Posted on 11/03/2015 8:43:24 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
Children should be seen and not heard - particularly for ones with political aspirations.
She can always “self identify” as a natural born American.
children are used by liberals to push their issues.
Reminds me a bit, of the 12 year old girl who spoke at the Democrat convention in 2004. She chastised Dick Cheney for saying a very bad word. The crowd chortled in glee at her scolding Dick Cheney. A 12 year old of all people was calling out Dick Cheney for saying the F word to someone.
Ask Obama, with his pad of executive orders, he can fix that constitutional problem, no sweat.
I was into politics at 11. I still haven’t learned to shut up. ;)
Sucks for the girl, but she obviously isn’t enough of an American if she doesn’t understand the reasons we have such limitations.
“the Constitution forbids her from becoming President. She doesn’t accept that “
Well. where did she get this attitude? I;m sure it wasn’t some idiot who reads from a teleprompter and thinks there are 57 states...
She’s 10. She doesn’t have enough maturity, life experience, understanding of history to have an opinion on this.
Children don’t have the judgement to make decisions on major political issues.
You took the words right out of my mouth, max.
Like that stops a liberal.
Bye, Chelsea.
No we shouldn't. Now get back to work, and try to keep the crayon inside the lines.
Sorry Sweetie....
By the time you’re 35 America will be a full blown fascist dictatorship....
“Sheâs 10. She doesnât have enough maturity, life experience, understanding of history to have an opinion on this.”
Of course not. She comes from the position of a child being denied a treat and complaining because she cannot get what she wants. Her parents obviously haven’t clued her in. I’m not sure why children can have the right to address the government in any case. The whole thing is ludicrous.
**Comrade.
Well sh*t! Let’s change the Constitution right now because a 10 year old from China wants to be president.
By his actions, The Kenyan has declared it null and void.
The Supreme Court will note there has already been a precedent, and hence she should have no problem.
Why not? We change the law for mentally ill people and depraved murderers. Why not a child? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.