LTC Lakin's Appeal Denied

U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals ^ | 10/12/10 | Clerk of the Court

[BuckeyeTexan]

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.

[STARWISE]

You know the truth .. you know what you did and what you paid for and received. Period.

Don't let the 0-lover, ACORN, SEIU turkeys getcha down .. ;)

I wouldn't do any more 'splainin' .. you given all there is to give .. and above and beyond the call of duty or personal generosity, I might add.

Anyone who continues to doubt you after what you showed or still questions it is muckraking and agitating, pure and simple.

Remember, there are folks here who are PAID to do that, in and outside of this country.

Jobs at Media Matters

How to Support President Obama's Agenda

AND

WATCH THIS

So, we really don't know the true status/motives of posters .. other than those we've come to know and judge personally over time.

[STE=Q]

Obama could undoubtedly lose his citizenship by renouncing it after coming of age. He could not lose it prior to that time.

That is my understanding.

HOWEVER: There are other ways (certain actions) to lose citizenship other than "renouncing" -- correct?

I don't have a list of all the perticulars... but I think becoming a citizen of a foreign country and taking up arms against the United States, or plotting against same, would probably forfeit citizenship.

So it IS possible there ARE things Obama could have done -- other than "renouncing" -- to put his citizenship in jeopardy, yes?

STE=Q

[BuckeyeTexan]

No, it wasn’t a joke. I see an extremely happy little boy before he became a hate-filled man.

[Red Steel]

You pay up yet?

[Danae]

I posted what I got from HDOH.

That is about 1000% more than YOU have done. All you are doing is speculating. And you are starting from a fabricated ASSUMPTION. That assumption is: You believe that I am posting up forgeries.

PROVE IT.

You can't. Know why?

BECAUSE THEY ARE LEGIT.

But then maybe you have the formula for changing lead into gold. That would perhaps explain how YOU can turn legitimate documents into forgeries with out ever having set your eyes on the things.

"Perhaps, but then you could prove that your document is authentic by posting a photograph in which the issue date and raised seal are visible. The fact that you refuse to do so is quite telling."

Man you are either STUPID, or deliberately acting like a moron.

There IS NO raised seal on a photocopy of a Long Form Certificate. Why?? Because its NOT CERTIFIED you fool. I never said it was. In fact I have stated a couple times that it is not certified, and I have never even implied that it was. So want to explain how to get a seal on a document which is not supposed to HAVE a seal? Genius... come on.

I posted what I got from HDOH. You have posted NOTHING. You haven't even made a cogent argument.

The scans are redacted you don't need my personal information or my parents personal information. They are not photo shopped.

You can kiss my ass.

















And, now, ALL of the documents I have all together in one place:







Note the next two documents, the Black and White has MORE information on it than does the copy I received from my mom in 2000. That isn't a photo copy of a photocopy. It is a color photocopy that was in my mothers possession and then given to me when I had my wallet stolen in Arizona in 2000 on the way to San Diego.







If this black and white is just something I photocopied from something I already had, tell me where did I get the additional information from? While you are at it, where are the water marks that are clearly there in the color copy, which isn't a part of the original, its a mark on the paper you see in the picture. Where is the staple? It is PHYSICALLY present on my copy! WHERE ARE THE FOLD MARKS?

It is OBVIOUS. The black and white photo copy was NOT made from mine. It was sent to me by HDOH after THEY photocopied my Long Form which is in their possession.

These photos were taken by me just now with my iPhone.

Face it. You have lost this round.

[Red Steel]

Oh, you just slammed them and the UnCurious. ;-)

[Tex-Con-Man]

Can you provide any college transcripts? Kindergarten records? Social Security numbers? Pictures of you with old boyfriends? Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the communist party? CIA?

Inspector Smith is currently trying to sell a copy of your real Iowa birth certificate on ebay. I am currently the high bidder at $2.39, but there's 6 days left.

[Mr Rogers]

I’m not a lawyer. Here is what the State Department says:

“Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1481), as amended, states that U.S. citizens are subject to loss of citizenship if they perform certain specified acts voluntarily and with the intention to relinquish U.S. citizenship. Briefly stated, these acts include:

1. obtaining naturalization in a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (1) INA);
2. taking an oath, affirmation or other formal declaration to a foreign state or its political subdivisions (Sec. 349 (a) (2) INA);
3. entering or serving in the armed forces of a foreign state engaged in hostilities against the U.S. or serving as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer in the armed forces of a foreign state (Sec. 349 (a) (3) INA);
4. accepting employment with a foreign government if (a) one has the nationality of that foreign state or (b) an oath or declaration of allegiance is required in accepting the position (Sec. 349 (a) (4) INA);
5. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship before a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer outside the United States (sec. 349 (a) (5) INA);
6. formally renouncing U.S. citizenship within the U.S. (but only under strict, narrow statutory conditions) (Sec. 349 (a) (6) INA);
7. conviction for an act of treason (Sec. 349 (a) (7) INA).

ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OF EVIDENCE

As already noted, the actions listed above can cause loss of U.S. citizenship only if performed voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing U.S. citizenship. The Department has a uniform administrative standard of evidence based on the premise that U.S. citizens intend to retain United States citizenship when they obtain naturalization in a foreign state, subscribe to a declaration of allegiance to a foreign state, serve in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or accept non-policy level employment with a foreign government.

DISPOSITION OF CASES WHEN ADMINISTRATIVE PREMISE IS APPLICABLE

In light of the administrative premise discussed above, a person who:

1. is naturalized in a foreign country;
2. takes a routine oath of allegiance to a foreign state;
3. serves in the armed forces of a foreign state not engaged in hostilities with the United States, or
4. accepts non-policy level employment with a foreign government,

and in so doing wishes to retain U.S. citizenship need not submit prior to the commission of a potentially expatriating act a statement or evidence of his or her intent to retain U.S. citizenship since such an intent will be presumed.

When, as the result of an individual’s inquiry or an individual’s application for registration or a passport it comes to the attention of a U.S. consular officer that a U.S. citizen has performed an act made potentially expatriating by Sections 349(a)(1), 349(a)(2), 349(a)(3) or 349(a)(4) as described above, the consular officer will simply ask the applicant if there was intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship when performing the act. If the answer is no, the consular officer will certify that it was not the person’s intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship and, consequently, find that the person has retained U.S. citizenship.

http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_778.html

[Danae]

Thank you Star!

I am an honorable person. It is a personal quality I value above ALL others from and in other people, and in myself. It irks me to be called a liar, because I tell the truth deliberately. When I am wrong, I admit it and accept personal responsibility for it. That right there is more than these morons are capable of.

For what ever its worth, check out post 1545. I took iPhone pics of everything I have. Envelope and all, COLB, Long forms you got it. Receipts bla bla bla.

I don’t know that it will change any of those minds so bent on protecting OholyO. But you all will know that I am being completely up-front, and that DOES matter to me a great deal.

[Danae]

Uh.. yea, I can.. but I am not gonna. And its only 6.28?

You are kidding right?

LOL

[Danae]

Oops... 2.39? What a rip off. Postage costs more than that... LOL

[Tex-Con-Man]

You are kidding right?

Almost always...except when I'm not.

[danamco]

Wow, you just a baby, LOL!!!

[DJ MacWoW]

Great googly moogly I have a kid your age!

[Danae]

I feel kinda young now! LOL But then everyone and their dog knows I was born in ‘69 LOL.

[danamco]

Hi Sweetie, I hope you won’t experience same garbage here as you did with Polarik. Just stay your course!!!

[Danae]

You and me both! Thank you for your words of kindness! It really does help!

Check post 1545. I put it all up.

[El Sordo]

“Inspector Smith is currently trying to sell a copy of your real Iowa birth certificate on ebay...”

I call BS on that BC. It’s common knowledge that travel to Iowa was banned for Americans at the time Smith claimed to have been there.

[Red Steel]

Jameseeeee see the link below for your information.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2606951/posts?page=1545#1545

[DJ MacWoW]

LOL!! I told you that you were just a baby. :-D