Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Todd Akin: Claire McCaskill was more ‘ladylike’ in 2006
Washington Post ^ | 27 September 2012 | Rachel Weiner

Posted on 09/27/2012 12:41:46 PM PDT by Lorianne

Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) reminds Republicans why they were hoping he would drop out of the U.S. Senate race against incumbent Claire McCaskill (D).

“I think we have a very clear path to victory, and, apparently, Claire McCaskill thinks we do, too, because she was very aggressive at the debate, which was quite different than it was when she ran against Jim Talent,” Akin told the Kansas City Star on Thursday.

“She had a confidence and was much more ladylike [in 2006], but in the debate on Friday she came out swinging, and I think that’s because she feels threatened.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: clairemccaskillloser; loser; mo2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
It was only a matter of time folks.

This guy is a liability.

1 posted on 09/27/2012 12:41:50 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

You better vote for Claire. It’s your only hope.


2 posted on 09/27/2012 12:43:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Oh please grow up, ladylike is now a dirty word?

The real story is Todd Akin breathed.


3 posted on 09/27/2012 12:44:31 PM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What’s wrong with what he said? (aside from the fact that it upsets the republicans for Claire)


4 posted on 09/27/2012 12:45:35 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Suggesting that Claire should talk a certain way because she is a woman is considered sexist.

Akin was already done. He is double done.


5 posted on 09/27/2012 12:47:32 PM PDT by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Can’t stand her ... but Akin is a LOSER.


6 posted on 09/27/2012 12:48:00 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
What’s wrong with what he said?

He called Claire McCaskill a (gasp) swinger!

7 posted on 09/27/2012 12:48:00 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity

You should send Claire a few bucks, since she’s your candidate-of-choice.


8 posted on 09/27/2012 12:48:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Can’t stand her and don’t live in MO.
But Akin is still a loser with a capital L.


9 posted on 09/27/2012 12:48:52 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
This guy is a liability.

When lies become the norm, telling the truth is a crime.

10 posted on 09/27/2012 12:49:22 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I’m among the non defeatists who are making contributions to help Akin in the absence of support from the despicable RNC and other GOPe.

I urge others to support him also and not allow yourself to be lulled into depression and pessimism.

http://www.akin.org/campaign/social-conservatives-are-fiscal-conservatives


11 posted on 09/27/2012 12:50:59 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
But Akin is still a loser with a capital L.

Why do you say that?

What did he say that is not true?

12 posted on 09/27/2012 12:51:08 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Didn’t say it’s a dirty word.
Akin apparently has run-on-at-the-mouth disease, saying things that just don’t need to be said, aren’t relevant, and DO NOT HELP HIM WIN.

It was only a matter of time.


13 posted on 09/27/2012 12:51:08 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I can remember when calling a woman ladylike was considered a compliment.

Things have changed, not for the better. But they have changed, and something like this just adds to the impression that Akin’s a clueless fossil. Maybe he should just shut up altogether and let his surrogates run the campaign until election day.


14 posted on 09/27/2012 12:51:31 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

psh- if you are offended by this you shouldn’t be in politics. It is only an issue because of his previous comments. Fact is he is still very much in this race, most believe it to be a horse race at this point. I don’t care for Akin much but the GOP would be smart to make some moves to help him.


15 posted on 09/27/2012 12:52:08 PM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
So you believe that nobody can be called a "gentleman" anymore?

How will Senators refer to each other from now on, given that they can no longer say "Gentleman from Missouri" or "Gentle Lady from Missouri?"

-PJ

16 posted on 09/27/2012 12:52:08 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( It doesn't I naturally when you're not natural born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

If your goal is to lose, nothing.


17 posted on 09/27/2012 12:52:22 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I don't think you want a male candidate opining on how a lady should act.

He still has some time to make up for it (and broken glass conservative voters could still make it happen in Nov.)...but this is a dumb comment.

18 posted on 09/27/2012 12:52:38 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Did you watch/listen to the debate? She wasn’t ladylike. She was shrill, angry, and attacking at every opportunity. She rarely presented any of her positions. Akin mopped the floor with her (hopefully, Rachel Weinier doesn’t think the term “mopped” insinuates McCaskill should be doing domestic chores), and now the press is worried he will start polling better.

I hope the GOP-e doesn’t wet themselves when they see this article, and renew their attacks on Akin.


19 posted on 09/27/2012 12:54:49 PM PDT by RabidBartender (If pigs could vote, they'd vote for the guy holding the slop bucket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HenryArmitage

You assume too much.
I am not offended in the least by Akin’s comment, I am vindicated!
The guy is an blithering idiot and I was right about him from the start. (Wish I weren’t and we could pick up a seat in the Senate ... but oh well).


20 posted on 09/27/2012 12:55:25 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson