Not suprised.
How utterly stupid.
What was the official reason Kasich was in his office?
Ooops. Time to circle the wagons.
But not too tightly, if you know what I mean.
Would it have been any better if the man HAD been employed by the legislator? I'm sure that would have made explaining it to his poor wife a LOT easier. "Oh, but he works for me, so it's OK." I just feel sorry for his wife.
shouldn’t this make him a hero to the left? His behavior just endorsed the left’s raison d’etre
why are so many people mentally ill now? is there something in the water?
what makes a normal guy suddenly think some guys hairy butt hole looks hot?
I don’t understand the hypocrisy of some people, especially those in public office. Stupid man.
Now watch - I’m going to show you what NOY to do!!!
So... as a gay man... wouldn’t he know best about why LGBT is wrong?
What an asshole... oh wait...
Should he have employed the fellow?
OK, just being wry here.
Well, I think one could be carrying out “gay” vice in the closet and still have enough mind left to know that this stuff is going to be utter hell to society if it gets out of the closet.
Sodom was most definitely a non-closet situation.
Not to say God smiles on it in any wise, but some people don’t even make the same distinctions that the bible does, which when it was carried out such that there were not two or more witnesses, it would skate as far as the law’s penalty was concerned.
Getting it back out of society can’t mean extinguishing every single case of it. We don’t have police that can do this. But it can mean understanding that the closet should remain the closet.
Doh!
Sounds like they think it would have been okay if the other man HAD been an employee of his. ??
Sad to see what some people do to themselves.
This guy decided it was a good idea to put an end to it.
His hind end...
OK Goodman: better call Saul!
House Chief of Staff, Mike Dittoe, agrees. He always agrees.
Gross
Through the text, you can actually hear Maya Oppenheim’s ecstatic screams as the orgasms wracked her body while typing this.
Not suprised.
“The right-wing legislator, who pushed “family values”, was reportedly witnessed having sex with a man inside his office who was not employed by the legislator.”
... so does this mean the reporter would have felt differently about it HAD he been employed by the legislator?
In any event, even people who have repented still struggle with the sin that so easily entangles them and will till the body of death is finally removed ... though of course this guy may not be struggling at all and may be as unrepentant as the day he first molested another guy’s ass.
Those truths aside there is an faulty attitude about hypocricy that is at odds with knowing about human sin nature and it is often most clearly expressed by those who don’t believe in sin, or at least Biblical sin (social sinning against things PC is another matter entirely), and it boils down to a celebration of non-progressives being less than they claim to be.
Those who may celebrate every perversion and revile all godliness are, in short scandalized by Christians who act like the world even as they love it when they do.
And guess what? This is nothing new. Long ago it was told to Israel that it was on account of them that heathens blasphemed. Why should that change?
Leaving office isn’t repentance. That’s as easily a tribute to the wants of the offendsensitive left. Repentance is a daily matter because, to be blunt, your average human being has difficulty staying on the proverbial alter and keeps trying to crawl off. The world doesn’t get that, especially the post-moderns who are mockers and revilers. It doesn’t see, as per the song, those who fall down and get up. It only sees hypocricy when those who disagree with it still are caught acting like the world.
To the nutter left a sinner who celebrates sin (if it’s a socially approved sin like homosexuality is) is better than a man who struggles with sin because they aren’t hypocrites.
The person that struggles with sin is better than the libertine precisely because the libertine is so unconflicted. This is even true when a “moral” heathen is compared to the wanton heathen, their morality may not profit them but it at least has practical benefits to them and society.
Much better still to be repentant, though.