Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Were The Knights Templar? (Sunday History Read)
www.templarhistory.com ^ | undated | Stephen Dafoe and Alan Butler

Posted on 07/21/2002 10:01:31 AM PDT by Hacksaw

The Knights Templar were a monastic military order formed at the end of the First Crusade with the mandate of protecting Christian pilgrims on route to the Holy Land. Never before had a group of secular knights banded together and took monastic vows. In this sense they were the first of the Warrior Monks.

From humble beginnings of poverty when the order relied on alms from the traveling pilgrims, the order would go on to have the backing of the Holy See and the collective European monarchies.

Within two centuries they had become powerful enough to defy all but the Papal throne. Feared as warriors, respected for their charity and sought out for their wealth, there is no doubt that the Templar knights were the key players of the monastic fighting orders. Due to their vast wealth and surplus of materials the Templars essentially invented banking, as we know it. The church forbade the lending of money for interest, which they called usury. The Templars, being the clever sort they were, changed the manner in which loans were paid and were able to skirt the issue and finance even kings.

They were destroyed, perhaps because of this wealth or fear of their seemingly limitless powers. In either case, the order met with a rather untimely demise at the hands of the Pope and the King of France in 1307 and by 1314, "The Poor Fellow Soldiers of Christ and the Temple of Solomon" ceased to exist.

Although originally a small group of nine knights, they quickly gained fame largely due to the backing of Bernard of Clairvaux and his "In Praise of the New Knighthood". Bernard at that time was often called the Second Pope and was the chief spokesman of Christendom. He is also the one responsible for helping to draw up the order's rules of conduct.

In European political circles, they became very powerful and influential. This was because they were immune from any authority save that of the Papal Throne. (Pope Innocent II exempted the Templars from all authority except the Pope.) After the crusades were over, the knights returned to their Chapters throughout Europe and became known as moneylenders to the monarchs. In the process many historians believe they invented the Banking System. The Templars fought along side King Richard I (Richard The Lion Hearted) and other Crusaders in the battles for the Holy Lands.

The secret meetings and rituals of the knights would eventually cause their downfall. The King of France, Philip the Fair used these rituals and meetings to his advantage to destroy the knights. The real reason for his crushing the Templars was that he felt threatened by their power and immunity. In 1307, Philip, who desperately needed funds, to support his war against England's Edward I made his move against the Knights Templar.

On October 13th, 1307, King Philip had all the Templars arrested on the grounds of heresy, since this was the only charge that would allow the seizing of their money and assets. The Templars were tortured and as a result, ridiculous confessions were given. These confessions included:

Trampling and spitting on the cross

Homosexuality and Sodomy

Worshipping of the Baphomet

Philip was successful in ridding the Templars of their power and wealth and urged all fellow Christian leaders to do the same thing. On March 19th, 1314 the last Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay was burned at the stake. De Molay is said to have cursed King Philip and Pope Clement as he burned asking both men to join him within a year. Whether he actually uttered the curse or if it is simply an apocryphal tale what remains as fact is that Clement died only one month later and Philip IV seven months after that.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: archaeology; catholic; christian; churchhistory; crusades; freemasonry; fremasons; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; knights; knightstemplar; masons; middleages; pilgrims; templar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: another cricket
It made for a good show. Was sorry I missed most of it. I'm doubtful, as you, that it was Templar relics.
61 posted on 07/21/2002 5:43:12 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
To Sr71A the bible used by Washington to take the oath of office, is the same one used by George W.Bush, It is known as the Masonic Bible, and is in the custody of a Blue Lodge in New York City.

They the Blue Lodge, loan out the Bible for some occasions but the Bible is delivered by Brothers of the Lodge, and they are not allowed to fly with the Bible, but must travel by Auto.
62 posted on 07/21/2002 5:45:46 PM PDT by BooBoo1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Hacksaw
If you like Christian fiction, Hidden in Time is about an archaeologist searching for the Ark of the Covenant using clues left by the Knights Templar.

I'd recommend reading Rift in Time first (discovery of the Garden of Eden and Noah's Ark) because Hidden in Time is a sequel to Rift.

It's fairly light reading - sort of like an British Indiana Jones. They were good beach reading.

64 posted on 07/21/2002 5:58:24 PM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
this post and links put me in a mind to re-read "Illuminatis Trilogy" ... the ultimate conspircacy books.
65 posted on 07/21/2002 6:01:45 PM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
I could be wrong but I believe that the knights also controlled the only source of amber in europe. That I believe is what pushed them into power among other things.
66 posted on 07/21/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by Brush_Your_Teeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
bttt
67 posted on 07/21/2002 6:35:14 PM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
http://www.britannia.com/history/bb1312.html
is a link that at least documents that October 13,
1307 fell on a Friday. A Google search finds multiple
references to this as the origin of the superstition but
I guess there is no way to really no for sure.
68 posted on 07/21/2002 8:05:10 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mercy
Please explain. Jesus never married and since he is considered sinless he surely never committed adultery. How can he have heirs?

There's been some speculation that Jesus was married. Some of the speculation is in a book "Was Jesus Married?: The Distortion of Sexuality in the Christian Tradition" by William E. Phipps.

In a nutshell, in those days it was the norm for parents to arrange marriages for their kids at an early age. It would have been unusual for him NOT to have been married. The first miracle was Jesus turning water into wine at a wedding. The speculation is that the wedding was HIS wedding. Later in the Gospel mention is made of the "disciple whom Jesus loved". The speculation was that this was Jesus's son.

After the crucifiction, Jesus's family was supposed to have been smuggled off to France

69 posted on 07/22/2002 1:01:20 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
Ohhhhhhh ........... Libertarians.
70 posted on 07/22/2002 11:50:44 AM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
In a nutshell, in those days it was the norm for parents to arrange marriages for their kids at an early age. It would have been unusual for him NOT to have been married. The first miracle was Jesus turning water into wine at a wedding. The speculation is that the wedding was HIS wedding. Later in the Gospel mention is made of the "disciple whom Jesus loved". The speculation was that this was Jesus's son.

Isaiah 53:8 disagrees:
By oppression and judgment he was taken away. And who can speak of his descendants? For he was cut off from the land of the living; for the transgression of my people he was stricken.

The "disciple whom Jesus loved" was John, his brother.

Not that knowing the truth will ever stop people from making stuff up.

71 posted on 07/22/2002 12:12:20 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: golindseygo
I'm thinking "At the Mountains of Madness". Wrong critter?
72 posted on 07/22/2002 7:56:18 PM PDT by Gwaihir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: golindseygo
I'm thinking "At the Mountains of Madness". Wrong critter?

Yep. HP Lovecraft's works were entirely fictional, but it would make for an interesting life. :)

73 posted on 07/23/2002 9:30:47 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
i am sorry but a lot of campuses frat are in with the masons i have read book after book on the computer plus with the knowledge of my own that i have i believe they do worship satan and can get away with rape or various ccrimes because of the code nobody dares tell on any of the other ones you who believe they are good need to take another look, I wish in this day and age we can do away with masons
74 posted on 10/13/2003 7:38:33 AM PDT by lonlyjen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: OHelix
What NUT believes that Jesus had children with Mary Magdalene?? Talk about making somethin up out of WHOLE CLOTH!!!

They would be considered anti_Christian at the very LEAST!

75 posted on 10/13/2003 7:56:15 AM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Read "Born In Blood" by J. J. Robinson. A fascinating and comprehensive history. If he is correct, they are the foundation of Free Masonry.
76 posted on 10/13/2003 8:00:33 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII
I am also a member and I believe that J. J. Robinson's book, "Born In Blood" covers the connection quite well.
77 posted on 10/13/2003 8:02:02 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Merovingian
Ping, O exalted scion of Dagobert!
78 posted on 10/13/2003 8:02:54 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Kinda like what the Queers are doing to Christianity.
79 posted on 10/13/2003 8:03:07 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
The Eco book? It was VERY hard to read, and I love his stuff!
80 posted on 10/13/2003 8:03:44 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson