hope that Castro doesn't decide to take any hostages........
I'll be back to read all the article and your essay.....thanks!
Posted on 05/13/2002 1:44:12 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
WASHINGTON - Cuba's Fidel Castro is fond of saying he's ruled through nine American presidents who have come and gone trying to see him and his revolution defeated.The quip may say little for Mr. Castro's democratic credentials, but if the wily dictator turns on his famous sense of humor, he may find the moment to slip it in during this week's visit to Cuba by Jimmy Carter – US president No. 6 on Castro's list. Continues.
====================================================================
Lovefest In Havana
'Ah, paradise, at long last', Carter probably said to himself as his private jet touched down in Havana Sunday morning.
The question isn't why the visit, but what took Carter so long? Indeed, Jimmy's always struck me as somewhat of a trailblazer, of sorts: His island rendezvous with el loco makes him only the first U.S. President to step on Cuban soil since Castro's takeover in January, 1959.
Then again, if memory serves, the former peanut farmer was First at many, many other things, too. For openers, Jimmy was first to give us the Misery Index (remember that one?); first to give us 22% interest rates; first to give us stagflation; first to give us a Mariel boatlift; first to give us $1-plus gas and long lines at the pump in "peacetime" -- oh, and an "Energy" department, to boot!. And let's not forget the Sandinistas and the ever lovable, always adorable Ayatollah Khomeini -- Ol' Jimmy gave us them, too!
For liberals, the problem with Castro's Cuba isn't the lack of human rights -- heck, when have liberals given diddly-squat about 'rights' under communist regimes, anyhow? Stalin's biggest bootlickers were, not in Moscow, but right here in the good ol' U.S. of A. -- among the squalid, militant, flag-burning leftist elite. Just like Castro's today.
Nope, according to libs, ya see, if only the U.S. did more business with Cuba, Voila! Castro becomes Thomas Jefferson and Cuba a mecca of pluralism -- overnight! Yessiree, Bob.
Gee, lemme see if I get this straight: If we -- the U.S. -- traded more openly, more freely with Castro, up from his tropical gulag emerges a pluralistic society -- dictatorship vanishes magically in the winds of a glorious democracy, right?
But, wait a sec -- stop the presses! Isn't this called 'Constructive Engagement' -- the hated Reagan policy towards South Africa during the days of Apartheid?
I don't get it: Weren't lefties clamoring for sanctions then? 'Sanctions! Sanctions! Divest now!', they cried. 'Constructive Engagement'? Ha! 'Get real', they'd tell you. To libs, those were dirty words, a corporate ruse, barely disguised, to prop up repression. 'The U.S. has no business doing business with South Africa -- divest now!', they bellowed like banshees.
Help me out here: If, as liberals tell us, Socialism/Communism is so terrific, so splendid, so superb, so superior, why, O why does Castro so desparately need the Great Satan of commercialist/capitalist "evil" itself -- the United States? A bailout for Marxism from 'dirty', capitalist 'pigs' -- what's wrong with this picture?
Call it 'ideological projection': Liberals doing with Castro exactly what conservatives were falsely accused by liberals of doing with South Africa: To wit, using excuses to prop-up repression.
Liberalism has a crush on Castro, a school-girl-like infatuation that forever endures.
To liberals, Castro is a heartthrob; he's an inspiration, a "moral" guiding "light", a "moral" compass, the veritable apple of their eyes.
No human rights in Castro's Cuba? Liberals could care less. Under Castro, citizens are deprived of the most basic conceptions of human liberty -- again, lefties don't give a lick.
In Cuba's brutal island prison, one-party, one-man-rule prevails: Except for Castro's Communist "party", all political parties are outlawed. The same goes for unions.
The liberal media calls Castro, deferentially, the "President" of Cuba -- an utter perversion of language so grotesque it boggles the mind. By what sick, warped, convolution of "logic" can Castro conceivably be referred to as such?
Only a twisted media would dare sully the title by bestowing it to Castro, a ruthless killer, filthy crook, murderous tyrant.
Freedom of speech? Freedom of expression? In Cuba, only for the Castro brothers. Opponents of the regime who dare speak out are jailed, tortured, beaten and killed. Political prisoners, by the thousands, languish in Castro's dirty prisons.
Human rights, political prisoners, government repression, corruption -- these issues, for liberals, take a backseat to "improving" U.S.-Cuba 'ties'.
Yes, oh yes, that old smokes screen is back again; the same one which, during the Cold War, was used to thwart debate over Moscow's appalling human rights 'record'. 'Better not rock the boat by pressing the Soviets too hard on human rights: Bear in mind -- they have nukes, so back off', liberals would warn.
But in Cuba, that humbug, that bogus poppycock doesn't wash: There are no nukes in Cuba.
Carter parades himself sanctimoniously as "democracy's" champion, monitoring elections from Haiti to East Timor, ostensibly checking them for fairness and openess. His comaraderie and friendship with the most barbaric regime ever to blot this hemisphere says all you'll ever need to know about ol' Jimmy. The stench of hypocrisy oozing from Havana is beyond insufferable.
The inescapable bottom line: Carter and his leftist dregs, yet again, stand revealed as the contemptible apologists for tyranny that they are, and will always be.
Anyway, that's....
My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"
Castro: "Who's Ayn Rand?"
one big daddy and a world of rumnuts---a la the peanut brain king--kingdumb!
But the Left would say Castro and Carter are merely seeking justice for the people of the world - that it's necessary to take control to achieve this noble goal. They are the anointed ones with superior goals and ideas, who need to be more equal than others, after all, it's hard work being elite and having to conquer that rotten urge for self-enrichment. But they continue on, knowing that some day, given the right conditions, it will come to pass. Their supporters will be useful idiots or use useful idiots who believe they have sacrificed and given their lives to create the perfect system - to make the world a paradise.
LOL! And Dan RatherBiased can be the ring bearer!
In Cuba's brutal island prison, one-party, one-man-rule prevails: Except for Castro's Communist "party", all political parties are outlawed. The same goes for unions.We can call this visit by Carter to see Cuba and meet with Castrate......The liberal media calls Castro, deferentially, the "President" of Cuba -- an utter perversion of language so grotesque it boggles the mind. By what sick, warped, convolution of "logic" can Castro conceivably be referred to as such?
Only a twisted media would dare sully the title by bestowing it to Castro, a ruthless killer, filthy crook, murderous tyrant.
Freedom of speech? Freedom of expression? In Cuba, only for the Castro brothers. Opponents of the regime who dare speak out are jailed, tortured, beaten and killed. Political prisoners, by the thousands, languish in Castro's dirty prisons.
But most Cuba watchers say the Carter visit won't lead to any substantial changes in US-Cuba relations. With one Bush in the White House (thanks to a controversial election in Cuba-sensitive Florida), another Bush in the governor's seat in Florida (and facing reelection), and an anti-Castro Cuban-American in the State Department's top Western Hemisphere post, expect relations to remain disjointed for the foreseeable future............Aw! Do I detect a bit of disgruntlement by The Christian Science Monitor regarding:
1. The way the election turned out?
2. U.S. policies toward Cuba?
Carter is also expected to meet with Oswaldo Payá, who has stunned the Cuban government by quietly collecting 10,000 signatures on a petition demanding a national referendum to ask Cubans if they want civil liberties like freedom of speech, private enterprise, and an end to political imprisonment. The Cuban Constitution says a referendum should be called if 10,000 voters support it.I wonder if it's too biased on my part to think that when Castrate gets
Psychopathological Projection Syndrome is alive and well and is but a symptom of the far worse malaise: Liberalism!
[Hello, Mon Ami -- and greetings FRom Sunny Downtown Australia!]
For a minute there I thought the CSM had suddenly seen the light and adopted a pull-no-punches writing style, but no such luck...
Excellent!
That's exactly right, John. The sad thing about this is the cruel reality in which Cubans live. Communism is a "concept"--nothing more. Castro is a murderer, and so is any oppressive, controlling, totalitarian government. The Liberals who romanticize Castro or any other totalitarian, i.e. Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Mao or others, have obviously never felt the pain of not being able to express an individual idea. Plus these leaders have never known anything but the lust for their own power, repression, human rights abuses, killings, and illegal jailing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.