It is amazing that this is not all over the news with condemnation, picketing, and calls for stepping down.
Is America content with a crook for president? They don’t even know what’s going on. It’s not being reported to them.
Hopefully, Trump will find a way to let them know.
And lawyers wonder why they are despised...
The very first question out the mouths of the deposing attorney after that should have been, “Present us evidence of your license to practice law in this state, or the state in which you are claiming to represent her.”
Where is Cheryl licensed to practice law?
The ONLY think that hilLIARy learned from law school is how to skirt the law
guess all of Hillary’s future staff are going to be lawyers, down to the cleaning people
Corruption with a capital C. It amazes me how disgusting the media is to purposefully not report negative info about Hillary.
Cheryl has been pulling the “I’m Hilly’s lawyer & all is privileged” scheme for years & years & years ....
This is not Cheryl’s first “email rodeo” either. Here’s the 2013 kerfluffle over emails:
A Federal Judge Once Called Cheryl Mills’ Handling Of A Clinton Email Scandal ‘Loathsome’ And ‘Totally Inadequate’
If I am an attorney but not representing you and we stop at the bank that you go into and rob and I drive you away, knowing or not that you committed the crime, I am still aiding and abetting and I cannot imagine any court allowing you later to claim you are the robber’s attorney.
Of course, we are not talking normal courts or normal people.
But, but, but, I thought Hillary was relieved her aides would be talking.
Say it ain’t so!!
Our fathers would have tar and feathers handy for such as these.
Hillary has done this once before, blurring the lines between public servant and personal attorney in order to claim attorney-client privilege when questioned.
What was the guy’s name again??
Oh, yeah. Vince Foster.
Sounds to me like a huge conflict of interest. Donald should have fun with this Crookes Hillary episode.
Mills is dirty. Really dirty.
Isn’t such a blatant conflict of interest grounds for disbarment?
First, there is a clear conflict of interest here that prevents the attorney client privilege from existing. Second, during the relevant period of time, both Clinton and Mills were employed by the government of the United States, and there could be no attorney-client privilege as between them (there may have been executive privileges and state secrets privileges, but that’s different). Third, the attorney-client privilege does not apply when the attorney is complicit in criminal acts. In other words, John Gotti’s attorneys could not tell him how to whack his enemies, and claim it was a privileged communication.
This is so transparently criminal.
Joined at the hip region.
So shrillary is now on the same moral plain as OJ...
‘Attorney-Client Privilege’ does not protect criminal actions or conspiracy to commit criminal actions...............
Uh oh, what if Huma didn’t take the bar exam? Maybe she can say that her husband was Hillary’s Weiner-at-law, and she was in the room serving cookies so she should be exempt too.