now:
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.ocweekly.com ...
But it does matter. We're chasing ghosts with the Kenyan birth nonsense and this crazy lady is leading the charge.
He's hiding something big. Something that would obliterate the narrative manufactured by Ayers in "Dreams". That something most is most likely the identity of his real father. Kenya is a diversion.
Maybe not a call for an assault, but clearly threatening nonetheless.
The first paragraph describes that pretty much the toughest folks in the world (patriots constitutionalists and marines) are subject to persuasion through enlightened self interest. So certainly a weenie judge is also subject to this type of persuasion.
The second paragraph outlines the type of persuasion the author thinks might kick in that sense of enlightened self interest for the judge in question(seeing pix of your kids juxtaposed with pix of the murdered and mutilated). The phrase ‘yeah, that should do it’ is exactly referring to the kicking in of enlightened self interest.
So, no direct call for violence. But well beyond stupid rude and vulgar. It crossed that line by including the judge’s kids.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1120
In a December 11, 1998 appearance on Conan O’Brien’s late-night NBC talk show, Baldwin was asked about Clinton’s battle to avoid impeachment. An enraged Baldwin said the following about that battle, and about the Republican congressman spearheading the impeachment effort, Henry Hyde:
“... The President is very popular and things are going pretty good and they are voting to impeach the President. They voted on one article of impeachment already. And I come back from Africa to stained dresses and cigars and this and impeachment. I am thinking to myself in other countries they are laughing at us twenty four hours a day and I’m thinking to myself if we were in other countries, we would all right now, all of us together, [starts to shout] all of us together would go down to Washington and we would stone Henry Hyde to death! We would stone him to death! [crowd cheers] Wait! Shut up! Shut up! No shut up! I’m not finished. We would stone Henry Hyde to death and we would go to their homes and we’d kill their wives and their children. We would kill their families. [stands up screaming] What is happening in this country? What is happening?...”
In February 2006, after Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot and wounded (with shotgun pellets) a companion during a quail-hunting trip in Texas, Baldwin said:
“Cheney is a terrorist. He terrorizes our enemies abroad and innocent citizens here at home indiscriminately. Who ever thought Harry Whittington [the companion Cheney shot] would be the answer to America’s prayers. Finally, someone who might get that lying, thieving Cheney into a courtroom to answer some direct questions.”
You didn’t tear apart anything. This is neither a vanity nor a troll posting. Providing further evidence of Orly’s reprehensible conduct is legitimate information.
“We’re chasing ghosts with the Kenyan birth nonsense”
Maybe you are. I’m just making a reasonable request.
Are ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, and N.Y. Times ‘birthers’ too?
McCain ‘birthers’: ABC, CBS, NBC, FactCheck, N.Y. Times
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=127362
Eligibility issue was huge in 2008 when Obama opponent was focus of attention
” ...and this crazy lady is leading the charge. ...”
That appears to be an after-birther fantasy.
“Kenya is a diversion.”
Could be. We need a leader we can trust, not an agitator who only knows how to divide people.
The only way you can discourage us is through character assassination on your own side. It will not unite us against the DNC, not when so many people are hot on this issue.
You are wasting everyone's time. Troll.
LOL!! right on!
What a ridiculous argument. If we had to personally verify the information in every article we posted then we’d never be allowed to post anything about Obama’s eligibility now would we?
Try again.
While she may have not written in, Orly is responsible for the content of her blog.
Odd, when I wrote that I wasn’t thinking of hom, I used the word because it was used in regard to Orly. So it would appear, that you are the one with homos on your mind. I’m sure you are very sympathetic towards homos, you can rest assured I’m not. Your pic says it all.
Troll.
She moderates her blog and the comment is still up.
No one thinks about Orly until YOU post a thread about her
Right. I'm obviously the only freeper to post articles about Orly. /sarc
Do you see her sitting in her office moderating her blog? Or is she out and about doing a host of other things? YOU cannot have an honest answer to that because NO one knows right now although YOU claim to know.
For some reason, you detest truth or anyone seeking it. Along w/your control issues - your NEED to tell Freepers who they should consider their friend or enemy!
It wasn’t a small thing to check because Orly’s site is infested. FR doesn’t allow links to it anyway so I wouldn’t refer freepers to her site for verification.
None of that changes the fact that your argument is preposterous.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Of course you weren't. That comment about Lincoln had no connotations to it at all. </sarcasm>
You guys are nothing if not predictable.
Your pic says it all.
Ah yes, that mythical picture you claim you have of me.
You display every characteristic defining of a troll.
You mean give Orly a chance to defend herself even though you have already tried and convicted her?
Funny thing about innocent before proven guilty that you deniers do not understand. You are perfectly happy to attack those who seek truth as you sit there with nothing but a post (or BC) on the internet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.