Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Department reopens Clinton emails probe
Fox News ^ | 6/7/2016 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/07/2016 4:28:47 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Keep the conservatives chasing rainbows until after the election. That’s what they are trying to do. Nothing will come of this. Hitlery has to be defeated at the ballot box. All this other crap is deflection.


61 posted on 07/07/2016 6:11:10 PM PDT by Seruzawa (All those memories will be lost, like tears in rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Waste of time. The fix is in. Corruption is supported by the Democrats and they will never change. America is loaded with fool that are beyond redemption.


62 posted on 07/07/2016 6:12:18 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Now they have one of those “ongoing investigations” that protect them from answering questions.


63 posted on 07/07/2016 6:14:04 PM PDT by Buttons12 ( It Can't Happen Here -- Sinclair Lewis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

The RATs feel the spike of distrust coming from the electorate and this red herring is designed to smooth out that spike by delaying things. This is there pattern- delay the resolution long enough and everyone will forget. God help us!


64 posted on 07/07/2016 6:14:38 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

How perfect. Now The Beast can claim she was exonerated in two investigations into her email negligence.


65 posted on 07/07/2016 6:14:40 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surrey

Most Probably still is, but the Rats are experts in stalling, stone walling, subterfuge, and unadulterated lies. Hillary lied under oath about so many aspects of her email operation. She lies with a straight face, is shameless and congenital. The real sad truth is democrats do not care.


66 posted on 07/07/2016 6:14:54 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote, you are actually voting for the candidate's rich donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Trying to prove NO CLASSIFIED DOCS


67 posted on 07/07/2016 6:15:58 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Double jeopardy?

No, Clinton case was never tried in front of a jury or judge.

Even if the case had gone to a grand jury and they no-billed, the prosecutor could take the case to ANOTHER grand jury and try again.

However, this doesn't appear to be a criminal investigation. It's an administrative investigation, perhaps by the Dept. of State's Office of Personnel Security and Suitability (who administrates their security clearances).

If they don't try to whitewash it, the security clearance of everyone that sent classified information that was marked or obviously met the criteria (at the Top Secret/SAP level, it's very obvious) will probably have their clearance revoked.

It won't affect Clinton, but thereafter her staff will find it very difficult to work in a job that requires a clearance.

68 posted on 07/07/2016 6:27:41 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

K, Thanks. Some other folks also mentioned it. Be great if she’s denied a clearance. Be tough she couldn’t sit in on certain meetings. But then, neither did 0bozo.


69 posted on 07/07/2016 6:30:13 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

I have no confidence in the effectiveness or usefulness of this.


70 posted on 07/07/2016 6:49:11 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

the date of the article is 6/7?


71 posted on 07/07/2016 6:50:20 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

I think you are correct. Although it may do nothing for this current situation, they need to fix this ‘loophole’ at every level of gov’t in every agency.

I was under the impression that every gov’t employee took a ‘class’ on handling of sensitive/classified material. She must have played hookie that day. OR that kind of instruction is only for the little people who would be too terrified to pull off what she did.


72 posted on 07/07/2016 6:55:30 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

I was listening to Comey today and a senator asked him if Hillarys staffers had security clearances to handle classified information. He answered “No”. My jaw dropped.


73 posted on 07/07/2016 7:19:34 PM PDT by PJammers (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JPJones

I must have dreamed this but did Hillary order her staff to remove any classified headings from messages to her?


74 posted on 07/07/2016 7:21:45 PM PDT by Foundahardheadedwoman (God don't have a statute of limitations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Remember who runs or ruins the State Department, Lurch Kerry, the dumbest man in the Cabinet. Kirby is his mouthpiece. Hillary was the former Secy of State.

Get my point? Obama is the president. Lynch is the Secy of Justice.

WHO CAN YOU TRUST OUT OF THIS GROUP?

How do you say COVERUP 102?


75 posted on 07/07/2016 7:21:47 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

Oh wow! That’s really strange.


76 posted on 07/07/2016 8:19:36 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: orchestra

Maybe Cheryl Mills will have her car broken into a THIRD time on the way to a Congressional hearing to testify.


77 posted on 07/07/2016 8:27:24 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Gee every single one of her aides took the fifth multiple times. What criminal activity are they hiding. Are they protecting Obama. Inquiring minds want to know. Lois Lerner took the fifth. Was she protecting Obama? Why is Hillary taking the fall for him? Something bad going on in the top level of our government.


78 posted on 07/07/2016 8:45:56 PM PDT by dandiegirl (BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bygolly

***Seems to me the only reason they are reopening the investigation is so they avoid responding to any questions regarding the scandal while the “investigation is on-going”***

You are correct! You win the internet for today!


79 posted on 07/07/2016 9:44:38 PM PDT by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God. ROLL TIDE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“our money”
***This is another canard that really needs to be rebutted. First of all, it’s not “our” money. Rather, it’s the private property of the Federal Reserve, used under contract by the US and other nations as the standard form exchange.

Secondly, no one is paying taxes sufficient to actually finance the operations of government. Rather, the US and all developed nations use deficit spending. (Notes are purchased by the Fed Res, who credit the accounts of their borrower client states.)

If it wasn’t for our guys sitting in the MENA controlling the juice, we wouldn’t have a pot to piss in.***

This was a lecture I got earlier from a Freeper for using the term “our money.” When your figure out what this means, let me know.


80 posted on 07/07/2016 9:53:58 PM PDT by Lil Flower (American by birth. Southern by the Grace of God. ROLL TIDE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson