Posted on 07/27/2014 11:12:09 PM PDT by servo1969
I do not give a rats ass about this bogus study. Some women are more receptive during menstruation and some are not.
Work and understand your lady and or wife and everything will be okay.
I hope that my tax dollars did not fund this study. Relative to walking around in public with fake menstrual stains on one pants leads to only one conclusion, women do not do this thus the necessity for fake stains. However, in rare instances this does happen it should not be anything to be of notice nor even a study, this is simply life.
What rubbish the Prof. speaks........I recall clearly wearing white shorts at my first ever visit to Disneyland.....when red was not my choice of color to wear but ended up just that, with matching socks ta-boot!...... I can tell you it was beyond embarrassing.... Thank the Lord a woman gave me her sweater to tie around my waste until I could get back to the car (and we all know the distance to your car from center Disney)... and home!
Personal accidents are just that...”personal”....and not something you would ever choose to share with the public....not even a stain!
My wife once sent me to the supermarket for tampons. And I did it willingly enough, but as I was going out the door, she called out and asked me to get some ketchup while I was at it. So there I was, buying Tampax and ketchup. I think the cashier thought I was a bit weird.
The saddest thing is that some students actually took out student loans to pay for this idiocy masquerading as “education.”
Obama will pay their loans back probably
This “professor” is insane
I’m not into any of those things. I went to a real gut school , we didn’t even have intro to basket weaving for an easy A.
I’m just speechless.
It is a state university, so tax dollars are likely involved
This is diversity and anti-discrimination you see, and it validates Evan Sayet’s theories on liberal thinking quite perfectly.
See, crapping inside versus outside your pants are two equivocal outcomes, neither better than the other, and if you are so unfortunately myopic as to favor one outcome over the other, why, you are a bigot. You’re a shittist! You clearly cannot overcome your biases, your white privelege (if you happen to be white) or your underpriveleged upbringing if you happen not to be. Too bad for you, the benefits of diversity will surely elude you so long as you are run by your biases, your conditioning.
After all, there is nothing objectively wrong with walking around smelling like a toilet. There’s no discomfort walking around with excess liquid or solid matter inside your drawers. Any reaction to these events are simply the product of societal conditioning you’d obviously be so much better off without. Smelling offensively to others, or leaving your various residues on furniture belonging to others, hey, those are clearly value judgments of dubious value.
The great part is that if you think crapping in your pants is no better than crapping outside your pants, think of what a great president you could think we have!
What’s indeed interesting about this IMO is how the peer pressure (or maybe it’s the pressure to get a good grade in Prof Fahs’ bodily function festival class) can actually cause people of otherwise common sense to forego same. It’s true of smoking, as an obvious example; an activity most people are revulsed by the first time or three they try it; but there, there is this pressure or impetus to be “cool”.
Walking around with a turd in your pants, though, that’s an exciting new frontier in societal development.
Forward!
She could be used to block up a Volcano
Bravo!
“I think the cashier thought I was a bit weird.”
LOO, what a perfect story for this thread! You could have been mistaken for a “menstrual activist”.
I have heard tell of these nutcases.
One thing we do know about walking around with crap in your pants .... if you’re also wearing an underwear bomb, it might not work so well.
As have I, but I’m trying to repress the memories.
Bloody ‘ell, ye say!
Memory seems to recall a medical issue some poor sap had after using one of the “do it yourself” tampon ideas this group touted.
If you throw up on yourself (maybe after reading this article) should you walk around covered in vomit too?
If this woman wants to strike a blow for menstrual activism, why doesn’t she go on strike and menstruate every day of the month? If she has the courage of her convictions, that should be no problem right? I’m sure the patriarchy was responsible for limiting it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.