Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney: Instead of ObamaCare, I Would Require States Get Everyone Insured
The New American ^
| 05 November 2013
| Michael Tennant
Posted on 11/05/2013 8:46:08 PM PST by VitacoreVision
Mitt Romney told NBC News that if he'd been elected president, he would have replaced ObamaCare with a mandate that states guarantee that all their residents are insured.
Mitt Romney: Instead of ObamaCare, I Would Require States Get Everyone Insured
The New American
05 November 2013
Its official: If former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney had been elected president in 2012, ObamaCare would still be with us, albeit in slightly modified form. Last years Republican presidential nominee told NBCs David Gregory that as president, he too would have demanded that all Americans have health insurance; but unlike President Barack Obama, he would have ordered the states, rather than the federal government, to figure out how to make that happen.
Gregory began the November 3 edition of Meet the Press with a clip from a recent speech in which Obama praised Romney for doing the right thing on healthcare when he signed the 2006 legislation mandating that all Bay Staters have insurance. That law, of course, became the prototype for ObamaCare. In crafting the federal law, the Obama administration even consulted some of Romneys former advisors.
Gregory then asked Romney why he reject[ed] Obamas compliment a good question considering that while he was still running for president and ObamaCare hadnt begun visibly imploding, Romney said he took it as a compliment that Obama had called him the grandfather of ObamaCare. Today, with Healthcare.gov barely functioning, insurance rates skyrocketing, and insurance policies being canceled left and right, Romney wants nothing to do with his grandchild.
I think the president failed to learn the lessons that came from the experience of Massachusetts, Romney said. First of all, the Massachusetts experience was a state-run plan. The right way to deal with health care reform is not to have a one-size-fits-all plan thats imposed on all the states, but recognizing the differences between different states populations, states should be able to craft their own plans to get all their citizens insured, and to make sure that preexisting conditions are covered.
Romney also pointed out that Massachusetts phased in the requirements of its healthcare law over time to prevent major problems like the ones ObamaCare is experiencing, and he chastised Obama for telling Americans that they could keep their health insurance if they liked it. I think that fundamental dishonesty has really put in peril the whole foundation of his second term, he asserted.
Clearly, the fact that Obama was not forthright about his healthcare plans effects on peoples existing insurance policies was the main talking point Romney wanted to get across in this appearance. He kept returning to it every time Gregory tried to point out the similarities between Romneycare and ObamaCare.
Romney admitted that his healthcare law had cost many Bay State residents their insurance and suggested that Obama had to have known the same thing would happen under ObamaCare but kept it from the public as indeed he did. He also confessed that health insurance is more expensive in Massachusetts than anywhere else in the country and attributed that, at least in part, to Romneycare something he was loath to do prior to last November. And youre going to see, as a result of ObamaCare, premiums going up dramatically across the country, he added. That, too, is already occurring.
Despite all these negatives not to mention the fact that Romneycare has caused such high healthcare costs in Massachusetts that the state has imposed price controls on healthcare Romney still stands by his law as the right plan for Massachusetts, and possibly for the rest of the country. For all his paeans to federalism, Romney has long said the Massachusetts law should be a model for the nation.
In 2007, as Gregory reminded him by playing the tape of his appearance, Romney said, I think youre going to find, when its all said and done, after all these states that are laboratories of democracy get their chance to try their own plans, that those who follow the path that we pursued will find its the best path, and well end up with a nation thats taken a mandate approach.
You dont believe all the states should have adopted this, but you do believe that the entire nation should take a mandate approach, Gregory said. If it was good for Massachusetts, whats so wrong with taking it national?
The obvious answer, that a federal plan similar to Massachusetts is unconstitutional, did not escape Romneys lips, but he did again say that each state should be able ... to put in place the plan that works best for them.
This at least sounds like a man who understands that the federal government has no business dictating healthcare policy to the states. Based on his answer to a subsequent question, however, that is clearly not the case.
What would you have done? Gregory asked. Had you become president in my interview with you in the course of the campaign you said there were aspects of ObamaCare that you would want to keep, preexisting conditions, et cetera. What would you have done?
Well, Im not president so I cant be so clear minded as to tell you what I would have done, Romney replied. But my own plan was to say to each state, Youve got a requirement to move to a point where all your people are insured, and where you cover preexisting conditions. Were going to give you flexibility from the federal government level to help you be able to do so.
In other words, a President Romney would have sought to replace ObamaCare with ObamaCare Lite: a law enshrining the same faulty premises and mandates as ObamaCare with a thin veneer of federalism. This, of course, is no more constitutional than ObamaCare, and its effects would be roughly the same. After all, as Romney pointed out, ObamaCares failings are the same as those of Romneycare; and by requiring states to enact some variant of Romneycare, he would have ensured that those failings were replicated in each state just as surely as Obama has.
Anyone voting for Romney last year in hopes of ridding the country of ObamaCare got snookered.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: asshat; gope; healthcare; mittromney; obamacare; rino; romneycare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: VitacoreVision
It don’t matter one whit what you think, Mitt!
After you lose an election you are as relevant as all other election losers. Just ask Mourdock, Akin, Angle, O’Donnell.
21
posted on
11/05/2013 8:59:16 PM PST
by
entropy12
(Obama is succeeding in destroying economy & healthcare, and expanding freebies to his voters)
To: VitacoreVision
22
posted on
11/05/2013 8:59:18 PM PST
by
fabian
(" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
To: VitacoreVision
Just go away Mitt. We hardly knew youit was better we didn’t. Now I know why no one voted for you.
23
posted on
11/05/2013 8:59:23 PM PST
by
Fungi
To: EEGator
You made a good point. lol. Salvation Army...that is a good one and possibly true.
24
posted on
11/05/2013 8:59:33 PM PST
by
napscoordinator
( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
To: VitacoreVision
Mitt Romney: Instead of Chapter 7 bankruptcy, I would require States put everyone in Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
To: VitacoreVision
And that wouldn’t have been Constitutional, either.
26
posted on
11/05/2013 9:01:07 PM PST
by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom, not more government.)
To: VitacoreVision
If? If your aunt had balls she’d be your uncle. GO AWAY MITT, GO AWAY. You’re not going to (now) rise to the head of the party and deliver us from evil... that was of your making. FUMR.
27
posted on
11/05/2013 9:02:38 PM PST
by
freepersup
(Patrolling the waters off Free Republic one dhow at a time.)
To: fabian
Cha Ching! and party infighting.
28
posted on
11/05/2013 9:03:41 PM PST
by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: VitacoreVision
Time for a commercial break:
29
posted on
11/05/2013 9:03:45 PM PST
by
Slyfox
(Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
To: VitacoreVision
Romneycare (in all its iterations) = Commiecare
Because Romney is a socialist.
30
posted on
11/05/2013 9:04:40 PM PST
by
Waryone
To: VitacoreVision
“They” aren’t going to try to run Romney again, are they? Why ask the opinion of a loser?
To: jdsteel
Mitt Romney argued that it was unconstitutional Federally, but was constitutional in Massachusetts..
Is the New American a reputable paper?
32
posted on
11/05/2013 9:07:35 PM PST
by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: VitacoreVision
MUCK FITT
33
posted on
11/05/2013 9:08:13 PM PST
by
justrepublican
(Screaming a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
To: VitacoreVision
I never trusted Romney on repealing Obamacare.
I never trusted Romney on amnesty.
I never trusted Romney on homo-marriage.
I never trusted Romney on cap-and-trade.
The guy’s a Massachusetts liberal. The GOP showed it had contempt for my values and my views by nominating him. And chances are they will do it again with Christie. Hence, they will once again not get my vote.
34
posted on
11/05/2013 9:08:21 PM PST
by
greene66
To: sickoflibs
An unforgettable example of why the GOP establishment is NOT to be trusted.
35
posted on
11/05/2013 9:08:42 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: VitacoreVision
Sit down Mit, join Mclame in the loser’s club.
36
posted on
11/05/2013 9:09:52 PM PST
by
Huskrrrr
To: Ingtar
Amen! Being virtually indistinguishable from Obama on gun control, immigration, border enforcement and homosexuality did not attract any Democrats. Anyone claiming to be an independent in today’s political climate is too stupid to even care about voting, and it’s my belief few actually do vote, so no gains there. Non voters who use the reason there isn’t a dime’s difference between the parties were validated again, and they stayed home like many of the GOP base.
The GOPe spends their campaigns riding the fence, and on Election Day when they get a buttcrack full of splinters they blame the TEA Party and Libertarians.
37
posted on
11/05/2013 9:12:43 PM PST
by
noprogs
(Borders, Language, Culture)
To: VitacoreVision
No one gives a damn what you would require, you stinking loser republican.
38
posted on
11/05/2013 9:13:19 PM PST
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: BenLurkin
I fear that 2016 will be Chris Christie vs. Hillary Clinton.
I’ll be pissed if the GOP puts me in this position again, ie: John McCain, Mitt Romney.
To: BenLurkin
RE :”
An unforgettable example of why the GOP establishment is NOT to be trusted.” Or to put up REAL candidates in GOP POTUS primary or the GOPe one will get it again.
And after winning re-election so easily in a Blue state you-know-who is next up.
40
posted on
11/05/2013 9:14:45 PM PST
by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US Citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson