Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Reagan endorses Romney's bid for president
Boston Globe ^ | May 31, 2012 | AP

Posted on 05/31/2012 9:56:41 PM PDT by Innovative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-393 next last
To: ansel12
I have no idea what you are talking about.

I never said anything even remotely like that.

321 posted on 06/01/2012 8:57:21 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

You didn’t post anything showing that she was conservative, or political about any cause except being for abortion.

I guess you saw post 166?

Former first lady Nancy Reagan speaks out for abortion rights.
“I don’t give a damn about the Pro-Lifers,” and demanding that all mention of abortion be removed from the president’s 1987 State of the Union address.


322 posted on 06/01/2012 9:01:25 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: dead; Absolutely Nobama; NoLibZone
Sorry about that dead, it wasn't your post, what a mix-up Absolutely Nobama made, and then followed by my mistake.

I went back to post 42 to see your post dead, that Absolutely Nobama appeared to be quoting, and it turned out to be a post of mine responding to post 22 by NoLibZone.

The anti-freeper/Reagan post that Absolutely Nobama was quoting was actually post 22 by NoLibZone.

I have no idea why he pinged me and you to his post.

323 posted on 06/01/2012 9:16:21 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

She’s doing just fine. You should be ashamed of yourself. You’re acting like the vermin in the mainstream media. She endorsed someone you don’t like, so you’re trashing her. Quite frankly, nonsense like that belongs on Moveon.Dork, not FRee Republic.


324 posted on 06/01/2012 9:17:57 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:58:59......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; dead

Heck, I’m confused, too.


325 posted on 06/01/2012 9:22:17 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:58:59......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Absolutely Nobama
No problemo. It all makes total no sense now!

Have a good night all.

326 posted on 06/01/2012 9:26:25 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Give it a rest. You really should seek help.


327 posted on 06/01/2012 9:37:16 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Romney is a captiatlist. He is not for big government, he’s for the private sector. What part of that makes him a socailist other then the fact that you are name calling. Just saying something doesn’t make it true. Stop hating a good man. Nancy knows a good man when she sees one, cause she loved one. You don’t own Ronald Reagan, I was for Reagan right when I first heard him speak during the primary in the election of 1980. I voted for him the day after I turned 18, so don’t tell me I don’t know who Reagan was and that Romney is a socailist, cause you are talking out the side of your mouth. Drop your hatred.


328 posted on 06/01/2012 9:41:19 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
"Romney is a captiatlist. He is not for big government"

Then you don't know him at all. Go look up his record in Massachusetts. He was a big government Socialist, he was responsible for implementing government-controlled Socialist healthcare that inspired Zero to implement his. He appointed leftist judges across the board, one of whom was responsible for releasing the murderer of Brian & Beverly Mauck. Willard was one of the worst Governors in the country and absolutely antithetical to Conservatism and polar opposite to Reagan (SEE POST #12). You need to wake up and smell the Socialism.

329 posted on 06/01/2012 9:47:20 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Whatever.


330 posted on 06/01/2012 9:54:04 PM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:58:59......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

He balanced their budget, he brought them out of the red. What you said does not make him a socialist. He gave Massachusets what they wanted and he forced them to balance their books. Some socialist.


331 posted on 06/01/2012 9:55:20 PM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

You can stop repeating the talking points for his campaign, madam. I’ll inform you that it is part of the commonwealth law that MA must have a balanced budget. No Governor can take credit for that, since it is REQUIRED BY LAW. That means you’ve just made the argument that Democrats Michael Dukakis and Deval Patrick, also Socialist Governors like Willard, should be given the Republican nomination for President.


332 posted on 06/01/2012 9:59:13 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; BlackElk; EternalVigilance

Check out post #328 and below. This one is trotting out the old “but he balanced the budget” talking point. How quaint ! Have fun with the Willardbot.


333 posted on 06/01/2012 10:01:22 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
He gave Massachusets what they wanted

Not if he was booted from office with a 34% approval rating and had to give up his plan to run for a second term as he had announced.

334 posted on 06/01/2012 10:42:36 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
That's a nice piece of rhetoric right there. Thanks.

Here's the part I like best:

...and are busily working to fracture the only opposition they have by encouraging conservatives to leave the Republican Party in the hands of RINOS rather than working to take over the party apparatus as they, the Leftists, have taken over the Democrat Party.

Anyone who thinks that evil doesn't target good wherever it is does not understand evil.

The idea that conservatives might abandon the GOP to the RINOs and form their own conservative party without evil collectivists infiltrating that new conservative party from the get go is utterly childlike in its naivete.

Wherever we conservatives are, we will be battling lying collectivists within our midst. That is the way of this fallen world. Read the Bible. It's all there.

We can't run. We can't hide. We can't exist apart. We must face our enemy head-on and overcome it in order to have a place in this world.

Never before in the last generation has there been a grassroots conservative insurgency comparable to the tea party movement. We would be crazy to abandon this effort to retake the GOP for conservatism and instead split off into the wilderness, in smaller weaker numbers, with the seeds of collectivism yet among us.

335 posted on 06/01/2012 11:03:44 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Why are you actively helping the left ? This is a Conservative website.

I am promoting conservatism. Why are you helping Obama?

336 posted on 06/01/2012 11:07:09 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Don’t be a silly goose. All I see is you pimping Willard. He’s a Socialist.


337 posted on 06/01/2012 11:08:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

The things that you say in this reply simply are not true.


338 posted on 06/01/2012 11:10:20 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: rogue yam

Stop deluding yourself with your bizarre fantasy-fetish of Willard not being a Socialist. He is. Your “Myth” was busted a LONG time ago.


339 posted on 06/01/2012 11:17:16 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Produce evidence if you can that Nancy was “manipulated” in any way, manner, shape or form.

Or else shut up while you’re still not that far behind.


340 posted on 06/02/2012 12:35:46 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Let me ABOs run loose Lou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson