[detective]

The media are Clinton lap dogs and/or Clinton attack dogs.

They will tell any lie to help Clinton.

But why are so many Republicans attacking Trump and refusing to say anything negative about Clinton.

The same Republicans who dishonestly attack Trump refuse to explain and articulate the disaster of the many Clinton wrongdoings. The self described conservative Republicans need to speak clearly and articulately about the Clinton corruption and the danger she presents to America.

Sadly they refuse to.

[Sir Napsalot]

These same ‘consultants’ are position themselves so Trump and the normal GOP machine will pay them big bucks for their frequently failed ‘game’.

Also, it laid down the ground work later so they can blame Trump if he loses the election to Hillary (or whoever). “See, I (we) told you so, .....”

[edie1960]

If only other republicans would vent their wrath on Crooked Hillary and stop being traitors.
Just like what if Mittens had exhausted half as much energy last time against Obama, he might be up for reelection now.

[JBW1949]

GOPe are afraid of losing their “gravy train” when Trump is elected....

[norwaypinesavage]

"why are so many Republicans attacking Trump and refusing to say anything negative about Clinton."

Republicans have been attacking the Clintons since 1992. The press is simply replaying only the things they say about Trump.

[Helicondelta]

These critics have been wrong about everything for months.

As long as they don’t understand what Trump is doing, Trump has the advantage.

[Grampa Dave]

Any names or as usual the unnamed NeverTrumpers?

[Buckeye McFrog]

Trump did not get where he is by running a traditional campaign.

I think all the consultants and talking heads just need to SHUT UP.

[Mr. K]

In other words he should do what they think, not what he thinks.

And how many presidential elections have they won recently?

They could only eek out a squeaker against AlGore (one of the stupidest people ever to run for President) and John Effing Kerry - a proven military coward and the 2nd stupidest.

[Don Corleone]

The Donald has a steep hill to climb. He has faced determined opposition before and succeeded. He will do it again. JMHO!

[Beernoser]

Trump’s win depends on him signing up new white mid-low income voters who have dropped out of the system or were never in it.

Well those voters need to be registered to vote. He needs to have offices and organized efforts in every key state identifying and registering these potential supporters. He’s not.

Why?

[Roger Kaputnik]

“But why are so many Republicans attacking Trump and refusing to say anything negative about Clinton.”

Because they are all part of the same elite establishment. Their commitment and fidelity to their political party means nothing compared to maintaining control of the party and keeping their position at the feeding trough.

[goldstategop]

The GOP critics haven’t won a single caucus or primary.

Trump is poised to sweep five more tonight.

What do they know about winning?

Let ‘em shut yer yaps.

[huldah1776]

Very good assessment, with quotes, from Washington Examiner. If DT loses to Bernie there is only one person to blame. The one who doesn't take advice unless it's from a lawyer.

Byron York: Trump's self-destructive rambling baffles GOP strategists

In a speech that went a little less than an hour, Trump spent more than ten minutes talking about Trump University. Ten minutes is a lot of time. It was far more, for example, than Trump spent talking about jobs — one week before a terrible jobs report raised serious questions about the recovery. Ten minutes was more than Trump spent talking about illegal immigration, his signature issue. Or veterans, a recent favorite. Or even, astonishingly, the damning State Department report on Hillary Clinton's email scandal.

No, Trump spent more time talking about the Trump University lawsuit than all of those. He discussed individual plaintiffs by name. He discussed various law firms. His opinion on summary judgment. And more. And, in the course of his extended remarks, Trump said of Curiel, "So what happens is the judge, who happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that's fine..."

And it was off to the races. Trump spent the next several days — it's not over yet — sharpening his attack on Curiel and setting off a wave of indignation, anger, criticism, and embarrassment that sent Republican allies running as Trump dug his hole deeper and deeper.

But it all started not with a rival's attack but with Trump himself and that ten-minute soliloquy in San Diego.

posted at Washington Examiner 6/6/16 11:17 PM
link to article

[Democrats hate too much]

The GOP attacks his firey message.

[Ulysse]

ALLRIGHT we know that the MSM, the GOPe and blablabla

SO COUNT only on yourself .
TRUMP should answer QUICKLY clearly and straight !

[jmaroneps37]

Are these the same “experts” that set Trump’s ceiling at 30%?

[af_vet_1981]

The media are Clinton lap dogs and/or Clinton attack dogs. They will tell any lie to help Clinton.

Yep

But why are so many Republicans attacking Trump and refusing to say anything negative about Clinton

Three Reasons
1. He was wrong to inject ethnicity and he seems incapable of repentance or correction. It was gross negligence on his part.
2. He is not pivoting successfully to take on Clinton after her speech. Instead, nhe made it about his court case, not her corruption, not her gross negligence handling classified emails, but his court case and the ethnic heritage of the judge. It is all everyone is discussing and laughing about.
3. He is dropping in the polls after leading ever so slightly. They sense electoral disaster from his mistakes. Perhaps he can recover but it seems a long shot. There just aren't that many persuadable voters left.

[dfwgator]

Because the GOP are such experts at winning national elections. /s

[apillar]

By now, Republican Party critics argue, the party's presumptive presidential nominee was supposed to have stationed senior staff in battleground states, moderated his fiery message to attract new supporters and begun raking in big money.

According to who? The party establishment losers who put up 16 candidates that listened to their advice and lost miserably. Let Trump do his own thing, it's worked so far.

[entropy12]

The professional career politicians are mad that an amateur beat then out in the primaries.