Posted on 11/17/2017 10:23:00 AM PST by NorseViking
An Ohio lawmaker who routinely touted his Christian faith and anti-LGBT views has resigned after being caught having sex with a man in his office.
Wes Goodman, who is the Republican state legislator for Ohio, is married to a woman who is assistant director of an annual anti-abortion rally known as March for Life.
The right-wing legislator, who pushed “family values”, was reportedly witnessed having sex with a man inside his office who was not employed by the legislator.
According to the Columbus Dispatch, the observer told Ohio House Chief of Staff Mike Dittoe what had happened on Tuesday afternoon. Mr Dittoe responded by telling House Speaker Republican Cliff Rosenberger who in turn met with Mr Goodman.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
How utterly stupid.
What was the official reason Kasich was in his office?
Ooops. Time to circle the wagons.
But not too tightly, if you know what I mean.
Would it have been any better if the man HAD been employed by the legislator? I'm sure that would have made explaining it to his poor wife a LOT easier. "Oh, but he works for me, so it's OK." I just feel sorry for his wife.
There is something about homosexuality that is akin to disease. They don’t seem capable of resisting doing their sexual act, or where.
shouldn’t this make him a hero to the left? His behavior just endorsed the left’s raison d’etre
why are so many people mentally ill now? is there something in the water?
what makes a normal guy suddenly think some guys hairy butt hole looks hot?
I don’t understand the hypocrisy of some people, especially those in public office. Stupid man.
Now watch - I’m going to show you what NOY to do!!!
So... as a gay man... wouldn’t he know best about why LGBT is wrong?
As soon as I see that someone majored in "politics and government" in college (regardless of political affiliation), I assume I'm dealing with a lightweight or a craven, power-hungry A-hole.
What an asshole... oh wait...
Should he have employed the fellow?
OK, just being wry here.
Well, I think one could be carrying out “gay” vice in the closet and still have enough mind left to know that this stuff is going to be utter hell to society if it gets out of the closet.
Sodom was most definitely a non-closet situation.
Not to say God smiles on it in any wise, but some people don’t even make the same distinctions that the bible does, which when it was carried out such that there were not two or more witnesses, it would skate as far as the law’s penalty was concerned.
Getting it back out of society can’t mean extinguishing every single case of it. We don’t have police that can do this. But it can mean understanding that the closet should remain the closet.
Well... there was a group of men who pledged their fortunes, lives, and sacred honor to a quest that embraced political acts.
The right answer to that assertion is, “it depends.”
I'm sure he offered a b--w job.
Doh!
Sounds like they think it would have been okay if the other man HAD been an employee of his. ??
Sad to see what some people do to themselves.
This guy decided it was a good idea to put an end to it.
His hind end...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.