Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Posted on 11/24/2016 9:05:47 PM PST by Seizethecarp
that’s the Dem’s plan turn all the city’s in states blue, which makes it hard for the “red” folks in the rest of the state.
I personally think it would be hilarious andd icing on the cake if we find out that he was never eligible to run in the first place, a total fake.
Heck, we refuse to ask people for ID to vote.
Bring it!
Thanks, Seizethecarp.
Dec 15 to Jan 20 is a long time for Obama to do stuff. Would anyone even take action against Obama, depending on what’s revealed Dec 15?
Remember the video that came out just after Nov. 8th, “Who’s Laughing Now?” Part of it showed a smirking smirking Obama saying about Trump, “You’ll never be president.” then dropping his e-device. I’ll be honest. I’d like to see that smug expression wiped off his arrogant face.
“Why pursue this now??”
It’s called Justice.
The left are lawless anti-American scum and need to be exposed constantly and relentlessly if we have any hope of saving the country.
As a matter of process, the federal government can't operate that way.
It must assume the president is the President, and the congress is the Congress, and the laws enacted by the same are valid.
If, in the future, it's found that some aspect of the ruling order was legally invalid, e.g., the president wasn't eligible, then the outcome must depend upon the opinions of the sitting congress.
Of course, there are hard cases. E.g., a Supreme Court justice confirmed by one vote. But one of his votes turns out have stolen his senatorial election. What is to be done?
Answer: He's Mr Justice Whomever. Unless a majority of the House and two thirds of the Senate ...
And that's how the cookie crumbles.
Post 7.
I want him to go away.
You don’t live around here do you?
He has to be nailed once and for all.
Joe is leaving office soon.
Sorry but I doubt that fraud requires two-thirds of any vote it just requires criminal investigation.
That is true for a Supreme Court justice, but false for a president.
And, to return to the original question, it would not affect the validity of the actions of either while in office. It would be up subsequent bodies to determine the ultimate outcomes.
“Would anyone even take action against Obama, depending on what’s revealed Dec 15?”
No. They know damn well he was never eligible to be POTUS.
Like all cowardly capons, their fear of the state run media superseded their duty to uphold the Constitution and follow the FARKING RULE OF LAW.
I still think we need TREASON TRIALS for every DC ahole that let this travesty go on for the last 8 years.
No! The Truth always matters. Just like the investigation needs to go on for Hillary. He can pardon her if he wants, but she need to be confronted with what she did one way or another. What about Huma and all the other creeps that broke the law,....ignore them also? I think not.
Mention the name "Nixon" and watch the reaction from people that weren't even born then. She and Bill need to be remembered the same way. As it is 10 years from now she will be the mistreated woman always being stepped on by mean men. Feminists will weep thinking of what might have been. No,... there is a name in the Bible that is well remembered,....Jezebel.
Then just release it without the wikileaks, anonymous, Alex Jones type buildup. It’s a dead give away that it’s an attention ploy and the defeated Sheriff should gracefully walk away without going out looking like an old fool.
A fake pope and a fake president.
How did we go so wrong?
Obama’s grandma said that she was in the Mombassa hospital the day Obama was born. Then security officers told grandma to shut up and banned press interviews.
Jerome Corsi went there, got the worst beating, then jailed and then thrown out of the country.
Call me a birther. I don’t care. Grandmas don’t lie.
I thought they were meeting on Dec. 19th.
Yes it matters!!!! First the people should go after him, I know another legal suit, and the DNC who are complicit. He was a hobby who owes us money and all he did with his pen and blackberry is irrelevant. He held no position except liar and fraud in chief.
What if we could reverse all judicial nominations for being invalid???
Wouldn’t that be fascinating? Bye bye Kagen & Sotomayor
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.