The battle for religion is just beginning.
Interposition, there is nothing to nullify.
“... but then claim their actions won’t lead to the government recognition of polygamy and other conceptions of “marriage...”
Nothing ever works out like liberals claim.
Like, “If you like your doctor...”
“Healthcare costs will decrease $2,500.”
Why will this be any different?
Similar to the judge in California, the fix was in with the gay mafia and Kagan: she makes Ani DiFranco look like Phyllis Schlafly.
Decades ago.
Time for stiff-necked Christians to get off their fat a$$e$ and vote for the best candidate possible. Stiff-necked Christians couldn’t vote for Romney, because he didn’t hold his mouth just right when he prayed to the Lord. So, they stayed home with their precious votes and allowed muslims VJ and Obama to transform our nation.
Anyone care to guess the outcome of the next Second Amendment case in SCOTUS will be?
The Congress can impeach a supreme court member for lack of “good behavior”. Why haven’t they???
If Congress believes the court is acting politically, they can impeach those members that are.
Why haven’t they??
You’ll never read it in the American media but I’d be willing to bet that the USA has become a big joke to the rest of the world.
Our government - executive, legislative, and judicial - has become completely corrupt and ineffective. They wipe their collective arses with the Constitution. Their sole interest is to take care of each other and to hell with the citizens.
If nullification and civil disobedience are ineffective in restraining this abominable government we will soon discover the true intent of the Second Amendment (and you can be sure they will be coming for that next).
Does it also go for tax laws, gun rights or any other right granted in the Constitution that the commies want to take away from law biding citizens.
Liberals turning the Constitution back onto the Constitution wavers ?
Just got off the phone with my wife. She is visiting the grand kids. Their father is a Southern Baptist pastor who is concerned about how to respond to request to perform queer marriages. I told her to tell him to respond thusly,”I would be happy to officiate but in the interest of celebrating diversity the ceremony should be held in a mosque. Let me know when you have found one.”
Too bad we don’t have someone with the gall of Andrew Jackson who could say..”The SCOTUS has made it’s decision. Now let them enforce it!”
Yes I know it was a bad deal for the Cherokees and other tribes, but it would be appropriate today.
Nullification is the right answer. Courageous leadership then is the essential ingredient.
That ingredient might be lacking.
Oh please. Ain’t gonna happen. In this and the ACA ruling the Corporations got what the Corporations wanted. Anything else is just Bread & Circuses.
We were sold and bought LONG ago.
The Extreme Supremes.
The article is good, but it missed the nullification at the lowest and most important levels...those of the family and individual. You are in no way obligated to respect the license issuance process, or to obtain a license. You do not need a license to be married in a church. And why would you want the license anyway? If things go south, guess what? You’re in caesars “family” courts.
Let caesar define his twisted sense of marriage however he pleases. You have no legal and certainly no moral obligation to go along.
There is a reason for the 10th Ammendment.
The Constitution says whatever the Hell 5 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices say it says. Replace 1 or 2 Justices and the Constitution can say something else entirely.
If we can elect a conservative President who will replace a couple of the 80 year old far left-wing liberals on the Court then a different majority of 5 Justices can reverse every far left-wing Supreme Court decree from the past 50 years.
On the other hand, if Hillary is elected and replaces Scalia (an 80 year old conservative) and Kennedy (an 80 year old sometimes moderate sometimes liberal) then say goodbye to the Second Amendment, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, private property rights, and every other freedom that has been hanging by a 5 to 4 thread. Far left-wing liberals will be legislating from the bench for the next 30 years.
WHY I HAVE AN ILLUMINATED CROSS AS A PROTEST
Why are those so called democrats which belong to a democrat in name only ever being called out on their core beliefs ? Nooo that wouldn’t be bi-partisan ! Ask any of those so called GOPES (Government Over the People Elite Statists) campaign advisors about depressing the “democrat” vote and you get a lecture.Democrat core beliefs showed up with booing the mention of God in 2012 which made it official. They’ve declared a war on religion particularly Christianity.Which I for one now have an illumiuated crucifix at night in my front yard facing the street (Highway) as a statement. And encourage others do as well
A DEMOCRAT apparently doesn’t believe there’s such a thing as the Ten Commandments or sin because everything that leaves their mouths is a lie. But I have yet to hear a Republican candidate even suggest even in jest mention why “democrat” lying is part of their core belief ? Never mind the use of their positions promoting clony capitalism campaign contributers financing alternate energy plans spending billions which went belly up at our expense while leaving our infastructure was falling apart......
Why ? Because it isn’t being bi-partisan or lets not forget the other trap politically correct.
This is a great piece. First thing I did as soon as the decision was handed down was to email my three County Commissioners and urge them to “Refuse and Resist.”
(By noon, my county was issuing faux licenses.)
My state’s Republican governor, Haslam, fell all over himself with his immediate direction to immediately comply - and so they did.
I have not heard back from them, or my State Rep who I also contacted. But, they will hear from me.
We are in the last ditch.