Posted on 05/05/2015 4:06:54 PM PDT by Kaslin
What do you mean "if"?
Here are the instructions on how to hold American fascist judges accountable for their crimes:
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Alstoetter.htm
Paging ValJar’s father. Your presence is required for a Stoning/Honor Killing at dawn.
If they do, you would not want to be in their shoes.
I agree!
The supreme court can repeal the law of gravity, but people can still fall down the stairs. Likewise, they can redefine marriage, but it is not possible for two men nor two women to marry.
Being a good Muslim, Valerie of course means "the moral universe" as is defined by Islamic teachings.
Which, of course, do not include allowing homosexuals to live.
So, for all the gays and lesbians listening in, why, exactly, do you think Valerie is so happy about the progress of what you call "gay rights"?
One way or the other, you'll be tested on your answer.
Pitchforks, torches, and shovels?
Constitutional Amendment? Would take years.
What would this slumlord-racist know about morals, other than rotten ones?
There won’t be any ‘what if’ about it...They are now spending their time trying to figure out how to justify their decision to the American people...
If the Supremes rule in favor of gay “marriage”, that will mean the same thing as their ruling in favor of abortion. States will have to tolerate it, but it will be no more moral than it is now. Such a ruling will also stop all debate cold, and no progress toward a real solution will be made ever again. I suspect the few sensible liberals in the world don’t want that. Sadly, none of the Court liberals have even a shred of common sense.
This is Caesar’s tribunal, composed of Caesar’s minions, who will no doubt do Caesar’s bidding. Take away the pomp, the circumstance, and the theatrics and you have 9 political hacks in black muumuus. They don’t represent me, and do not have anything even resembling moral authority.
If it goes through, some conservative churches will no longer perform any wedding ceremonies in the building. They will perform a “blessing” of REAL marriages (one man, one woman) in the church after the wedding.
“I’m in favor of dropping that word as a synonym for ‘judge’.”
I agree. How ‘bout Leper? As in Chief Leper Roberts, and associate Leper Keenedy. Or would that be a grave insult to fine and upstanding lepers?
That makes perfect sense.
There are churches that have lost their BUILDINGS due to disagreements with certain denominational hierarchies over the “gay” “marriage” thing already.
I know of one that left her former denomination lost its building..and just recently bought a “replacement”.
No “gay “marriages” there!!
Well said.
I know there is a contingent of well-known pastors who have already signed a petition and letter, stating that regardless of the outcome of their decision, their allegiance is to God’s Word. If the SCOTUS removes traditional marriage, they will NOT perform same-sex marriages under any circumstances, as to do so would be blasphemous and against God’s laws. I would hope that MANY others would join them, if push comes to shove.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.