Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glenn Beck plans to break damaging political news within a day
Examiner ^ | 6/12/13 | Christopher Collins

Posted on 06/12/2013 6:47:51 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55

Glenn Beck today on his show stated that he plans to break news within 24 hours that could take down the entire power structure of the government.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beck; belongsinchat; dramaqueen; glennbeck; itisnews; notnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-297 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Cover the top half of this picture and tell me WHO you see.

Whoa! Now that's creepy.

201 posted on 06/12/2013 9:53:43 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: John W

ROFL! That’s the first image I looked for when I saw this thread.


202 posted on 06/12/2013 9:55:02 PM PDT by LaybackLenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
The time for drip, drip, drip was during Barry’s first term. We now need a FLOOD and quickly.

What do you call the last couple of months?? No administration in history has had so many back to back scandals popping out of the woodwork in quick succession.

It's a veritable Scandalanche.

203 posted on 06/12/2013 9:58:02 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
After what happened to Breitbart, what idiot would make a preliminary announcement like this?

An idiot with 24/7 armed security...

204 posted on 06/12/2013 10:01:31 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Yes, but one that Obama seems to be insulated from.

I think the Benghazi die-hards are on to something. We are overlooking the golden question. WHO GAVE THE STAND-DOWN ORDER?
This is the question Obama wants as far from the headlines as possible. I think he gave the order.


205 posted on 06/12/2013 10:01:32 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“Maybe it will be true this time. His last revelations have been less than impressive.”

You should insert an audio of Darth Vader breathing for that line.


206 posted on 06/12/2013 10:05:08 PM PDT by Bshaw (,A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

.


207 posted on 06/12/2013 10:06:02 PM PDT by lonevoice (Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Errant
This takes time and coordination. Glenn met with over 50 senate and house members yesterday.

I'd heard that he met with Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Rand Paul, but 50 Senate and House members? Wow. That fact alone, begs that we give Glenn the benefit of the doubt this one last time, and cool our jets for a day.

Wow!

208 posted on 06/12/2013 10:13:19 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
I think we've all underestimated what it's going to take for the people to wake up to what's going down. What has come to light already would have brought down any previous presidency many times over. Glenn misjudged when he thought he had a smoking gun. Maybe he overhyped some, but that's what it takes to make it in his business, especially as an underdog in the game.

I've gotten upset with Beck about number of issues. Canceled my subscription twice - just renewed it again, a few weeks ago. I'm sticking with him now for the duration. Things are much more serious. I trust he will do the right thing by this whistle blower. If that takes a little time to accomplish, so be it.

209 posted on 06/12/2013 10:15:03 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
We will have to wait and see what comes out of this news that Glenn has.

Some mocked and the scoffers said that the Titanic was unsinkable, that God could not even sink the Titanic.


210 posted on 06/12/2013 10:19:02 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

IBIWISI
(I’ll Believe It When I See It)


211 posted on 06/12/2013 10:20:22 PM PDT by hoagy62 ("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
50 Senate and House members?

He said he did, 50 - 60 yesterday.

212 posted on 06/12/2013 10:20:42 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
We are overlooking the golden question. WHO GAVE THE STAND-DOWN ORDER? This is the question Obama wants as far from the headlines as possible. I think he gave the order.

Of course he did. Established US military protocols are well understood by most everyone in gov't, and especially Congress.

Only the President can give an order to stand down in a live fire event, so the real question is, why is Congress silent on this? Why haven't dozens of them gone before the cameras to explain that protocol to the American people, and demand Obama's head?

Now, before you answer, we have to consider the immense gravity of the act, and the potentially grave consequences to any faithful public servant who would be willing to say what should be said in public.

There's every chance that the situation is so dangerous on a personal level to everyone in Congress, that it's taking time to quietly, secretly gather enough patriots together to make a stand.

We're living in 'interesting times'. They're even more 'interesting' for those closest to the action. You can bet they're being extra cautious, and will not move until they've got everything in place.

213 posted on 06/12/2013 10:28:18 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Errant
"50 Senate and House members?"

He said he did, 50 - 60 yesterday.

I don't care how skeptical you are. That just screams, "This Is Huge".

You don't get an audience with that large a congressional contingent, unless you've got something of earth shattering national importance.

214 posted on 06/12/2013 10:32:57 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

So....now we know about the blackmail of Justice Roberts, Petraeus, and more than one member of the Congress, both HR and Senate. This was how they managed to get into Former Pres George W. Bush email back in February - remember his paintings? Deputy Director of CIA resigned TODAY!!!

Sorry, for any protocol (sp)violations


215 posted on 06/12/2013 10:33:08 PM PDT by V K Lee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: toddausauras
Nothing can bring down obama

Oh, yes, that's correct. If there were conclusive evidence that Obama was a Saudi agent, all Obama would have to do is go on TV and declare "I just saw on CNN that I am a Saudi agent. That is not acceptable. I have ordered a full investigation of me, lead by me, and to be reported to me."

Most Americans (including Congress) would be satisfied by that, and go back to watching Dancing With The Stars.

216 posted on 06/12/2013 10:38:10 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Agree - but there is always the possibility it could be squashed for the sake of the nation, whatever it is, in exchange for someone's resignation, let's say.
217 posted on 06/12/2013 10:40:09 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Errant
there is always the possibility it could be squashed for the sake of the nation, whatever it is, in exchange for someone's resignation, let's say.


218 posted on 06/12/2013 10:44:06 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
"It's a veritable Scandalanche."

Yes, but one that Obama seems to be insulated from.

It only appears that way because we Freepers are so far ahead of the average information curve. It took two years for Watergate to close in on Nixon.

These things take time to ferment. It's coming.

219 posted on 06/12/2013 10:48:32 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

That’s what I’m talking about! ;)


220 posted on 06/12/2013 10:48:46 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson