Posted on 11/02/2015 5:06:32 PM PST by Hojczyk
I’m sorry......but SERIOUSLY!!!!!!
Cruz outburst was a very good outburst.....kudos.....
BUT.....to atttribute Trump’s courageous lead .....to Cruz?????
seriously?
I’m sorry. I wasn’t clear. I was talking about Carson.
I think Trump already has enough voters signed up.
No other candidate in this crowded field has the leadership skills that Trump has. Iâm sorry if that steps on toes, but truth is truth.
Thanks for clearing that up. I didn’t realize Carson wasn’t on the ballot in Virginia.
Carson made some brief speech at a prayer breakfast and all of a sudden some people were saying he should run for president. It reminds me of Paul Ryan making some strong comments concerning a budget in front of Obama. Both were put on the political map by short videos. I don’t believe either video would make one a great Speaker or president.
Sorry. I got all my posts confused. I’m trying to work and post at the same time. Probably not a good idea.
This probably means that he already has a deal in place with an unnamed party. Now he’s offering the deal to others. If he pulls this off, it will demonstrate, by example, what he can do as President. At the very least it keeps him in the headlines.
Think of it as a double team.
Cruz brought up the issue at the debate.
Trump will use his skill set to nail the details.
So yes, I am serious.
It is deplorable, but it can be salvaged, and quickly.
Trump has been in this thing only a little over a 100 days, and look how the landscape has already been turned.
The right man can turn the country too, especially one who has stated he is going to work long and hard as President.
Goodness this man gets it! If we don’t elect him as President, we don’t deserve a great United States of America!
I believe he qualified for the Virginia ballot a few days ago.
So what! He could totally fund his campaign with his book. Brilliant!
Democrats can do the same...of course not many democrats watch debates - there's the few white liberal elites (the group propped up by the ‘victim groups’) some dependent women - a few union bosses and a small number of blacks and Hispanics.
Hillary's big meetings are filled with old white people bused in from local retirement centers... and some high school kids teacher's unions push to stand behind her. It's ‘astroturf-lite’...None of those groups are going to show up to watch a debate in person or on TV..
Who would have access? Who would do a complete vetting?
That is the “ask”. It’s a negotiation. So, ultimately maybe something goes to charity. The network will have no ratings without Trump. Moreover, he’ll probably tell them that he’ll do some televised event in the same time slot, or one close to it, that will assure that the network gets no ratings.
Assembling a Make America Great Again pinglist for FRiends of Trump. There is power in numbers, in discussing his positions, in networking and even in organizing local events as time goes on.
If you've been pinged, you're already on and need to do nothing. Let's add FRiends of Trump by word-of-ping and try to avoid disrupters on the list.
To be dropped from, or added to, this pinglist, freepmail Albion Wilde.
Posted between 3:30 PM and 10:00 PM, 11/2/15:
DONALD TRUMPâS BOLD NEGOTIATING PLOY FOR GOP DEBATE
Donald Trump unloaded on Marco Rubio in a new interview â here's a list of his insults
Build a wall on the border? No thanks, says San Diego. (Darrell Issa too.)
NBC/WSJ Poll: Carson Surges Into Lead of National GOP Race
Trump: U.S. "needs the Tom Brady of negotiators"
Florida poll: Trump leads (27%), with Jeb's help: Bush holding Rubio back
New Hampshire post-debate poll: Trump leads with 26%, Rubioâs support triples since September
PPP IA: Trump back in the lead, 22-21 over Carson, Cruz 14, Rubio 10
Iowa Polling Results - Trump 29.4% Carson 22.4%
Cruz rising in Iowa; Clinton back out to dominant lead (PPP) [Trump 22%, Carson 21%, Cruz 14%]
Breaking: Trump is breaking with other candidates to negotiate with networks directly.
Trump campaign to negotiate directly with TV networks on debate formats
The Story Behind Why CNBC Was Scolded at the First Question in Third Debate
Why not let the networks simply keep their own profits from the debate? Profits aren't evil. In fact they serve a purpose.
When one limits profit, one also limits debate. It doesn't encourage debate.
You will have less debates.
what you said!
The Profits from Trump’s Books go to Charity.
Trump was on record at least a month ago about donating proceeds of the debates to charity. Recall? He made news suggesting it to CNN.
And that’s the first I’d ever heard the idea anyplace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.