Will Turning Seawater Into Drinking Water Help Drought-Hit California?

npr ^

[BenLurkin]

Last week, Governor Jerry Brown made water conservation mandatory in the drought-stricken state of California. "As Californians, we have to pull together and save water in every way we can," he said.

Morning traffic makes its way toward downtown Los Angeles along the Hollywood Freeway, past an electronic sign warning of severe drought. California Gov. Jerry Brown introduced the state's first mandatory water reduction measure this week.

But if the four-year drought continues, conservation alone — at least what's required by the governor's plan — won't fix the problem.

Across California, communities are examining all options to avoid running out of water. Some, like the coastal city of Santa Barbara, are looking to the past for inspiration.

This may be the most severe drought in recorded history in California, but it's not the longest. The last big drought started in the late 1980s and lasted seven years.

Sheila Lodge was Santa Barbara's mayor back then. "You don't know with a drought if you're in one until a few years have gone by and, 'Oh! You know, this is really serious!' " she tells NPR's Arun Rath.

To cope with the drought, Santa Barbara's city council banned watering lawns and hired water police to enforce restrictions. Some residents painted their brown lawns green.

"In the meanwhile," Lodge recalls, "we had to do something to find other water supplies."

California's long-term drought has significantly dropped the water level at Lake Perris in Southern California. According to local fishermen, all of this sand used to be covered in water.

City officials considered and rejected various options, including trucking water down from Canada — it was too expensive. One proposal envisioned dragging an iceberg all the way down the coast from Alaska. "Somehow," Lodge says, "nobody was ever able to tell us how they would get the melting water from the iceberg into the water system."

In the end, they decided to build a desalination facility to turn seawater into drinking water. But just as the $35 million desalination plant was nearing completion in 1991, heavy rains known as the "March Miracle" made it unnecessary.

"We had over 30 inches of rain in one month," says Lodge, "and 30 inches is twice as much as we get in a whole year, normally. And we were on our way to being safe."

By the time the city's Charles E. Meyer Desalination Facility was ready to come online in 1992, the drought was over. The facility ran for six weeks, just to make sure it worked. Then it was shut down. The city mostly forgot about it.

Until now.

Santa Barbara is reopening the plant and Joshua Haggmark, the city's water resources manager, is in charge of getting it back online. Much work lies ahead.

Entering the control room and seeing its big computers with tiny memories — and floppy disk drives — feels like stepping back in time to 1992. This is "about as sophisticated as it gets for this old facility," says Haggmark.

The intake, where ocean water first enters the desalination system, is about half a mile off the beach. Once it gets to the plant, the water flows through gravel and sand filters and finally, when all the debris is gone, into the reverse osmosis membranes — salt removers.

Two gallons of ocean water go in; one gallon of drinking water comes out. The leftover gallon contains super-salty brine. This doubly salty water is mixed with the city's wastewater and then piped back out to sea and spread around, about 30 miles offshore.

Joshua Haggmark, Santa Barbara's water resources manager, is in charge of getting the city's desalination plant back online.

That briny waste is one of many concerns raised by environmentalists and other critics of desalination plants like this one and others that are being planned and built along the California coast. "The biggest concern about desalination is that it is expensive, it's energy-intensive and it has a lot of side effects — a lot of unintended consequences to marine life both from the intake and the discharge," says Marco Gonzalez, the executive director of the Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation.

Right now, the sources of electricity available to run desalination plants are not environmentally friendly. "Really, it's going to require us to find alternative energy sources to power these plants. So as we put more renewables online, it will become more environmentally friendly and more cost-effective," says Gonzalez.

Cost effectiveness is important, because desalination is expensive. To get the Santa Barbara plant back online, the estimated cost of water for the average resident will increase by about $20 each month starting this July, even though the plant won't open until 2016.

Gonzalez says that before money goes into desalination projects that may hurt the environment, water conservation needs to become a bigger priority. "The first thing I say to someone who says that we need to do desal[ination] now is, 'Turn off your sprinklers.' We don't even know how much we need because we waste so much; we live in a total artificial world of water use and water supply."

"We don't even know how much we need because we waste so much; we live in a total artificial world of water use and water supply."

But others insist that conserving water will not be enough. The drought is too severe, they say, and the state has been using too much water for too long.

"I don't think we can really conserve our way out of this problem, this problem being a combination of drought and of incredibly high water demand by a growing population and climate change," says Jay Famiglietti, the senior water scientist at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology.

Almost everyone agrees: for a drought this severe, you need a multifaceted approach.

A sign over a highway in Glendale, Calif., warned motorists in February to save water in response to the state's severe drought. But a study released earlier this week showed residents in the southern coastal part of the state used more water this spring than they did last year.

"Desal[ination] is part of it and sewage recycling is part of it," Famiglietti says. "More efficient irrigation, better water pricing, better crop choices — there's all sorts of things we need to include in our portfolio to bridge that gap between supply and demand."

But here's what scares a lot of people: Even an all-of-the-above strategy isn't going to be enough.

Even after factoring in the water that the desalination plant is expected to produce, plus recycled water and what's called "extraordinary conservation," Santa Barbara is projecting a significant water shortfall in 2017.

Haggmark says the city hopes to be able to buy water to make up the shortfall — but with other thirsty buyers in the region, finding an affordable source could be a problem.

[SkyDancer]

A desalinater the size of Arizona....

[iowacornman]

Demonrats don’t want to solve the problem. They want to control people and get their money. Any one stupid enough to live is the state is overwhelmingly deserving of their capture by communist leadership.

[Truth29]

Gee, that growing population has a lot of illegals in it. Maybe they ought to do something about that.

[biggredd1]

deport about 7 million scumbags and there will be an excess of drinking water.

[Mrs. Don-o]

The Israelis are just now ramping up the world’s largest seawater desalination plant to full capacity.

Their newest plant (Sorek) is producing 627,000 cubic meters of water daily. By 2016, when additional plants will be running, some 50 percent of the country’s water is expected to come from desalination. And check out the price: They're producing it for 58 U.S. cents per cubic meter (1,000 liters, or about what one person in Israel uses per week). It only cost $500 million, which came from private investment, and will be recouped in something like 5 years. California could have done that years ago. But no.

Instead, California authorized the issuance of US $9.95 billion in bonds for the High Speed Rail project which is never going to pay for itself. They could have built 18 major water-desalinization plants for that.

Geez, we should give California to Israel.

[rottndog]

Desal plants integrated with all electric power plants that use seawater for cooling....take the discharged hot seawater from the steam condensers and run it to the desal plant, requiring much less energy to distill pure water from the salt water. Then you are killing 2 utility birds with one stone.

[Kartographer]

This is California we are talking about so can’t everyone just use their EBT and buy Perrier?

[Fungi]

Bingo! Best post in this thread. A thread on desalinization plants in Israel was posted earlier. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3276014/posts

[Mastador1]

Will Turning Seawater Into Drinking Water Help Drought-Hit California?

Gee, I don't know. Can I have ask Israel for $500 Alex?

[ansel12]

See post 12.

[umgud]

Right now, the sources of electricity available to run desalination plants are not environmentally friendly.

About to die of thirst and they're more worried about globull warming.

[Ingtar]

The Arab states allow the consumption of fossil fuels to support the process. California does not, and leeches from the power grid.

[Fungi]

“globull” Saw that. True.

[Nifster]

Did my senior project (forty years ago no less) on a water de-sal plant and its scalability for use along the California coast....The drought then had us with bricks in the toilet tank and other water saving measures. The one thing that California did NOT do (because of all the crazy enviro niuts) was build more dams. They will never learn

[Jane Long]

BTTT!

CA is going to force suffering (taxes/fees/cuts) upon their citizens until the USGov comes in to bail them out :(

[BwanaNdege]

Haven’t the Arab states been doing this for years?

Californians are too busy with Environmental & Diversity problems to take care of a Basic Needs problem they have been aware of for a century or more. Meanwhile, developing countries (with a bit of help from Western engineers and, perhaps, Western money) are addressing the problem.

In 2004, Mrs BN & I were helping at a medical clinic in the slums of Santo Domingo, DR. Every day or so a tiny cabover pickup with a 100 gallon or so stainless steel tank in the back would come by, selling water at $0.05 per 5 gallon jerry can.

The source? A desalination plant on a barge in Santo Domingo, IIRC!

[Fungi]

Hey, it’s NPR, their motto being “all things considered,” or better stated: only what we think you should believe. Truth, objective news? We are NPR, we are above that.

[Scrambler Bob]

This is California we are talking about so can’t everyone just use their EBT and buy Perrier? —

Your idea is great.

Dump that Perrier in the bay, for the Delta Smelt.

Then the farmers can get some water.

Or use desal water for the smelt. Then their population can grow, and vote Dem.

[Carry_Okie]

There is no shortage of drinking water. The shortage is for irrigation.

[Sherman Logan]

A small amount of research, on a topic in which I’m not at all expert, seems to indicate about 3kwh per cubic meter to desalinate water.

That means roughly 2 megawatts of power to run the Sorek plant. Unless I’ve missed something, which is quite possible.