Posted on 01/18/2016 6:23:12 PM PST by Isara
Four days since the debate and everyone is still talking about non-issues like Ted Cruz’s citizenship, his loan filing error, and “New York values.”
Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin advises conservatives not to get dragged into the media’s games or campaign squabbles, because he knows “if we do not nominate a solid conservative, we’re going to lose our country.”
He reminds the American people that this election is about them—not about Donald Trump, or Marco Rubio, or Ted Cruz, and goes on to ask—especially those furthering the “stupid talk”—a very serious and humbling question:
“Do we want to save the country or not?"
Listen to the full segment here:
Levin: "I'm Sick and Tired of Stupid Talk!" (Audio)
Levin reminded listener to not forget who the real enemy is: The Democratic Party represented by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Sen. Ted Cruz was once unanimously considered a hero of conservatism, a fighter against the Establishment, only now to have his words twisted and to be cast as a foe.
Levin believes the American people don’t have to be dragged into such stupidity.
Those comments will not soon be forgotten, esp. when those “stupid” conservatives are needed come October-November 2016...
Yes, I think so..
There’s no question . It’s Fact and you can’t refute it .
Seems to me has been doing that, save for bringing Obama into it. I have never read or heard either Levin or Cruz ever say "nothing to see here, move along."
Those words were coined by critics, and likely critics that are here on the forum.
How dare Mark speak ill about the new king trump. Listen to all the trumpets crying like liberals because he dares to see that Trump is naked.
How many people here, before Trump switched to being a “Conservtive” thought Cruz was the best person? Now we have Trump, all swagger and bluff, talking like he knows whats going on and the people here swoon like the dems did for Obama. FR has become a Trump love fest. either people are too stupid or too blind to see that Trump is a ill mannered lout who never had to do anything but live off his old mans cash.
What’s a fact?
Let me tell you how I think happened when they tried to view and talk with the kids...and there were kids...
While they were en route, there was a report that they (govt agents) had turned away a congressman and his delegation, can’t recall who, and I think there were others.
What I think happened was that they could not gain access, which was the intent. I think they were left with only one course of action and that was to leave the stuff they brought and head back to the barn.
But this is conjecture based on some factual basis.
But to your erroneous point, the intent was to get into the compound and see what was what. it would have made a great story to wrap around Obama’s head, but they, (The feds) sealed up the facility to prevent just that.
BTW, While all this was going on, this place was percolating with Beck derangement syndrome.
I am guessing that you have never gotten over your case of it.
I did..
(What a sincere, genuine, straight-from-the-heart kind of guy, eh?)
(Kind of reminds me of this old guy. Remember him?)
Haha exactly ... when people see that video, they no longer support Teddy ... very weird
Why don't you ping him and ask him directly?
If Cruz gets through the primaries, the issue will be seen as purely political.
Lord you’re right, I haven’t listened to him in several months!
I’m going by what’s been posted on FR by people I know are nutcase Trump haters.
It’s not fair to him to judge Mark by what those nuts say.
I’ll make a point of catching a show soon.
Seems that disinformation is coming from everywhere. I am not a conspiracy nutcase, but someone has to be sowing the seeds of insanity.
Mark is a solid and smart conservative. He was critical of candidates when they used inane criticism of the liberal kind to cut their opponents down to side. Trump did this once and mark, as he has done for others, criticized it.
That started a crap storm that has yet to abate. And it came from Trump supporters.
Mark has made it clear many times what he was critical of, and that he liked Trump.
Today again he said he would vote for him in the general.
But nothing will stop the criticism of Mark Levin.
A big plus one,,, I dont even recognize this place anymore.
I believe Cruz would be a much better President but the Donald might have a better chance of winning. Trump truly is a loose cannon though, I dont trust him or his newly found convictions, especially after the sleezy attacks against Cruz.
Compare Trumps apparent flipflopping with the stuff that caused Romney to lose the election.
Trumps are newer (maximum 16 years) and he was actually a democrat.
It was not that long ago. We learned that pragmatism did not win elections, did we not?
This has to be all about immigration, but the two candidates views are no far apart or nearly identical, but cruz’s work in this area goes back a lot longer. he’s totally solid.
It’s a mystery to me..reminds me of social media activity with flash mobs.
I dunno....I may need to take some time off..
It was the great one’s criticizing Trump without criticizing Cruz’s “NY values” meme that made me think he’d jumped the shark.
The “NY values” meme is very nuanced: RINOs, NE Liberal media. It had to be played with a light hand.
But, as I said, I haven’t heard ‘the horse’s mouth’.
The Constitution leaves no room for doubt upon this subject. The words "natural-born citizen of the United States" occur in it, and the other provision also occurs in it that "Congress shall have power to pass a uniform system of naturalization." To naturalize a person is to admit him to citizenship. Who are natural-born citizens but those born within the Republic? Those born within the Republic, whether black or white, are citizens by birth -- natural-born citizens. There is not such word as white in your Constitution. Citizenship, therefore, does not depend upon complexion any more than it depends upon the rights of election or of office. All from other lands, who, by the terms of your laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural-born citizens. Gentlemen can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution in relation to Indians. The reason why that exception was made in the Constitution is apparent to everybody. The several Indian tribes were recognized at the organization of this Government as independent sovereignties. They were treated with as such; and they have been dealt with by the Government ever since as separate sovereignties. Therefore, they were excluded from the general rule.
Hon. John A. Bingham
The Congressional Globe April 11th, 1862, page 1639
So am I (sick and tired of stupid talk)!! This is quarreling over such minor things.. there is no substantive things being learned about what the candidates aim to do. I have tuned them out.. I’m no longer interested in listening to the kids fuss. IT’s boring and a waste of time... The more they fuss, the less respect I have for them.. and doubt they are who I thought they were a couple months ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.