Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud
Townhall.com ^ | November 11th, 2012 | Rachel Alexander

Posted on 04/24/2016 10:23:19 AM PDT by ChessExpert

So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; 2010election; 2012election; 2014election; 2016election; election2008; election2010; election2012; election2014; election2016; electionfraud; elections; fraud; obama; obamaelectionfraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: Bubba Gump Shrimp

What GOP politician has ever really called any dem out for voter fraud? My point is that if they do it nobody in politics really seems to care I guess, least of all the folks that supposedly are the ones that get robbed.

Freegards


61 posted on 04/24/2016 12:14:26 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Ummm no. The historical model all say America love incumbents, even when they suck, and Romney was never close. If there was fraud they would have accidentally turned it into a Reaganesque landslide.


62 posted on 04/24/2016 12:17:56 PM PDT by discostu (This unit not labeled for individual sale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
He's how the democrats do voter fraud: The round up inner city black women (men usually can't vote due to felonies) and then bus them from polling place to polling place. The poll workers sign them in as someone who hasn't voted yet and they vote under their name. They then bus them to the next location and repeat. At the end of the day they thrown food and booze party as repayment. Fun is had by all.

This goes on in every heavily black voting area and the republicans don't say jack about it because “racist”.

One of things I'm looking forward to is Trump sending in camera crews and security to film these report voters. Trump won't have a problem calling out the Dems for it.

63 posted on 04/24/2016 12:18:53 PM PDT by RedWulf ((Trump supporter))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KyCats

I have ALWAYS thought that Obama won fraudulently. . .probably twice.


64 posted on 04/24/2016 12:20:19 PM PDT by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Ridiculous --
I Cheated BOTH Times.
Death to America!"


65 posted on 04/24/2016 12:23:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Without election fraud Democrats would never win any elections. That’s why they don’t like voter ID.

‘’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’
Without a doubt.


66 posted on 04/24/2016 12:27:29 PM PDT by DefeatCorruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
In another video, O'Keefe's videographer tells a DNC staffer from Obama's Organizing for America that she intends to vote in both Texas and Florida. The staffer laughs and says, "It's cool." The staffer then prints out a voter registration form for the undercover videographer and advises her on what to do if she gets caught.

These are just the known instances of attempted voter fraud.

I don't think this author understands what was taking place here. I don't think that O'Keefe or his videographer were engaged in any actual attempt to commit voter fraud. I think that O'Keefe and the videographer were just pretending that the videographer intended to vote in both Texas and Florida. It seems unfair to accuse the videographer of any actual attempt to commit voter fraud.

67 posted on 04/24/2016 12:29:36 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Mitt Romney was a squish and everyone knew it.

Blame it on voter fraud if it makes you feel better, but the guy didn’t appeal to me and many other Conservatives.

I wound up voting for him, but I sure could identify with those who didn’t.

It was another cluster “f” election.


68 posted on 04/24/2016 12:47:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

I agree. Obama won in 2012, because 3 million hard-core conservatives did not vote. I remember Michael Medved talking about this on the radio in December 2012 and a man called in from Utah, said he was a hard-core conservative and that he did not vote. I remember Medved’s complete confusion. Really? You did not vote for Romney? That man said, No!

A politicians in the future needs to be hard-core conservative times ten.
https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2014/09/17/obamas-catalist-database/


69 posted on 04/24/2016 1:34:03 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

And no one was presecuted


70 posted on 04/24/2016 1:59:55 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

No doubt that there was fraud, but it probably just padded Obama’s victory.

We just lost.


71 posted on 04/24/2016 2:03:44 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Even though Romney was a middle of the road candidate (at best), he WAS winning in all the polls and every campaign stop was packed. Whereas odumbo’s gatherings were weak and sparse.

I knew there was fraud. And yes, it will happen again if no one does anything. And I’m sure they won’t.

Soros OWNS the company that OWNS the voting machines.


72 posted on 04/24/2016 2:17:40 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I don’t think the communists give a hoot about Hitlery. They only care about their agenda. If they cared about actual people, they wouldn’t be communists and democrats.


73 posted on 04/24/2016 2:49:28 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

This is NOT accepted by the mainstream. But it is presented as if it were and discussed endlessly in the liberal media in order to brainwash people into thinking this is normal and they are out of step. Most people will fall for it eventually.

When you control the media and the message, it is not difficult to brainwash people. Communists are masters of brainwashing and controlling the language. One interesting historical example. Bolsheviks. “Bolshevik” means “majority” in Russian. They were nowhere near a majority, but choosing that for a name made it easier to convince people that they were and encourage them to jump on the bandwagon.


74 posted on 04/24/2016 2:53:10 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: randita

I don’t know if I hope you’re right or not. I still worry that Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, i.e., a democrat in republican clothing.

Saying what you will do is a LOT different than doing it. (0vomit promised to lower the oceans and put gas in everyone’s car. See any of that happening? Bush Sr. promised not to raise taxes. Etc., etc.)


75 posted on 04/24/2016 2:56:04 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

Seriously? Or is this missing a /sarc tag?

Even if I believed that not a single voter in some districts wanted to vote for Romney, I would be stunned to find out that they were all sufficiently literate to be capable of indicating this on their ballots. That the media buys into this is just more evidence of one or both of the following:
1. They are complicit in the fraud.
2. They are too stupid to understand psychology, human nature, probability, and are blind to the reality of what the illiteracy rate and IQ distributions are in many urban areas (most likely those with 0 R votes.)


76 posted on 04/24/2016 3:02:58 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: econjack

My father must be rolling over in his grave. All his life he voted Republican and now he’s voting Democrat.


77 posted on 04/24/2016 3:04:16 PM PDT by generally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

I always thought it was fraud.


78 posted on 04/24/2016 3:48:44 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

Everytime I think about Hillary’s being elected, I remember what was said by a famous Democrat: Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.


79 posted on 04/24/2016 3:49:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

every time


80 posted on 04/24/2016 3:50:43 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson