Posted on 10/04/2015 12:24:12 PM PDT by ScottWalkerForPresident2016
Qaddafi's latest gambit: Convince the European public that they really want him to stick around, with all the stability that entails.
"There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean."
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
The Libya debacle is completely on Hillary...
MSM is completely silent on this...
“We came, we saw, he died” cackle cackle
Stupid witch!!
I never saw a reason for this that made any sense. Does anyone?
Europe is flooded with millions of illiterate, unskilled radicals... what could possibly go wrong?
Eastern Europe will remain strong it seems. The Poles, Slovaks and Hungarians want no part of this mess.
It’s as if the liberals and Merkel have suddenly achieved what centuries of Ottoman sultans failed to accomplish... the invasion of Europe is underway.
He kept his country stable. He knew what would happen.
The only reason Odumbass helped him to get removed was to let the Muslim Brotherhood take over, under the disguise of some magical (and farcical) “Arab Spring”
Another prediction in there:
“These armed terrorists in Benghazi, including members of al Qaeda... What we need is to get rid of these armed gangs.” [Qaddafi said]
From March 7, 2011.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
how terribly prophetic!
That’s the flashback, here’s the flashpresent:
Middle East would be more stable if Saddam, Gaddafi still in power: Trump
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3344574/posts
He knows the devastating effect that would have.
Apache Oil, just before the "Arab Spring" destabilization began, made gigantic discoveries of oil in the western part of Egypt. Egypt wanted to control the find, and Libya controlled the nearest port, Benghazi. So, what's the answer? Overthrow the strong nationalistic governments using local unrest, then fill in leaders the US/EU/NATO would control Only problem is the people who did the overthrowing weren't about to let the west take control, so they became not just trained and armed, but angry and dangerous.
Then there's Qaddafi's billions that were (and are, I think) sitting in Italian banks. He was threatening to pull out that money, which would've meant a total meltdown for the Italian banking system.
It's all conspiracy theory, for sure. But it makes some sense.
He was right
Qaddafi knew what kind of Muzzie savages he was dealing with.
Unfortunately Obama and Hillary thought they knew better.
Part of the liberal mental disorder, arrogant know-it-allism.
Pray the WORLD is waking up to Team 0dungo!
0dungo Hillary knew EXACTLY what they were doing when opened the flood gates of the Caliphate. They did the same thing in the U.S., using a different army.
I think he was just truthfully warning of what would happen as the secular dictators of the mideast were removed.
I think they naively believed they were ushering in an Arab Spring by destroying Qaddafi, but you could well be right.
the issue is not that the invaders are one race or another
the issue is that most of them are one (so-called) religion
which preaches hatred of Christians and Jews and others
and also teaches its adherents to infiltrate, terrorize, take over and then subjugate/murder the rest of us
that’s exactly what they’re doing now to Europe and USA...
and that’s what they did (successfully) to take over 57 countries around the globe
nothing new, those who refuse to laern (and take the necessary defensive measures) from history.... will simply be condemned to repeat it
is all
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.