Posted on 04/30/2011 10:17:36 AM PDT by unspun
Searchlights on this now, so it doesn't just slip by unattended
April 29, 20011 @ 8:48am CT
Please pardon me for being so ignorant.
I knew that one Ed R. (Edmund Leopold de Rothschild) was a primary backer of the man-made global Marxofascism of Maurice Strong. What I did not know was that it was another Eddie R's loot, whatever set of objectives were coupled with it, which fed George Soros' rise to power. Ignorant, that is, till a flitting tweet presented Arnaud de Borchgrave's April 28th article, "Geneva Gnome's Global Dread."
And this is how his editor's report in the Washington Times begins.
The Gnomes of Zurich were derogatory caricatures of secretive, greedy, stiff Swiss-German bankers, pince-nez aquiver, who ruled over the land of secret numbered accounts for tax dodgers the world over. With the world’s best financial intelligence service, they knew their stuff and seldom spoke, even in retirement.Aside from Mr. Karlweis and his moralizing with New World Orderling of the pseudoconservative kind, de Borchgrave, should these Rothschild relationships not bear our interest?Their Geneva counterparts in French-speaking Switzerland were more sophisticated, relaxed in the company of global wheeler-dealers, and weren’t afraid to speak their minds, albeit off the record. Such was George C. Karlweis, the brain behind Banque Privee, owned by the late Baron Edmond de Rothschild. His biggest claim to fame: George Soros and the launch of his Quantum Fund in 1969.
An original $100,000 stake in Mr. Soros’ fund was worth $150 million by 1994. Between 1970 and 2000, the return was 3,365 percent. (For 10 consecutive years, it did 42.6 percent per year.) In 1992, Mr. Soros bet billions against the British pound - and broke the Bank of England (“Black Wednesday”).
So the man behind Mr. Soros’ original success is worth listening to today - unafraid to speak his mind in retirement.
Strong's E.R. lived from 1916 to 2009. Soros' spanned 1929-1997. Maybe Gyorgi was harder on his. Now there are articles on the 'net of varying veracity, about the Soros-Rothschild relationship, but should this rock hard fact not be common knowledge?
If you happen to be one to tolerate net-radio archives, you may want to know that last Gulag Night, AJ of Noisy Room, Tallulah Starr, CJ in TX, and I talked us up some central banker. And along with a caller named Phil, we discussed the hypothesis (one wouldn't want to call it a conspiracy theory) that bye and large, the history of the global socialist/communist movement and the saga of the currency debauching central banking complex are the history of the same. No wonder they get together and plan for global collectivism, especially this Bankster Spring.
That is not to say that every single person involved with the corruptions of central banking must intentionally be fomenting Marxism; no more than to say every Marxist is excited about finance. But there is mounting evidence of close associations over not only decades but centuries, associations not only of people but of their intentions and one thing is certain.
Now, there is more for us to discuss, no matter how tender one must be toward the ethnic sensitivities involved.
More to write, too, but for me, after more reading -- and a second apology if you are familiar with all this, already.
Railing against Rothchilds is normally associate with anti-semitism.
Criticizing the President is usually associated with racism. They’re both just a ploy used to quell reasonable debate.
Do you really believe that followers of Christ would manipulate currency in order to take from the masses?
Except in the case of Rothschild anti-semitism has a history.
Obama hasn’t been persecuted a day in his life. If anything, he’s been helped along at innumerable junctures.
no matter the name, the rich elite in this world just want power and they want the little people controlled....close off wildlands and ocean beaches in the name of "conservation" and "protection" of animals....tax all the workers so they can never compete with the rich...wall off the schools so the children never learn of any other way...
gated communities and private schools and country clubs for them....and yet so many muddy brained young people think the Pubs are the bad ones...
Yes, you’re got that 100% correct.
I don’t think it is the Rothschild family.
“Do you really believe that followers of Christ would manipulate currency in order to take from the masses?”
Yes. They’ve done it many times before.
For your interest.
Rothschild’s are an evil bunch and have never been on our side....go back and research all the wars and especially WWI and WWII...
Do you have any evidence of this?
Damn, you're good. I got a name for you, the Sultan of Brunei. Leader of the 2nd group you just wrote about.
If you have proof anyone here is a Nazi please give some proof
The Rothschild gang...i think used to be two families actually..the British and Continental ones have chosen poor sides at times in the past and ifthey are in bed with George Soros this time then pointing that out means nothing sinister about Jews except that they are ones...which is simply a fact
If I say most Jews are progressives...an undebatable fact...is that an opening salvo in an attack on Jews in general or just the prog ones?
What if I say most southern Baptists are social conservatives...is that generalizing evil?
Pentecostals?
Truth is merely truth....its like the gun analogy..guns don't hurt people..people do.....replace guns with truth
Sometimes hard truths are unpleasant but we have to hear them
In today's culture we ignore many unpleasant but glaring truths about any group except white Christians...who are fair game
Its stupid and suicidal as a culture
If its true the Rothschild are in bed with Soros then the ramifications of that are a bed of their on making and fear of anti Semitism should not excuse them
that said they are simply not big enough anymore to warrant too much New World Order talk anymore....their total family share in their bank holding company is valued at less than half a billion today...small taters by todays benchmarks
I suspect the same, that Soros is a front man for a mystery clique. I haven't figured out for myself who that is. Lots of monied hangers-on downstream of Soros (Tides et al), but who is upstream from him is my question.
A single individual with a bankroll can clearly do a lot of damage but I find it hard to believe he is alone in this.
“I don’t often post Gulag Bound”
A policy you should have continued. This article is seguing into antisemitism.
Nonetheless, it is a provable statement that when Rothschilds come up there is a correlation with anti-semitism also coming up.
What’s with the red pin on his lapel?
Google Golden Chain for a bigger list of the money men behind Osama.
Regarding Soros, like I've been saying, I'm sure that there are a number of money men upstream of him, people who prefer not to be openly identified for what they are. They use Soros as an expendable public front and liaison between them and the radical "progressive" groups, as well as a discrete conduit for their money and support.
For Soros to operate the way he does, he needs to be part of a network of people, in government, in banking, in radical groups, who can supply information as needed, and apply influence as desired.
Yeah, but who funded and supported the Rothchilds, and who funded and supported those guys? Very mysterious, this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.