Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh mocks GOP establishment
Politico ^ | 02-08-12 | MJ Lee

Posted on 02/08/2012 12:20:41 PM PST by Lazlo in PA

Rush Limbaugh mocked the Republican establishment on his radio show Wednesday for being “shocked” by Rick Santorum’s three-state win, saying, “I can’t believe how insulated they are.”

“They’re literally shocked. The Republican establishment had no idea this was percolating out there. I can’t believe how insulated they are,” Limbaugh said. “To look at the reaction they’re having today, to see how shocked they are that Rick Santorum has come out of what they thought was an impossible position equivalent to nowhere, is an incredible thing.”

The “drive-bys” – a term that Limbaugh has coined for the media – have been crediting the conservative radio talker for Santorum’s trifecta victory Tuesday by spreading around the notion that “the Republican base is a bunch of mind-numbed robots sitting out there waiting for marching orders from me,” the conservative radio show host said.

“First it was Newt, now it’s Santorum. It can’t be the candidates. It can’t be that Santorum’s connecting with voters. It can’t be that, no, no, it can’t be that Santorum’s resonating with Republican voters, the conservative base. It can’t be that the conservative base just isn’t happy with Romney. It can’t be any of that. No, no, no,” he said, according to a transcript of the show.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: rushlimbaugh; rushlive; santorumwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: Lucky9teen
Only the last of the three makes any sense. His defense of the first two are thin soup--no true conservative would have supported that Rino p/s Specter, and no true conservative supports earmarks.

Lets face it, Santorum is a "least worst" choice for conservatives.

81 posted on 02/08/2012 5:20:05 PM PST by Czar (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

“I guess winning Missouri is easy when Gingrich isn’t even on the ballot.”

Ok, fair enough. Tell us how Newt did in the states where he WAS on the ballot.


82 posted on 02/08/2012 5:21:13 PM PST by Grunthor (Mitt Romney and anyone supporting him can go fornicate themselves with a cactus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: no dems
Karl Rove was on FOX last night with Brett Baier’s special election coverage. Poor Karl looked so sad..... I felt sorry for him. (Chuckle, chuckle..... yeah; right.)

He sure was missing today. He must have been crying in his beer

83 posted on 02/08/2012 5:22:24 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
Newt loves his big government just as much as Santorum if not more. To pretend that Newt is a consistent, principled, small-government conservative is just not reality.
84 posted on 02/08/2012 5:26:34 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I think Newt can win despite his baggage, so long as he doesn’t revert back to his tendency to self-destruct with some crazy new idea or some terrible gaffe.


85 posted on 02/08/2012 5:26:34 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Gingrich BLEW OFF Missouri as unimportant. Santorum took the time and $1000 to get on the ballot.

I’m from MO. Gingrich disrespected us. Santorum will take the caucus in March due to Gingrich’s attitude toward MO.


86 posted on 02/08/2012 5:30:11 PM PST by magritte (Nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
Rush's brother already endorsed Santorum

Let's Honor, Not Stretch, the Buckley Rule

-- snip-- to last paraph

I reject the conventional wisdom that Rick Santorum could not win the general election, because I believe he represents the best contrast to Obama and is the least vulnerable to attack, among other reasons. I have varying concerns about the other candidates, but I respect their respective supporters and realize that some of them even believe their candidate is the most conservative of the group, though I disagree. I will support whoever emerges as the Republican nominee, but I do not apologize for supporting Rick Santorum.

87 posted on 02/08/2012 5:31:34 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Ain’t none of ‘em worth a damn!


88 posted on 02/08/2012 5:32:35 PM PST by Nachoman (I HOPE we CHANGE presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the Smoke       Thank you, JoeProBono

He's cute and tiny
But they grow up so fast


Become a monthly donor and kill the FReepathon dragons
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly sign-up

89 posted on 02/08/2012 5:45:29 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
I've always been curious why registered Republicans think Independents will not vote for conservatives.
Is it due to MSM polling data? LOL!
I don't participate in telephone polls, do you?
I did answer a few Republican surveys I received a decade ago, but stopped doing that many years ago. Why would I want to give the RNC a donation, when they tend not to support conservative candidates, and ignore their own published platform positions?
It's like giving money to a slush fund to elect RINOs I personally detest, and don't want to vote for.
I've toyed with registering as an Independent often enough myself, due to the leftward tilt of the GOP over the past few decades to comprehend Independents as people politically aware, and fed up with the false premise of the current two party system.

BTW, based on polls (LOL) people who identify themselves as conservatives are over 60% of the electorate. Just saying....

90 posted on 02/08/2012 5:46:40 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: magritte

I’m from MO, too, and I think it’s wise to conserve resources and not bother with us since it counted for jack squat. We weren’t dissed, our state congress screwed up. If you want to count, go to your local caucus next month.


91 posted on 02/08/2012 5:50:17 PM PST by Marie Antoinette (Proud Clinton-hater since 1998.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Marie Antoinette

I may caucus, and if I do I’ll go with a candidate that made the effort to be on our primary ballot. I won’t for the guy that took a cruise instead.


92 posted on 02/08/2012 5:58:30 PM PST by magritte (Nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen; b9

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105

Santorum voted to confirm Sonja Sotomayer..heck, even McCain voted NAY.


93 posted on 02/08/2012 7:01:41 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
This is impossible. Santorum wasn't even IN the senate at the time!
94 posted on 02/08/2012 7:07:56 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio

What Newt accomplished as Speaker of the House exceeds anything ever done by Santorum or any other candidate running; btw, you do know that Santorum endorsed the very liberal Sonya Sotomyer as even McCain and Thompson voted nay.
Also, being named Porker of the Month as Santorum was is quite an accomplishment for a “conservative” he was cited along with Hillary Clinton and Lieberman. Would be happy to provide you with the link and details if you wish.


95 posted on 02/08/2012 7:10:08 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Santorum lost his seat in 2006...Obama took office in 2009. The earliest Sotomayer could have been nominated was 2009, Rick never had a chance to vote on her.


96 posted on 02/08/2012 7:11:07 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105

Santorum voted to confirm Sonja Sotomayer..heck, even McCain voted NAY.


97 posted on 02/08/2012 7:12:07 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

And Newt endorsed Dede Scozzafava. Who cares? Everyone has to make some crappy endorsements sometimes...Palin had to do it for McCain. Newt still believes in man-made global warming and is soft on illegal immigration...two of the most important issues of the day.


98 posted on 02/08/2012 7:15:36 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Your link shows nothing...but it doesn’t matter. Santorum could NOT have voted to confirm Sotomayer. His last day in the Senate was January 3rd, 2007.


99 posted on 02/08/2012 7:21:18 PM PST by bushinohio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: bushinohio

I will ccp the info for you. It is under nominations. Sonja Sotomayor was nominated for the circuit court of appeals by BILL CLINTON (before Obama nominated her for the scotus) Sotomayors confirmation during the Clinton presidency was slowed down by the republicans in the senate BUT your man Little Ricky did vote for her! that is a easily confirmed fact.


100 posted on 02/08/2012 7:25:12 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson