delenda est...
Posted on 09/03/2011 5:23:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
In “Batman,” the Joker rhetorically asks a young Bruce Wayne: “Tell me, kid – you ever danced with the devil by the pale moonlight?” Well, I have. Not by the pale moonlight, but in a brightly lit Four Points Sheraton in Baltimore, Md.
On Wednesday, Aug. 17, I – along with the venerable child advocate Dr. Judith Reisman – attended a conference hosted by the pedophile group B4U-ACT. Around 50 individuals were in attendance, including a number of admitted pedophiles (or “minor-attracted persons” [MAPs] as they euphemistically prefer), a few self-described “gay activists” and several supportive mental-health professionals. World renowned “sexologist” Dr. Fred Berlin of Johns Hopkins University gave the keynote address, saying: “I want to completely support the goal of B4U-ACT.”
Here are some highlights from the conference: • Pedophiles are “unfairly stigmatized and demonized” by society. • There was concern about “vice-laden diagnostic criteria” and “cultural baggage of wrongfulness.” • “We are not required to interfere with or inhibit our child’s sexuality.” • “Children are not inherently unable to consent” to sex with an adult. • “In Western culture sex is taken too seriously.” • “Anglo-American standard on age of consent is new [and ‘Puritanical’]. In Europe it was always set at 10 or 12. Ages of consent beyond that are relatively new and very strange, especially for boys. They’ve always been able to have sex at any age.” • An adult’s desire to have sex with children is “normative.” • Our society should “maximize individual liberty. … We have a highly moralistic society that is not consistent with liberty.” • “Assuming children are unable to consent lends itself to criminalization and stigmatization.” • “These things are not black and white; there are various shades of gray.” • A consensus belief by both speakers and pedophiles in attendance was that, because it vilifies MAPs, pedophilia should be removed as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in the same manner homosexuality was removed in 1973. • Dr. Fred Berlin acknowledged that it was political activism, similar to the incrementalist strategy witnessed at the conference, rather than a scientific calculus that successfully led to the declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder: The reason “homosexuality was taken out of DSM is that people didn’t want the government in the bedroom,” he said. • The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adults love one another. • “The majority of pedophiles are gentle and rational.” • The DSM should “focus on the needs” of the pedophile, and should have “a minimal focus on social control,” rather than obsessing about the “need to protect children.” • Self-described “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it. He then used graphic, slang language to favorably describe the act of climaxing (ejaculating) “on or with” a child. No one in attendance objected to this explicit depiction of child sexual assault. There was even laughter. (In fairness, Dr. Berlin did later tell Mr. Breslow that his words might “anger” some people and that he [Berlin] is categorically opposed to adult-child sex with “pre-pubescent” children. When asked about the propriety of adult-child sex with pubescent children, Dr. Berlin did not provide a clear answer.)
So, am I just an intolerant, “pedophobic” bigot? Apparently so. In fact, Dr. Berlin says pedophilia is just another “sexual orientation.” Some of the “minor attracted” conference-goers insisted that they were “born that way.” Sound familiar?
This is sexual anarchy – fulfillment of the moral relativist dream.
In the 1940s, homosexual psychopath and secular-humanist messiah Alfred Kinsey's stated goal was to destroy, in society, the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. He has largely achieved that goal.
Indeed, during his sexology “research,” Kinsey facilitated the rape of thousands of children – some as young as 2 months old – placing stopwatches and ledgers in the hands of “minor-attracted persons” to document their “findings.” He then recorded everything in what is generally referred to as the “Kinsey Reports.”
Kinsey determined, among many things, that children are not harmed by sex with adults and that it can be a positive experience. Old Al even earned his very own Kinsey Institute, still in existence today at Indiana University.
As recently as 1998, the APA seemed to agree with Kinsey's assessment, releasing a report that suggested harm caused by child rape was “overstated” and that “the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from their child sexual abuse experiences.”
Furthermore, the APA report suggested that the term “child sex abuse” be swapped with “adult-child sex,” indicating, as did Kinsey, that such “intergenerational intimacy” can be “positive.” Isn't “tolerance” wonderful?
Oh, and the “progressive,” political-activist APA has also seen fit to join an amicus brief in favor of so-called “same-sex marriage.” What does this have to do with psychiatry? Your guess is as good as mine.
Make no mistake: Children are the target of what I call the “sexual anarchy movement.” Whether it's the movement's pedophile wing that seeks to literally rape children, or its radical pro-abortion, homosexualist and feminist wings, which seek to rape the minds of children, the larger sexual anarchy movement has a shared goal: Attack, corrupt and destroy God's design for human sexuality. Children are just collateral damage.
Sexual anarchists know that to own the future, they must own the minds of our children. Hence, groups like B4U-ACT, GLSEN (The Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network), Planned Parenthood and the like utilize academia from pre-school to post-graduate to brainwash and indoctrinate. Still, sexual anarchists are not restricted to the world of not-for-profit perversion advocacy. They also permeate the Obama administration.
Consider, for instance, that the official website for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently linked to “parenting tips” that referenced children as “sexual beings” and suggested that they should experiment with homosexuality and masturbation.
Small surprise when you consider that radical feminist and pro-abort Kathleen Sebelius was President Obama's pick as HHS secretary.
You may also recall that Mr. Obama appointed Kevin Jennings, founder of the aforementioned GLSEN, to the post of “safe schools czar.” The position is now defunct, ostensibly due to national outrage over Jennings' appointment.
In keeping with the thinly veiled goals of B4U-ACT, GLSEN seems to be “running interference” for pedophiles, having tacitly advocated adult-child sex through its “recommended reading list” for kids.
Again, not surprising when you consider that one of Jennings's ideological mentors is “gay” activist pioneer Harry Hay. “One of the people that's always inspired me is Harry Hay,” he has said glowingly.
What did Mr. Hay think? I'll let him speak for himself. In 1983, while addressing the pedophile North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), Hay said the following:
“[I]t seems to me that in the gay community the people who should be running interference for NAMBLA are the parents and friends of gays. Because if the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world. And they would be welcoming this, and welcoming the opportunity for young gay kids to have the kind of experience that they would need.”
(Oddly, there's another “gay” activist group, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, or PFLAG, that frequently partners with GLSEN. I wonder where they came up with the catchy title.)
Bolstered by support from the National Education Association, GLSEN has access to your children through sex education curricula it provides thousands of public schools across the country, and via adult sponsored “Gay Straight Alliances,” hosted in those same schools.
Alas, we live in a post-Kinsey America wherein our culture, along with our Judeo-Christian heritage, rots in the heat of the day. The stench of sexual anarchy is masked by the soaring, disingenuous rhetoric of “tolerance,” “diversity” and “comprehensive sex education.”
Sick to your stomach? I am. Why can't these sexual anarchists leave our children alone and let kids be kids?
All I can say is,”touch my grandkids sexually.. Free ride in a wood chipper... feet first and inserted very slowly.”
Anyone who opposes sex with kids would probably think Gorebal Warming is junk science and is a racist.
You could start a support group and push for normalizing this activity. After all it's been done in Europe for thousands of years so that makes it Ok! /S
Like this, from the article:
Self-described “gay activist” and speaker Jacob Breslow said that children can properly be “the object of our attraction.” He further objectified children, suggesting that pedophiles needn’t gain consent from a child to have sex with “it” any more than we need consent from a shoe to wear it.
Makes me want to look up Jacob Breslow and do violence to him, to me he's worth much less than a shoe.
Mr. Frits van Paasschen
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
1111 Westchester Avenue
White Plains, NY 10604
Subject: Conflict with Starwood’s Human Rights Policy Statement
Protection of the Rights of Children
Dear Mr. van Paasschen:
As a man of integrity, you are likely unaware of the serious noncompliance with Starworld Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. corporate policy concerning protection of the rights of children.
From the enclosed article, the management at your Four Points Sheraton property in Baltimore, Maryland not only breached this clearly stated and important policy statement, your representatives may have violated various state and federal laws and have certainly acted in an indecent manner by supporting the efforts of B4U-ACT to normalize, if not legalize, pedophilia in the United States. By providing meeting space and resources, the hotel management has effectively given the imprimatur of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. to this organization, much as they would have if the hotel would have booked, say, a conference promoting the benefits of a return to slavery. Based on the published goals of B4U-ACT, the comparison is valid.
I suggest that you either remove or at minimum discipline the management at Four Points Sheraton in Baltimore for their violation of Starwood’s Human Rights Policy Statement, or remove the Protection of the Rights of Children portion of the statement to avoid sending a conflicting message to your employees.
Sincerely,
STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC. HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY STATEMENT (Excerpt)
Protection of the Rights of Children
Starwood condemns all forms of exploitation of children. The Company does not recruit child labor, and supports the elimination of exploitative child labor. Starwood also supports laws duly enacted to prevent and punish the crime of sexual exploitation of children. Starwood will work to raise awareness concerning such exploitation, and will cooperate with law enforcement authorities to address any such instances of exploitation of which the Company becomes aware.
By the way, Jacob Breslow’s interests lie toward little boys, not girls. It doesn’t make him any more or less vile than an heterosexual pervert but it signifies which group is primarily behind this outrage.
Somebody hurts one of my grands or great grands, I kill them, pure and simple. I’m 66 years old and live in a no death penalty state, the state can support me in prison for the rest of my life. How long can that be at age 66 already?
Some time in my life, 50+ years, I was taught that the world was becoming a better place. Of course, I now know that this was just a bunch of progressive baloney used to conceal the advancement an immoral and evil agenda upon the innocent, the ignorant and the unquestioning.
Growing up, my Bible always seemed to fall open to the following Bible verse which I took as a sign of guidance.
Psalm 37: 1 A Psalm of David. Fret not yourself because of the wicked, be not envious of wrongdoers! 2 For they will soon fade like the grass, and wither like the green herb. 3 Trust in the LORD, and do good; so you will dwell in the land, and enjoy security....Amen
You could say that this “psychological group” is “looking through the glass (mirror) wrongly” as they have a distorted view of what is right, what is wrong and what the meaning of liberty is. To me liberty means the right not to be imposed upon as well as the responsibility not to impose upon. And only a morally good and Godly people can balance as lofty a right as liberty.
You are absolutely right. Sometimes the idea of liberty is distorted for the benefit of those who live on the fringe. (by fringe, I am taking a hard core definition). For example, this same group would say it is a “liberty” to sell babies, toddler, children to be raped. It is a “freedom”, right? It is certainly pushing the extreme sense of the word. Freedom and liberty does go hand in hand with how it affects other people... especially negatively.
Could it be that at its very core, the homosexual movement is really just a front for pedophilia?
delenda est...
“I feel like I’m living in an alternate reality. I cannot believe this is happening.”
Believe it. This is what happens when “progressive” liberalism takes control of education and the media, as government is sure to follow in the footsteps.
You ain’t seen the half of it yet. Very soon every degenerate sex act that a perverted mind can iminage will be legal and every good and decent deed will be illegal. As November 2008 showed, the inmates are now running the assylumn.
When the good Lord decides to zot these vile people, they will have deserved it. He has given them every chance to see the truth.
” The DSM ignores that pedophiles “have feelings of love and romance for children” in the same way adults love one another.”
Are you freaking kidding me? The true definition of love is commitment. My husband and I love each other and because of our love we made vows to never leave each other, “forsaking all others.”
As a pedophile, by definition you cannot commit to a child because the child will grow up and then the “minor attracted person” (barf barf BARF) will move on to some other kid. Hardly “forsaking all others.”
Of course, the definition of love is different these days. It is a fleeting feeling. Of course the homos think temporary emotion constitutes love, or temporary physical gratification.
You know, on another thread, I was debating whether pornagraphy could be beneficial to society in any way, such as in preventing rape rates. Somebody (little jeremiah I think) pointed out that my argument was duplicitous and that got me to thinking.
They were right. My thinking was not consistent. The whole temporary-ness of sexual gratification that pornagraphy encourages only exacerbates this kind of behavior. I hope that little jeremiah and DJMacWow can accept my sincere apology. I am young and still developing my worldview, and I like to examine things from multiple sides. It is my goal to develop a worldview consitent with the Christian faith. I want to thank these two for making me really examine what I was saying. I hope they can forgive me for my brashness (I was being a bit of a jerk) and ignorance.
But this thread really has nothing to do with pornography, that is simply and aside.
What a vile, vomit inducing article. I am sick now, but thanks for posting this, Kaslin. Being informed of the truth is our best weapon in this society of lies.
I frequently argued with democrats that pedophilia and homosexuality are similar. “That’s disgusting!” They’d always cry back. Well, now the professionals are saying it. And it’s supposed to be a good thing.
Thanks to everyone on this site who has helped me defining my understanding of society and politics.
Amen!
Since children are not safe in these peoples neighborhoods so too should fear live in the hearts of these vile perverts.
Even gangsters, gang bangers and thugs would love to pay this lowest of human scum a visit.
The law now protects them. It is the good decent people who now live in fear. The good , decent , moral individuals are now who the authorties fear. Proof? te “gun control” laws and laws that prevent people from defending themselves if they do not wish to run afoul of the law.
You may benefit from watching this. I learned something. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.