Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman is thrown out of Paris opera after cast refused to perform unless she removed Muslim veil
Daily Mail ^ | 20OCT2014 | Peter Allen

Posted on 10/22/2014 7:23:59 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine

France's Socialist government today pledged to toughen up its anti face-covering law after a veiled Muslim woman was ejected from a major Paris opera house. In an incident which has divided opinion in the city's liberal arts community, cast members performing La Traviata 'objected strongly' to the presence of a woman in the audience wearing a niqab-type veil.

'A singer spotted her in the front row during the second act,' said Jean-Philippe Thiellay, director of the Bastille Opera, which was opened by Socialist president Francois Mitterand in 1989.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ejected; muslim; woman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2014 7:23:59 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

GOOD. Shoulda stopped her at the front door to begin with.


2 posted on 10/22/2014 7:27:05 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Minorities should take notes. The more socialism the less friendly it is for its tools.


3 posted on 10/22/2014 7:27:43 AM PDT by wetphoenix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

The french these days have more stones than Americans do, apparently.


4 posted on 10/22/2014 7:28:20 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Looks like the French are growing a pair.


5 posted on 10/22/2014 7:28:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Seems French “artists” are not all brain-dead multi-culti leftists as they are in the USA.


6 posted on 10/22/2014 7:36:34 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

No more French white flags???

Sacrebleu!!!

Zut alors!!!

Mon Dieu!!!

Bon sang!!!

Oh la vache!!!

Merde alors!!!

ça me soûle!!!


7 posted on 10/22/2014 7:41:26 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
I may be the odd man out here, but I think a law that says what style of clothing you can wear as you go about your private life is rather draconian.

I am not talking about professional activities, where for health and safety reasons there might be compelling arguments for clothing restrictions.

It appears this person was simply attending a theatrical performance. Of what concern is it to others in the theatre, unless she was wearing an enormous hat that blocked the view of patrons behind her?
8 posted on 10/22/2014 7:45:20 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (My wife told me to update my tag, so I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

OTOH, if thousands of women showed up at a Jets game with their faces covered..who could blame them?


9 posted on 10/22/2014 7:45:39 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace
I may be the odd man out here, but I think a law that says what style of clothing you can wear as you go about your private life is rather draconian.

I totally agree. It's overtly Tyrannical.

10 posted on 10/22/2014 7:49:55 AM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace

She (if it was a she) could blow herself up, start shooting the crowd with that gun she’s carrying, or do some other form of jihad without anyone being able to give a good description of her or the cameras getting a good pic of her.

Maybe everyone should start dressing up as ninjas in France as well as America?


11 posted on 10/22/2014 7:52:04 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace
"I may be the odd man out here, but I think a law that says what style of clothing you can wear as you go about your private life is rather draconian."


12 posted on 10/22/2014 7:53:30 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN; Rebel_Ace

People who cover their face are hiding SOMEONE’S imho...and subject to distrust


13 posted on 10/22/2014 7:56:51 AM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

I once saw Katherine Hepburn onstage in a Seattle theatre...she STOPPED the play to admonish someone in the audience who was taking photos...


14 posted on 10/22/2014 7:58:42 AM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Now it’s cell phone users


15 posted on 10/22/2014 7:59:38 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine; DannyTN
On its face, the argument that she could "blow herself up" seems specious, unless the bomb was wrapped around her head, and she needed a veil to hide it.

The "fat guy" in row 8 could really be a "skinny guy" with a belt bomb around his waist, even if he does not have a veil. Add to that the fact that someone willing to blow themselves up is probably not too concerned about being identified after the fact.

Large sunglasses, broad brimmed hats, generous, flowing scarves, ski masks, goggles, gaudy make-up and sweat shirt "hoodies" can all interfere with "Facial Identification Systems". Shall we ban those too?

How about all citizens are required to face forward, remove all head gear and salute to any visibly placed surveillance camera?
16 posted on 10/22/2014 8:04:21 AM PDT by Rebel_Ace (My wife told me to update my tag, so I did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Wearing of the niqab face veil is wearing gang colors. Period.

The niqab is a hostile statement to those not Muslim. Period.

The niqab conceals identity & possible terroristic intent. Period.

Islam’s ultimate goal is to take over the world & kill all those whom it deems to be “infidels”. Period.


17 posted on 10/22/2014 8:11:32 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("I am a radicalized infidel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I was just about to post the exact same thing.

Great minds ...


18 posted on 10/22/2014 8:13:59 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace

You obviously don’t know anything about Islam.


19 posted on 10/22/2014 8:22:05 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Surprising, but it turned out the right way.
In the USA, she would have sued and the opera company would have apologized and groveled, and the staff sent to “reeducation” camp.


20 posted on 10/22/2014 8:22:39 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson