Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space rock 'on collision course'
BBC ^ | 2002-07-23 | Dr David Whitehouse

Posted on 07/23/2002 7:00:00 PM PDT by Lorenb420

An asteroid discovered just weeks ago has become the most threatening object yet detected in space.

A preliminary orbit suggests that 2002 NT7 is on an impact course with Earth on 1 February 2019, although the uncertainties are large.

Astronomers have given the object a rating on the so-called Palermo technical scale of threat of 0.06, making NT7 the first object to be given a positive value.

From its brightness astronomers estimate it is about 2km wide, large enough to cause continent-wide devastation on Earth.

Although astronomers are saying the object definitely merits attention, they expect more observations to show it is not on an Earth-intersecting trajectory.

It was first seen on the night of 5 July, picked up by the Linear Observatory's automated sky survey programme in New Mexico, in the southern US.

Since then astronomers worldwide have been paying close attention to it, amassing almost 200 observations in a few weeks.

Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, told BBC News Online that "this asteroid has now become the most threatening object in the short history of asteroid detection".

NT7 circles the Sun every 837 days and travels in a tilted orbit from about the distance of Mars to just within the Earth's orbit.

Potential devastation

Detailed calculations of its orbit suggest many occasions when its projected path through space intersects the Earth's orbit.

Researchers estimate that on 1 February 2019 its impact velocity on the Earth would be 28km a second - enough to wipe out a continent and cause global climate changes.

However, Dr Peiser was keen to point out that future observations could change the situation.

He said: "This unique event should not diminish the fact that additional observations in coming weeks will almost certainly, we hope, eliminate the current threat."

Easily observable

According to astronomers NT7 will be easily observable for the next 18 months or so, meaning there is no risk of losing the object.

Observations made over that period - and the fact that NT7 is bright enough that it is bound to show up in old photographs - mean that astronomers will soon have a very precise orbit for the object.

Dr Donald Yeomans, of Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, told BBC News Online: "The orbit of this object is rather highly inclined to the Earth's orbit so it has been missed because until recently observers were not looking for such objects in that region of space."

Regarding the possibility of an impact, Dr Yeomans said the uncertainties were large.

"The error in our knowledge of where NT7 will be on 1 February 2019 is large, several tens of millions of kms," he said.

Dr Yeomans told BBC News Online that the world would have to get used to finding more objects like NT7 that, on discovery, look threatening, but then become harmless.

"This is because the problem of Near Earth Objects is now being properly addressed," he said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astroids; crevolist; goliath; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: rmlew
Would deflecting it to a shorter orbit and slowing it have the effect of causing it to be drwan in by the Suns gravity over time?

No, it would kick it into a different orbit. Unless that orbit intersects with the sun on the first pass, it will stay in that same orbit indefinitely. (Caveat: since it does make occasional passes very close to the Earth, it is possible that a slight change might put it on a course for a gravitational slingshot maneuver past the Earth, by which method it can be made to go just about anywhere. But this would require steering it exquisitely close to the Earth, taking us to the very edge of catastrophe, which is what we want to avoid.)

Why wouldn't a large explosion at an anlge not change its course and orbit?

Well, there's large and then there's large. What seems a large amount of energy to us is terribly small compared to the kinetic energy of this rock.

61 posted on 07/24/2002 4:54:04 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
A Dallas Area Rocket society member told me that water rockets are the "big thing" A 2 liter or 3 liter bottle can be "pumped up" and launched. One of the local members has a two stage water rocket with the first stage being 4 2 liter bottles! I remember in '57 when the first commercial water rockets were available. biggest problem was retrieving them from trees and off roofs!

Easy to find web sites on how to build these "beasties"

62 posted on 07/24/2002 7:22:31 AM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Lorenb420

Asteroid 2002 NT7 is currently just a 1 on the Torino Scale. There's nothing to worry about here.

63 posted on 07/24/2002 10:22:30 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
End of the world ping.
64 posted on 07/24/2002 2:15:46 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I should live so long!
65 posted on 07/24/2002 2:18:53 PM PDT by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
End of the world ping.

That again! Take care of it, will you? I'll be busy until March of 2023.

66 posted on 07/24/2002 2:24:57 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Perhaps we should start one of those prayer threads.
67 posted on 07/24/2002 2:26:29 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Take care of it, will you?

Already working on it. I'm putting out calls to Hollywood starlets who are willing to descend with me into my luxurious bunker to wait it out.

68 posted on 07/24/2002 2:28:16 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jay W; PatrickHenry
"Fire phasers." (phasers fire).

"Spock, what effect?"

"The asteroid has been obliterated, Captain, however, sensors reveal that a Klingon warship has just dropped out of warp near Saturn."

A common misconception, but phasers will not destroy large asteroids. What you need to do is find the alien obelisk that contains the asteroid-repulsion beam...

69 posted on 07/24/2002 2:30:50 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lorenb420
I just heard that the President of France is broadcasting a surrender message.
70 posted on 07/24/2002 2:35:09 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
I have two possible solutions. First, since Physicist says we can't deflect the asteroid, we'll just have to move the earth. If that's not feasable, then we should deploy Congressman Gerold Nadler to the point of impact, so he can act as a bumper.

71 posted on 07/24/2002 2:37:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Yes, Physicist says that we probably can't deflect it, but I wonder if anyone's entertained the possibility of destroying it outright. I figure that you're on the right track with Nadler, but we need a bigger bang. Therefore, if we shoot both Nadler and Ted Kennedy out of giant space cannons at the asteroid, aimed in such a way as to strike opposite sides of it, the asteroid will surely be crushed between them.


72 posted on 07/24/2002 2:52:03 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Therefore, if we shoot both Nadler and Ted Kennedy out of giant space cannons at the asteroid, aimed in such a way as to strike opposite sides of it, the asteroid will surely be crushed between them.

The recoil from shooting Ted Kennedy into space would probably knock us into the sun.

73 posted on 07/24/2002 5:18:18 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Ah, but I anticipated that, although my post was less than clear, I admit. By "space cannons", I meant "orbital space cannons". Here, I'm envisioning some sort of superconducting magnet/railgun sort of thing, of course.

The main drawback I see is similar to what you point out, though - the possibility that a Kennedy or Nadler might remain almost motionless, as the cannons shot off into deep space in the opposite direction...

74 posted on 07/24/2002 5:32:46 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: general_re
You need rockets, not cannons! The only problem is lashing a few Saturn Vs together.

Oh! We don't make Saturn Vs anymore? Never mind!

75 posted on 07/24/2002 5:34:40 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Oh! We don't make Saturn Vs anymore? Never mind!

We're probably...


76 posted on 07/24/2002 6:29:25 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: txculprit
Looks like we really are going to lose California, but on the bright side, look what that Cretaceous monster did to develop tourism in the Yucatan.

You say "on the bright side" as though losing California wasn't good in and of itself.

*rimshot*
77 posted on 07/25/2002 5:11:46 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lorenb420
it has been missed because until recently observers were not looking for such objects in that region of space."

Hmmm, how many more might be wandering that section.

78 posted on 07/25/2002 5:18:01 AM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorenb420
As a conservative, I generally oppose spending on government programs.

But in this case, I believe these close calls with asteroids warrant the U.S. government to find out where these asteroids are and research how to deflect them.

A few million dollars spent on asteroid detection and defense will pale in comparison to the trillions of dollars in damage that would result from the impact of an asteroid of this magnitude.

Or better yet, maybe Steven Speilberg can spend the money he made from Deep Impact to fund such programs.

Opinions?

79 posted on 07/25/2002 10:05:33 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
It seems that sooner or later one of these things will collide with earth, I guess it's happened more than once in the past. I know that (nobel prize winning) chemist Kari Mullis worries about it. But are you saying that there is nothing that humanity can do to defend earth from such an event?
80 posted on 07/27/2002 9:48:34 AM PDT by Sam Cree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson