Posted on 11/19/2013 8:59:59 AM PST by llevrok
WA state ping
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahahahahahahahahahaha! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
She’ll never learn.
don’t you have to spend the money on the policy at the price quoated first and then when you file your tax return, you will receive a credit that will have brought that down to the subsidized price? so, you still have to spend the money.
There should be a Jessica's Law where people whose votes have been extorted by a known liar get relief from their embarassment.
The writer uses words that minimize the extent of the problem.
“bollixed-up”
“goofed”
“sputtering start”
I’m surprised he didn’t call it a “glitch.”
They want you to think it’s just a bunch of technical problems, and that the reader is too stupid to understand them.
This language is chosen deliberately to influence peoples’ views on the subject, and to make sure they think the correct thing: that 0’s people are doing a good job but there are these difficult nerdy problems that they had and are now solving.
ObamaCare has bigger problems than the website. The pain hasn’t even begun to start.
Her reaction shouldn’t be embarrassment - it should be anger. I’ll bet she could have afforded a policy 3 years - or at least 6 months - ago.
So is she going to put blame where it belongs?
A glitch used to be a minor imperfection in type setting before printing. This ain’t a glitch. This will destroy peoples lives and lively hood.
It needs to be repealed and those that supported it over the objections of the people need to be thrown out of office.
The point of all of this; is they don’t care. They don’t care about the non functional website; they don’t care if people can’t afford it.
Their only goal is TO GET A SINGLE PAYER STSTEM and have the govt totally control healthcare. The rest is smoke and mirrors.
Imbecile.
We’ve been trying to tell you that since the commies attempted Hillary-care in 1993. What made you think this would be an improvement on THAT horror.
Difference back then is the Congress read it before they voted on it, and opposition to it was not characterized as “racist”.
Schadenfreude!!!!!!
As opposed to 'disastrous', 'botched', "problem plagued", "failure filled" or any other negative description of a messed up program enacted by Republicans.
It really is complicated to figure out the costs when there are both commercial and Medicaid in the same family, whether done by software or by hand.
Jessica, say hello to the man with the empty stash
B-Slapped by reality! LOL! :)
Turns out free healthcare is really expensive.
What about ‘fairness’?
Isn’t it more ‘fair’ that you should work to pay for mine?
Tip of the iceberg.
I predict more and more people will find out they cannot afford Obamacare.
Even if it’s ‘free’ they can’t afford it.
Medicaid as a tax on the estates of the poor
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/11/medicaid-as-a-tax-on-the-estates-of-the-poor/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.