Skip to comments.Joe Paterno family releases report
Posted on 02/10/2013 7:10:13 AM PST by Uncle Chip
A report commissioned by Joe Paterno's family calls the July 2012 Freeh report that was accepted by Penn State trustees before unprecedented sanctions were levied by the NCAA against the school's football program a "total failure" that is "full of fallacies, unsupported personal opinions, false allegations and biased assertions."
The Paterno family report, which targets nearly every conclusion and assertion the Freeh report made about Paterno in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, states that while former FBI director Louis J. Freeh has had an honorable past and good reputation, his investigation -- especially as it relates to Paterno -- relied on "rank speculation," "innuendo" and "subjective opinions" when it concluded that Paterno concealed facts about Sandusky in part to avoid bad publicity.
Freeh was hired on Nov. 21, 2011 and paid $6.5 million by Penn State University trustees --
The Paterno family immediately roundly and loudly rejected the report, and, four days after its release, instructed its lawyer to form a "group of experts" to conduct a comprehensive review of the facts and conclusions. The Paterno family asked its attorney's law firm, King and Spalding of Washington, D.C., to start "a comprehensive review of the report and Joe Paterno's conduct. They authorized us to engage the preeminent experts in their field and to obtain their independent analyses."
The law firm hired former U.S. attorney general Richard Thornburgh, former FBI supervisory special agent and former state prosecutor James Clemente, and Dr. Fred Berlin, a treating physician, psychiatrist, psychologist and expert in sexual disorders and pedophilia at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine. The family's report attacks Freeh's conclusions, assertions, methodology, investigative abilities and choices, disclosures and independence.
(Excerpt) Read more at espn.go.com ...
No liar, you stated, "He absolves the Trustees from any blame"
Maybe you are so ignorant you don't know the meaning of absolve.
Absolve | Define Absolve at Dictionary.com Absolve, acquit, exonerate all mean to free from blame. Absolve is a general word for this idea. To acquit is to release from a specific and usually formal accusation...
dictionary.reference.com/browse/absolve More results
Tou'd better deal with your own first. If you are representative of PSU, the institution should be even more ashamed.
The only mindless worshippers on this thread are the child molester apologists.
That's new to me and probably to them.
Can you name the Trustees who he claims participated in this Sandusky cover-up and exactly what he claims that they did???
Your spin and obfuscation is immature. Read this again and explain exactly what it is that you fail to comprehend.
"Freeh said Sandusky's conduct was in part a result of the school's lack of transparency, which stemmed from a "failure of governance" on the part of officials and the board of trustees.
Can you name the Trustees
The "board of trustees" is inclusive. They allowed the POS Sandusky access to the PSU facilities which he used to molest children.
Is he including them in the cover-up as well???
How is that relevant to your claim that Freeh absolved the board of trustees?
Because when you are "absolved", you are absolved of "something".
Absolution has an object or wrong from which you are absolved.
Read your definition.
Spanier, Schulz, Curley, Paterno were/are accused of a coverup of Sandusky's crimes.
Is the Board of Trustees accused of the coverup by Freeh as well or are they absolved of the coverup by Freeh???
Your spin and obfuscation is immature. Read this again and explain exactly what it is that you fail to comprehend. "Freeh said Sandusky's conduct was in part a result of the school's lack of transparency, which stemmed from a "failure of governance" on the part of officials and the board of trustees.
Cut the BS and answer the question.
Exactly. The dynamic of McQueary seeing what he saw Feb 2001; telling JoePa the next day. JoePa later telling the Grand Jury that yes, 'twas a "sexual act" involving a boy.
And then the timeline of McQueary coming on board as a coach in early 2004...somebody in such close proximity to Joe that Joe could have readily secured an "update" from McQueary on how -- or not...and what...or not that content of any discussions included.
Joe thought it more "convenient" for the Penn State reputation to leave that kid hanging int he wind...to be abused for yet another day...and day...and day...
Indeed...JoePa's apologists on this site are "inspirational" for other cover-up artists of pedophilia...
That's a lie.